The Fish And Traveling Through The Dark, By William Stafford

656 Words2 Pages

There is a fine line between right and wrong. One that most, if not all, people cannot see due to the graying of the line. Something that may seem wrong to one person, may be the right thing for another, due to different perspectives. Elizabeth Bishop’s poem “The Fish,” and William Stafford’s poem “Traveling through the Dark,” both prove that choices are made based off the setting, tone, perspective, and reasoning. Bishop’s poem and Stafford’s poem have very contrasting settings. “Traveling through the dark” takes place in a dark, lonely road; closer to the woods rather than a populated area. Judging by this setting, the reader can almost guess what is going to happen at the end of the story. On the other hand, Bishop’s poem takes on a more …show more content…

As stated previously, the poems hold opposing ideas and the tone to both poems is no different. However, both poems happen to take on a similar tone as well as a contrasting one. Initially, Stafford’s poem starts off with a somber tone, by referring to death and describing the darkness of the scene. With only the tail-light shining and the cold, stiffened doe lying dead on the floor the reader is left to feel the darkness of the scene (lines 5&6). Although the speaker finds it no big deal to roll the deer off of the cliff, the tone switches to contemplative when he has to decide whether to save the fawn or not. Accordingly, Bishop’s poem also takes on this contemplative tone throughout most of the story. The speaker in Bishop’s poem tells the readers that “[they] admired his sullen face” (line 45). By describing the appearance of the fish the speaker not only shows the decision being made, but also its admiration towards the fish, giving the poem a more reverent …show more content…

However, one could argue that the speaker in Stafford’s poem was doing the right thing for the prevention of the next person about to hit a deer on that same road. The speaker in Stafford’s poem reasons that it’s best to roll the deer off the road and into the canyon due to the road being narrow. This makes swerving not the best decision, for it could create more deaths that are not all animal related (lines 3-4). The same could be said for Bishop’s poem regarding the decision the fisher makes on whether to keep the fish or set it free. The fisher’s intentions of getting on the boat and fishing gives the reader the impression that they are there to catch fish, whether to eat or sell. Imagine being in the speaker’s position, seeing the fish that “[looked] battered and venerable” (line 8) and basically torn to shreds from facing many attempts of being captured. The fact that the speaker took in the fish’s state tells the reader that they took into consideration the consequences of both

Open Document