The Ethics Of Authenticity Summary

642 Words2 Pages

Ward supports her argument with proven facts and techniques adopted by different religions to coexist outside of their denomination’s perspective. Ward acknowledges every faith has defining guidelines members must embrace. Ward stresses the need to identify the internal workings of other denominations to appeal to a moral order versus personal preference. The author uses Charles Taylor’s The Ethics of Authenticity to clarify how one must establish identity through exchange with or against others (72-73). Both Taylor and Richard Mouw suggest what authenticity means, and drives home claims to a higher order outside of one's personal preferences. Ward quotes Mouw that communication scholars must speak out of “convicted civility (110).” Ward advocates …show more content…

Every Christian uses the Bible in the quest for passages condoning other denominations without worship and authentic discussions with God to discover what communication should resemble in the pursuit of truth. The Bible says one must communicate to all humans amicably for coexistence to occur. Each religion shares a universal thread called worship; perhaps, discussions could start with a dialogue of worship, and move on to …show more content…

Ward acknowledges every faith has defining guidelines members must embrace. Ward stresses the need to identify the internal workings of other denominations to appeal to a moral order versus personal preference. The author uses Charles Taylor’s The Ethics of Authenticity to clarify how one must establish identity through exchange with or against others (72-73). Both Taylor and Richard Mouw suggest what authenticity means, and drives home claims to a higher order outside of one's personal preferences. Ward quotes Mouw that communication scholars must speak out of “convicted civility (110).” Ward advocates Horace Kallen’s theory of commonality (4). Ward asserts one can learn plenty about other denominations through an eagerness to tune in and learn through discussion. When a group facilitates a dialog discussion, members learn what “commonalities and differences” each perspective religion shares (7). Ward concludes both a “legal and social right” for religion exist, but members must use dialog which allows one to learn from one another while holding firm to personal beliefs. The author quotes Diana Eck in defining “pluralism as the encounter of commitments (71).” Ward states each encounter must embrace “civil, integral expressions of authenticity” (8). Pluralism acknowledges individuals are diverse in living, religions and views, but

Open Document