“The European Crisis is over, Growth has resumed and we can now relax about the viability of the Euro Area” Discuss and evaluate.
The talk of the Euro has been a central debate for economists, since its introduction in 1999 to the tough times it faces today. It was brought in to stimulate growth by increasing trade and creating more integrated financial markets for investors. It allowed member states to forgo exchange rate fluctuation risks and costs, which meant more economic stability and growth. However the EMU was set up, without any exit strategies in place , in order to portray a sense of strength to investors. This seems to be currently hampering Euro Area growth rates with its inflexibility to deal with asymmetric shocks which are yet to be back to pre-crisis levels (see figure 1). Policy makers within the ECB are struggling to create fiscal and monetary measures that will stimulate growth, and brings into question the viability of the Euro as an optimum currency within Europe. This was already shown by the failed reforms of 2010.
The problems in Europe arose when 10 large Euro-zone banks asked for a bailout from the ECB. Lower confidence in markets led banks to cease capital flows which in turn led to financial strains on periphery governments. This ultimately worsened bank balance sheets and important credit creations, increasing government debts (see figure 3). However with all business cycles, there are booms and busts and it is the ECB’s job to smoothen growth over time. Nevertheless the Euro is hampering the recovery rather than stimulating the economies of various nations, and shows its inability to be a suitable optimum currency. These problems, were brought forth during its conception as the area seems to b...
... middle of paper ...
...it framework, allowing for a more politically united front and permits governments to better re-structure their debt.
The viability of the Euro area depends on Europe’s willingness to become a more united political state. It has become increasing clear that it is not moving towards a banking union or a safe euro asset. The Euro was brought in to stimulate growth, through increased trade and job mobility but has since done little to help the crisis recovery. The demise of the Euro may lead to a crisis with loss in confidence, however in future years it will be looked at as decision that benefits the region and will question why it was brought in place. It seems the longer the decision on the Euro is prolonged, the greater the political backlash will be. Therefore we no forward movement in sight, a retreat in the EMU will almost certainly be inevitable.
The European Union has been helped economically ever since World War II. Right after World War II’s end, Europe was struggling to hold on. The countries of the modern-day European Union thought it would be a good idea to come together and help each others struggling economy. To this day, this decision has had a very positive outcome on the EU’s economy. As shown in Diagram 1, the European Union combined together has the world’s highest GDP at 18.3 Trillion USD as compared to the United States’ 17.4 Trillion USD GDP and China’s 10.4 Trillion USD GDP. The idea
First, the budget deficit. It’s basically the idea that the government spending is greater that its earning. They are two ways to manage this deficit, either to cut spending (Medicare, Medicaid and social security etc.) or increase taxes. However, each solution has its disadvantages. If the government increased taxes, people will spend less money and if they cut spending, people will complain about it arguing that this may hurt the nation.
...arisen in the form of unfunded mandates. The federal government has created national directives, but occasionally failed in providing the necessary funding. As a result, its power in cooperative federalism may be compromised as it is not keeping up its end of the bargain. States and local governments have been forced to shoulder the costs of these programs (Ginsberg and Lowi et al. 83). This may result into modifications of national directives to match local desires, which may negate the principles of this federalism. However, the program has been mostly successful. Alongside the New Deal, it assisted many Americans to regain employment. In essence, it has improved the outlook of the national economy since the 1930s.
... economic system, one that needs no interference, and needs to type of larger organization involvement.
Each society at each level must settle on decisions about how to utilize its resources. Families must choose whether to spend their cash on another auto or a vacation. Towns must pick whether to put a greater amount of the financial plan into the
...nments, corporations and public institutions for the common good. [Which]… required a broadly framed policy” (229).
The movement of capital from the European core countries like Germany and France to the peripheral countries such as Greece began to subside. In 2010 the Greek Ministry of Finance published the Stability and Growth Program 2010 which listed GDP growth rates, government deficit, government debt level, budget compliance, and statistical credibility as the five main causes of the government-debt crisis plaguing Greece today, (…). The Greek economy was one of the fastest growing in Europe up to the time of the Great Recession. At the time of the original introduction of the euro in the years ranging from 2000 to 2007 the economy grew at around 4.2% annually. Greece faces lots of issues in its attempts to regain control of the crisis and their shattered economy and each year the crisis deepens and the international community keeps a watchful eye on the nation teetering on the edge of
Therefore, Europe eventually adopted the Stability and Growth Pact to regulate and monitor the fiscal debts of each country (Beetsna and Uhlig 547). However, there are many uncertainties of a unified economic system. Many believe the Stability and Growth Pact does not fit these concerns, and European Commission President Romano Prodi described it as being “stupid” (Savage and Verdun 843). In this paper, the various problems of a unified monetary will be analyzed to show a need for some regulations, while also revealing the short-comings of the Stability and Growth Pact.
Thomas Jr., L. (2011, September 19). Greece Nears the Precipice, Raising Fear. The New York Times. Retrieved on February 10, 2013 from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/business/global/as-greece-struggles-the-world-imagines-a-default.html?pagewanted=all
fundamental issues of how a society works and maintains itself. The goals behind the two works,
The euro has been in existence just long enough to generate sufficient data for a first look at its actual performance, having been introduced in January 1999. This assessment presents eight studies that use post-1999 data to provide a first look at how the euro is actually affecting trade, financial markets, macroeconomic policy-making, and Europe¡¯s economic performance.
How the euro benefits us all. European Communities, Economic and Financial Affairs, 2007. Web: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication9869_en.pdf
The EU and its single currency system referred to as the euro, is known today as one of the world’s most important currencies and is considered to be one of Europe’s most paramount achievements. The euro was launched January 1st 1999 automatically becoming the currency of more than 300 million people. From 1999 to 2002, the euro was classified as an invisible currency; merely utilized for electronic payments as well as accounting purposes. Euro notes were not habituated until January 1st 2002 when it supplanted fixed conversion rates along with the banknotes and coins of other national currencies such as the Belgian franc. The euro is now utilized by seventeen Member States of the European Union. The single currency presented irrefutable benefits for the region because it made traveling throughout Europe easier, empowered Europe on a global scale and lowered the costs of financial transactions. Prior to the euro, Europe had an established monetary system that was customarily put into place in March 1979 after the collapse of the Bretton Woods system. The European Monetary System (EMS), based a lot of concepts on fixed and adjustable exchange rates. The currencies of all the Member States, except the United Kingdom, participated in the exchange-rate mechanism (Padoa-Schioppa, Tommaso). The comprehensive and fundamental law of the (EMS) was to institute exchange rates based on central rates against the European Currency Unit, which was a weighted average of the participating currencies. Eventually over time, the EMS made strides in reducing exchange-rate variability. The economic convergence brought forth by the variability of those exchanges-rates allowed for astute currency stability within the region. Unfortunately, economi...
In the late 2000s, the World suffered from a big global economic crisis which caused “the largest and sharpest drop in global economic activity of the modern era”, in which “most major developed economies find themselves in a deep recession”, according to McKibbin and Stoeckel (1). Because its consequences have a very big impact to the whole world, many economists and scientist have tried to find the causes of the crisis; and some major causes have been emphasized are greed, the defection of the free market system, and the lack of prudent regulation and supervision. This essay will focus on the global imbalances, one of the most important causes of the current economic crisis.
In my opinion, the most important aspect is that government should consider the importance of the government macroeconomic objectives goals and which government should priority first. This will be an easier way for government to allocate the resources and help to focus the government macroeconomic objectives