The Grapes Of Wrath Literary Analysis

642 Words2 Pages

America is renown for being a land opportunity; however, there were moments in the country’s history where opportunity was not always available. America’s poor often played the game of survival of the fittest. This game featured immigrants coming to America with hopes to live the American Dream and farmers moving from one agricultural landscape to another during harsh growing seasons. Few mediums have been able to capture the entirety of the weary immigrant and the lowly farmer’s experience like the novels The Jungle by Upton Sinclair and The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck. These books contain an undeniable similarity in its tragedies and injustices, which are portrayed through the parallel philosophies of Tom Joad and Jurgis Rudkus;however, these books also contain differences in Jim Casy and Phil Conner that show the mirror image strife and struggle thrown upon the impoverished. Tom Joad from The Grapes of Wrath and Jurgis Rudkus from The Jungle are similar due their search for social justice and the change to their character due to their strong beliefs in change. Tom is seen getting to become an advocate for the migrant workers when he is talking to Ma Joad in the cave near the boxcars when Ma asks Tom what he is going to do with Tom replying, “What …show more content…

Jim Casy is the complement to Tom dues to his lasting effect on even after his death, while Phil Conner is a foil to Jurgis, as Jurgis’s usually caring nature is contrasted by Phil’s manipulation and greed. Throughout the novel, Jim has been characterized as self-sacrificing, selfless man who figured that the migrant workers deserved better and that through their individual struggle; they are one, which reflected when Tom states: [Jim] Says he foun' he jus' got a little piece of a great big soul...But I know now a fella ain't no good alone. (Steinbeck

Open Document