The Difference Between Leadership And Followership

Leadership and followership are two concepts that cannot be independent of each other. The former refers to an influence among leaders and their team members who are interested in bringing real changes that are vested in their mutual purpose. Whether the interest is in government, business, education, or any other entity that brings human beings into some form of organization, there the is a need for individuals who can efficiently manage agencies to achieve their objectives. However, leadership exists in an era in which there is the need for regulated and improved institutions that are willing to be led. It is possible for a leader to cause problems single-handedly, but it is almost always never possible for them to make progress on their

Mostly, it is unlikely that an institution will move forward without cooperation from one side of the divide. For a leader to be an inspiration and be able to lead, the followers must be willing to be inspired and directed. On the other hand, excellent and skilled followers can promote ethical leadership, by always keeping the leader on his or her track. Unfortunately, in the times that we are living in, the art has become a scarcity. A familiar enigma that exists in leadership today is that most of the people who gravitate towards leadership are lacking in the decency and humility that is naturally expected of a leader. On the other hand, the humble and decent people who society thinks will take up leadership roles usually feel tense, cannot cope with the criticism, and cannot put up with the thanklessness of the position (Kelley,

The requirements of effective leadership far outweigh those of followership. The psychological payback for being a follower is also much more than the mental costs. Developing followership skills is more comfortable and less demanding than developing leadership skills. In human history, for example, people stayed in nomadic clusters, which offered protection, survival, and food. The groups with good leaders and followers had higher chances of survival compared to those with weak or inadequate leaders and followers. The physical benefits of being a good follower were by far better than the psychological costs, and this explained why they would remain attached to the cluster for days on end. Followers who were not satisfied with the leaders of their groupings had the choice to fight for the leadership position or to join another