The Death Penalty In America's Judicial System

724 Words2 Pages

Since the beginning of civilized human society, law and order has regulated the populace of the world. Any person who has broken this natural order is judged and sentenced for their crime. The sentencing of criminals to death for heinous and inhuman actions has been the norm of society for centuries. Of course, with any action concerning human life, it is a controversial topic with strong arguments on both sides. Even though the death penalty is viewed upon with disgust by its opposition, it has more benefits than flaws. With universal application of the death penalty in the United States, America’s judicial system will thrive by deterring violent crime. The death penalty is the ultimate warning to criminals who are about to commit a crime. Before an individual performs an illegal action, they are logically forced to assume all risk that accompanies the action. By knowing this, the convicted murderers of the world should lose all natural rights as human beings. Abolitionists of the death penalty glaze over this point. Due …show more content…

They argue that death is not the most appropriate answer to murder. If death is not the most appropriate option, then what is? The problem with their point is the obvious lack of equality in punishment in the judicial system. Petty crime is not treated the same way as a severe crime. The only punishment now available is prison time. If a criminal were to mug an individual, take their wallet, and beat them, they might as well should kill the individual for there would be little difference in their judgement. The sentence would be merely more years in prison. Thus the only way to be fair would be the death penalty. Such law that expresses this point is Hammurabi’s code, which is the earliest recorded law system in the world. This code states that law is as simple as “an eye for an eye.” This law was used as deterrent for other crimes such as petty theft

Open Document