The Effects of the Chernobyl Accident on International Actions Concerning Nuclear Power
Early in the morning of April 27, 1986, the world experienced its largest nuclear disaster ever (Gould 40). While violating safety protocol during a test, Reactor 4 at the Chernobyl power plant was placed in a severely unstable state, and in a matter of seconds the reactor output shot up to 120 times the rated output (Flavin 8). The resulting steam explosion tossed aside the reactor’s 1,000 ton concrete covering and released radioactive particles up to one and a half miles into the sky (Gould 38). The explosion and resulting fires caused 31 immediate deaths and over a thousand injuries, including radiation poisoning (Flavin 5). After the accident more than 135,000 people were evacuated from their Ukrainian homes, but the major fallout occurred outside of the Soviet Union’s borders. Smaller radioactive particles were carried in the atmosphere until they returned to earth via precipitation (Gould 43). The Soviets quickly seeded clouds to prevent rainfall over their own land, so most of the radioactivity burdened Western Europe, Scandinavia, and the Atlantic and Arctic Oceans (Flavin 12). This truly international disaster had far reaching effects; some of these were on health, the environment, social standards, and politics.
As the radiation settled over Europe, it had many effects. Since the Soviets did not alert anyone, Sweden, and to a lesser extent Poland, were the first nations to detect the radioactive cloud (Gould 40-41). By May 3 it had made its way all the way to Northern Scotland, and was also moving down into Eastern Europe (39). As radioactive particles dropped to the Earth’s surface, they were utilized by living orga...
... middle of paper ...
... 1987.
Gould, Peter. Fire in the Rain: The Democratic Consequences of Chernobyl. The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, 1990.
Herbert, Douglas. “Disputed Czech Nuclear Plant Counts Down to Launch.” September 21, 2000. last accessed 5/9/04 at http://edition.cnn.com/2000/WORLD/europe/09/21/czech.temelin/
http://www.cphpost.dk/get/55328.html last accessed 5/9/04
http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/16161/story.htm last accessed 5/9/04
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/nuclear-civil-01c.html last accessed 5/9/04
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/9702/msg00015.html last accessed 5/9/04
Lungescu, Oana. “EU to Fund Chernobyl Replacements.” September 26, 2000. last accessed 5/9/04 at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/913125.stm
Segerståhl, Boris (Ed.). Chernobyl: A Policy Response Study. Springer-Verlag: New York, 1991.
The engineers in Visit Sunny Chernobyl created a new frontier past the safety zone because they want to test the limits of the reactor. What the scientists didn’t account for is that fact that the reactors already had the potential of a dangerous chain reaction. (Blackwell 6) Consequently, their boundary destroying led to catastrophic consequences and the total annihilation of a land area because of massive radiation. Blackwell thought Chernobyl was so horrific he expressed that no one should visit without a “working understanding of radiation and how it’s measured” (Blackwell 7). These are some horrific consequences that followed from surpassing the
Imagine working with radioactive materials in a secret camp, and the government not telling you that this material is harmful to your body. In the book Plutopia: Nuclear Families, Atomic Cities, and the Great Soviet and American Plutonium Disasters by Kate Brown, she takes her readers on a journey to expose what happened in the first two cities that started producing plutonium. Brown is an Associate Professor of History at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. She has won a handful of prizes, such as the American Historical Association’s George Louis Beer Prize for the Best Book in International European History, and was also a 2009 Guggenheim Fellow. Brown wrote this book by looking through hundreds of archives and interviews with people, the evidence she found brought light to how this important history of the Cold War left a nuclear imprint on the world today.
Read, Piers Paul. Ablaze: The Story of the Heroes and Victims of Chernobyl. New York: Random House, 1993. Print.
Chernobyl, one word that still strikes pain and fear in the hearts of many, even after 28 years is still causing serious damage. It was largest nuclear disaster ever, Chernobyl was “. . . about 400 times more potent than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima during World War II . . .” (Walmsley “26 years on: helping Chernobyl's children”). The disaster was not immediately seen as a large threat, and this is why so many lives were taken or destroyed.
Wal-Mart business model hinges on a simply notion, to provide product and service to customers when and where they want them. This way of thinking defines the company as an innovator, searching for ways that will not only perpetuate their firm grasp on the retail industry, but also provide their consumers with low-cost options for products and supplies. The Wal-Marts supply chain is a global dynasty, it is known for being effective and efficient, technologically advanced, and logistically sound. These principles are some of the reasons Wal-mart is regarded as the top supply chain in the retail industry. They have distribution center located in a multitude of countries, this practice lends itself to have their products closer to the consumers, which allows the warehouse center to turn its total inventories over 8 times per year (Saporito, 2013). The supply chain is very successful at ensuring the lines of communication work properly throughout the entire network. Having suppliers that understand and communicate throughout each segment chain and share data are strategies Wal-Mart uses to manage its chain. To achieve this, Wal-Mart has its inventory replenishment at the center o...
Wal-Mart employs three basic beliefs which are respect for the individual, service to their customers, and striving for excellence (Hayden, 2002, p. 2). Wal-Mart’s corporate management strategy involves selling high quality and brand name products at the lowest price possible. In order to keep low prices, the company reduces costs by the use of advanced electronic technology and warehousing. It also negotiates deals for merchandise directly from manufacturers, eliminating the middleman. Wal-Mart’s new slogan is “save money, live better” (Wal-Mart Stores, n.d., p. 1). According to the company’s website, “saving money is a means of helping our customers live better. By offering the best possible prices on the products our customers need, we can help them afford a little something extra” (Wal-Mart Stores, n.d., p. 1). For each strategy that Wal-Mart promotes in flyer ads or television commercials, they measure the return on investment from these promotional strategies. If a strategy does not have a return on investment of a certain percentage in sales, those strategies are revamped or discarded. Backward expansion strategy is another key to Wal-Mart’s success. Unlike other retail stores, Wal-Mart opens their stores in a small town first before entering into metropolitan areas. “Wal-Mart spreads out like molasses from its Arkansas base by constructing new stores strategically located near distribution hubs and smaller towns, rather than leapfrogging across the nation like the other retailers” (Harper, 2004, p. 2).
The effects of the nuclear disaster that occurred at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Pripyat, Soviet Union are still experienced today even though more than thirty years have passed since the event. The event is known as “Chernobyl” and has gone down in history as one of the worst nuclear disasters to have ever occurred. (Hjelmgaard) Approximately 120,000 people lived within a 30- km radius but the radioactive release spread causing even more people to continue to experience effects in the present day. (Chemistry in Context) Extreme health issues, extreme environmental contamination, and health promoting organizations remain prevalent as a result of devastating Chernobyl.
Since the 7th grade, I have been a huge fan of the famous French-inspired realist and expressionist, Edvard Munch. His work is so full of passion and pain as well as shock and sadness. By gazing into the gloriously deep world of emotion he created, art lovers both young and old are amazed and drawn in.
The two paintings under discussion are by two famous artists of the 20th Century. They are Edvard Munch and Francis Bacon. Their paintings are based on the era of expressionism, where most painters were breaking from impressionism, which was embraced by the paintings of the 19th Century (Carl 47). Impressionism was based on paintings that only touched on the superficial objects, and not going in depth to explain the emotions around the paintings. Edvard Munch and Francis Bacon embraced expressionism to express subjective emotions, not just the objective part.
However, for most individuals, the most attractive factor is that Columbia University successfully provides quality experiences for its students in various aspects, especially through Fu Foundation.
In 2011 there is a city in Japan called Fukushima that had a nuclear meltdown and it was tragic, but there are people living there now 4 years later. Today there is no one that lives in Chernobyl the population is 0, however Fukushima's population is 283,145 and it still has radiation. This tells us that the Chernobyl meltdown was far more disastrous than the Fukushima meltdown. Chernobyl at this time was part of the Soviet Union which means it was part of a communist state. If you live in a communist state that means that it was more keep secret from the world. So when the meltdown happened there the world knew that it happened but they didn't know how bad it was and how bad it was for the
"Ten years after Chernobyl: What do we really know?." International Atomic Energy Agency. International Atomic Energy Agency, n.d. Web. 31 Mar 2011.
Hooks, B 2003, 'Teaching and Living in Hope', Teaching Community, Routledge, New York and London, pp. 1-12
Haley, David S., Jr. The Coming Age of Solar Energy. New York: Harper & Low, 2004. Print.
As Russia has industrialized in an attempt to compete for power and wealth, they have exploited an enormous amount of their natural resources. As a result, Russia is now dealing with a degrading environment, infrastructure issues and the various repercussions of their pollution. One major issue that Russia is dealing with is the nuclear damage from the Chernobyl nuclear reaction explosion. This explosion occurred in 1986 and has caused devastation, which continues to impact Russia’s environment almost 30 years later (Nurlybaev, & Maslyaev, 2011). The Chernobyl nuclear accident occurred in Ukraine and caused large quantities of radioactive particles spread over Russia. While this explosion was an accident, it affected over 500,000 people and continues to cause radiation and health problems today (2011). This explosion has impacted and contaminated some of Russia’s natural resources and will continue to do so until Russia begins to find a way to impose more environmentally friendly practices.