The Crucible Reputation Essay

416 Words1 Page

Everyone is concerned with their reputation and how people view them. People could know nothing personal about someone, but immediately recall their reputation and the rumors about them. Having one bad story to one’s good name is often much more memorable and impactful than dozens of good ones. In The Crucible, Danforth refuses to postpone the hangings of seven individuals, in order to keep the good reputation of the court and himself. Reputation is an aspect of life that everyone cares about because it is the societal definition of someone. People often will go to great lengths and “invest substantial resources to maintain a good reputation” such as adapting a “cooperative behaviour…that is individually costly, but socially beneficial” (Pfeiffer). This is due to the fact that reputations are eternal, unlike its human counterpart. Even after death, people are remembered for certain …show more content…

During the study by Pfeiffer and his team, they find that a bargaining system goes on when trying to better (or maintain) one’s reputation. People act certain ways, in contradiction to their true feelings or “forego social norms”, for the betterment of their reputation (Pfeiffer). Deep down, Danforth knows hanging the innocents with “[their] names…given out” is wrong, but he cannot “pardon or postponement” because “Twelve are already executed” and that would “[speak] a floundering on [his] part” ruining the just name of the court and himself (Miller 129). Danforth has worked a long time for the court system, and having his reputation ruined now would be outright embarrassing. With the novel as an example and reputation at such a great societal importance, the extent of the actions someone would take to have a good name is vastly

Open Document