The Employment-At-Will Doctrine

1261 Words3 Pages

Employment-At-Will Doctrine
The employment-at-will doctrine is a reasonable rule that gives businesses the capacity to terminate workers. Managers can fire a worker "for a justifiable reason, an awful reason, or no reason by any stretch of the imagination" (Halbert and Ingulli, 2012, p.46). This tenet was created in the nineteenth century under the hypothesis that it would be generally as reasonable for a business to fire a representative for any reason, as it would be for a worker to leave from job whenever. Since the principle is so expansive, there have been a couple exemption. The conditions under which a representative can assert their end is unlawful is hard to demonstrate.
Employment-at-will refers to American Law's doctrine that defines an employment relationship in which employer or employee can right away terminate the employment relationship at any time with or without any notice. Also, no subsequent liability is considered, provided there was no express contract for a definite term governing the employment relationship and that the employer …show more content…

They include discrimination against color, race, sex, national origin, disability or age. Other exceptions are a promise of good faith or fair dealing in an employment contract, wrongful dismissal in breach of public policy or suggesting contractual duties based off of the employer's handbook. A tort is also an exception whether the policy originates from administrative practices, legislation, legal hearing, constitution or other sources. The tort presents the employee with an opportunity to persuade a jury to grant money awards (damages) for unlawful dismissal. Discharge of workers may be prohibited by some state or federal statutes if the employees it is based on a worker's filing of a compensation claim, participation in jury duty, involving a military duty, get involved in the union or particular incidence in whistle-blowing (Venn,

Open Document