The Devil And Tom Walker Analysis

860 Words2 Pages

In Stephen Vincent Benet's fictional story " The Devil and Daniel Webster," Jabez Stone was an unlucky man sells his soul to the devil for the desperate need to provide for his family. However, in the fictional story "The Devil and Tom Walker," written by Washington Irving, Tom made a deal with the Devil out of greed. Yet, both "The Devil and Daniel Webster" and "The Devil and Tom Walker" were influenced by social values, which did not change drastically over the one hundred thirteen year time gap. Essentially, both of these stories teach lessons in which a deal with the Devil leads to serious consequences, either in death or in near death experiences. In Washington Irving's "The Devil and Tom Walker," Walker is motivated by greed and money to succeed in life, which was influenced by ethical, social, and cultural impacts of the New Englanders along with their attitudes in the early eighteenth century. Essentially, Tom Walker was selling his soul to the Devil for experience, knowledge, and treasure to be at the level of the wealthy. New Englanders at the time were so driven towards money, land, and power that they would do anything to get their hands on it. Some whites would …show more content…

The moral of the fictional story "The Devil and Tom Walker," written by Washington Irving is not to base success in life as how much money you make. Considering Tom Walker was "looking" for money and money was his thought of the "American Dream." Where as in "The Devil and Daniel Webster," by Stephen Vincent Benet the moral is to make decisions based on thought, not emotion. Due to Jebez Stone selling his soul for the better of his family, not thinking of the consequences after the deal. Both stories differentiate in a sense that Tom Walker did not need money, he wanted money and Jabez Stone was in fact desperate to

Open Document