Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History of asylums essay
Reasons of social exclusions
Reasons of social exclusions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Effect of Ayslum Policy on Social Exclusion in the UK
This essay will discuss what asylum policy is, and how it has
increased levels of social exclusion in the UK, where I will use
specific examples from health and housing. Though, first, one must
understand the term asylum seekers which applies to someone who has
applied for asylum in this country, their application has been
accepted as worthy of consideration and is being processed. In
comparison, a refugee is someone who has been granted asylum or
‘exceptional leave to remain’ here. It is important to distinguish
between two because refugees have more rights than asylum seekers. For
example, a refugee can engage in paid employment.
Again, one must clarify what ‘social exclusion’ is. As defined by
Gordon and Townsend (2000), they believe that ‘social exclusion’ is
not a state but a process. In December 1997, the Social Exclusion Unit
(SEU) was set up for two years in the first instance, based in the
Cabinet Office and reporting to the Prime Minister. The aim of the
Unit is to develop coordinated policies to address social exclusion,
described as joined-up policies for joined-up problems. It has no
spending budget, since its purpose is to make recommendations to the
contributory government departments, with a view to directing existing
funding more effectively. The ‘socially’ excluded are understood to be
a group outside ‘mainsteam society’. Sometimes they are thought as
‘outdide society’ itself. (Gordon and Townsend 2000). Similarly, the
DSS report states that “social exclusion occurs where different
factors combine to trap individuals and areas in a spiral of
disadvantag...
... middle of paper ...
...ly similar to those of the host population,
although previous poor access to health care may mean that many
conditions have been untreated. Symptoms of psychological distress are
common but do not necessarily signify mental illness. Many refugees
experience difficulties in expressing health needs and in accessing
health care. Poverty and social exclusion have a negative impact on
health. Initially refugees will need help to make contact with health
and social support agencies. Professional interpreters are essential.
Time, patience, and a welcoming approach will break down many
barriers, but some refugees have problems that need specialist help
and support for which there are few resources, especially outside
London. It is crucial that these resources are developed before larger
numbers of asylum seekers are dispersed.
Migration has been found to have negative effects on mental health because of circumstances surrounding the move, circumstances of the actual passage, trouble adapting to the new culture, breaks in the migrant’s support system of friends and family, and disappointed expectations of social and economic acquisition.
Social exclusion is the exclusion of an individual from the current social system, their individual rights and privileges. This is usually a result of a person living in poverty due to circumstances he or she has no control over, or their own human error. Becoming socially excluded can also be the result of the individual belonging to a minority social group. Social exclusion refers to individuals whom are excluded from certain aspects of social life such as employment and social relations. This can be due to reasons such as whether or not the individual would like to participate in social activities, or whether he or she is unable to participate in social activities for reasons which are beyond their control, such as a disability (Burchandt et al. 2002). Social exclusion can be a major problem, studies have shown that being socially excluded from a group/s in fact activates particular areas of the brain, areas which would usually only be activated by physical pain (Eisenberger et al, 2003). Not only can social exclusion have negative effects on an individuals mental health and wellbeing, but it can also cause exploitation, oppression and marginality. Social exclusion also prevents equality, fairness and social justice.
Australia has constantly subsisted to be supposed by others as possessing a welcoming outlook to asylum seekers; despite this, the with the arrival of the first wave of boats carrying people seeking asylum in the 1990’s enforced the government to create essential alterations to its policies. The Labour Party has generally been perceived as liberal within its methodology to asylum seekers, contradicting this, with the cultivating distressing challenges being positioned on asylum seekers, their policies instigated to redirect the positions of the greater public and they developed far less accepting. The initial effect towards this issue was the modification in the current law to place asylum seekers in mandatory detentions. Subsequently after
Segregation is often a term overlooked by many in recent years, but still can have a detrimental effect on a country’s economy. Segregation often leads to poverty, which in turn, also has a negative effect on the economy, leading to a disadvantage in countries, particularly the United States and South Africa. Racial segregation is apparent in the United States and affects many cities, depending on the number of segments there are within a particular city. The effects of segregation cannot lie in the hands of one person, rather all the people that make an economy. In 1944, Gunnar Myrdal refers to racial segregation as “a basic term that has its influence in an indirect and impersonal way” (Massey, 1993). The following examples are how “simple increases in the rate of minority poverty leads to socioeconomic character of communities, which in turn leads to disadvantages caused by racial segregation” (Douglas, 1990).
The function and aim of justice is ostensibly to instil public protection and order, thereby creating a social mechanism aimed at achieving social progress. Martin King Luther’s comment about law and its existing purpose to disseminate justice and thereby its failure halting the flow of society’s progression , is particularly relevant to the current policies and procedures in place governing the asylum seekers. The aforementioned issues arising on the basis of Australia’s ineffective Human Rights agenda is a primary example which reflects Luther’s statements. While there are multiple ethical and justice issues that arise from Australia’s asylum seeker policy, this essay will examine the law and injustice with a specific focus on Australia's
The United States government’s continuation of a discriminatory policy poses people to question the extension of freedom in a nation where “all men are created equal” and that boasts about their protected rights. For 17 years, the United States government’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) policy barred homosexuals from openly serving in the armed forces. Military commanders could not ask military personnel about their sexual orientations or begin an investigation except upon the receipt of “credible information” of homosexual conduct. The policy was a compromise between President Bill Clinton, who sought to repeal the military's ban on gay personnel, and the opponents of that repeal
The social problem we have chosen to address is the mental health status of refugees. Refugees are exposed to a significant amount of trauma due to fear, war, persecution, torture, and relocating. The mental health illnesses that can affect refugees due to exposure to traumas include post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety. Research indicated that refugees relocating from war-torn countries are particularly vulnerable to mental health concerns because many have experienced early traumas and face further post-traumas after relocation (Cummings, et al., 2011). However, despite the prevalence of mental health issues concerning refugees, mental health needs often go unrecognized and untreated.
In 1954 Australia chose to commit to the 1951 Refugee Convention. This convention reinstated the dignity and equality of all persons, and therefore Australia became obliged to the acceptance and humane treatment of asylum seekers (Glendenning, 2015). However, over the recent years, asylum seeker policies such as ‘stop the boats’ have instead become a parliamentary campaign, ignoring the focus on humane treatment as well as the human, moral and legal obligations made clear in the Refugee Convention (Glendenning, 2015).
The current and previous Australian Governments have risked being responsible for crucial human rights violations when it comes to the ‘screening out’ process which can reject asylum seekers before their cases have even been correctly assessed. This process has returned asylum seekers back to Sri Lanka where they will face an uncertain fate due to violence and discrimination which also questions the legality of the whole process. Many asylum seekers who were ‘screened out’ had lost contact with their loved ones who had eventually relocated by the time they were able to communicate with them via telephone. One asylum seeker had told an inquiry that he had lost contact with his wife and children whilst in the Woomera detention centre as they did not allow the asylum seekers to contact their families. In 2005, during the Howard government, the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC) found that separately detaining asylum seekers violated international human rights
The detention of immigrants applying for asylum has become commonplace in high-income Western society, and even in low-income societies, some completely funded from higher-income neighboring countries (Kotsioni et al. 2013; Silverman, Massa 2012). Detention facilities are utilized as a deterrent,
Over the past 50 years Norway has had an increase in immigrant population. After the economy boomed in the 1960’s, more people began moving to the country in hopes of a better life. This then increased immigration because more people were migrating to be with their families. When immigration levels hit a high in 1975, the government enforced an “immigration stop” restricting people from being able to move into the country. In 1988 an Immigration Act was passed which then allowed immigrants to enter but under certain conditions. (Cooper, 2005). Although immigration levels remained constantly high throughout the years, recently Norway has seen a decline in asylum-seeking applications. Just within this past month of March, application levels declined 39% and 40% in February (Asylum applications take a dive, 2010). Lately, the more recent asylum seekers have been people persecuted for political opinions or religious beliefs from far less developed countries like Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, and Eritrea (Norway, 2009).
Fell, Peter and Hayes, Debra. (2007). What are they Doing Here? A Critical Guide to Asylum and Immigration, Birmimgham, Venture Press
The Causes of Social Exclusion Social exclusion refers to inequality in society, where individuals or groups may be cut off in involvement with the wider society. Social exclusion can take a number of forms. An individual or group may be excluded due to their age cohert, gender, race, educational background, neighbourhood, class and more. A class in social terms can be defines as a large scale grouping of people who share common economic resources which strongly influence the type of lifestyle they are able to lead. (Gidden, 2001 p.282)
Johnson, M, Haluk, S, Williams, C (2002). Social Work and Minorities: European Perspectives. London: Routledge
In relation to social transformation I have gathered materials that focusses on programs provided for ‘refugees’ living in New Zealand. The purpose of my findings are based on the societies support for ‘refugees’ in terms of human security and directions of life before settling in their new destination. There are stories about ‘refugees’ that need to be shared and stories that need to be forgotten, because it can produce controversy within the society or the universe. But where can these ‘refugees’ go if the place they call home is unsafe or too risky for the lives of their families and for themselves. It’s hard enough to migrate into a new country, but it is devastating for refugees who have experienced the loss of homes and loved ones.