The Crucible Play Vs Movie Essay

804 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Similarities of the crucible play and movie and differences

Comparing the play: The Crucible and the film based off it, it’s found that they are very similar to one another. Like all book to movie transitions, there were a couple places where things didn’t line up, that the movie was doing something different fromt the book/play. Although there are a few differences between the movie and the play, to movie does a respectable job of recreating the play.
Differences are lacking when comparing the play and the movie, but a couple small one can be noticed. For example, the movie cut a few characters lines short, and changes the lines composition a bit to make the dialogue and storyline easier to understand. This is most apparently seen when looking at Chever. He was far more prominent in the play, acting …show more content…

The play delivers a more toned back version of the story, more calm and relaxed, while the movies delivery is a hard hitting, dramatic one. Scene the play is more complex than its movie counterpart, it can be harder to get a grasp on the story and fully understand everything that is happening, and which character is doing what. The movie offers a clearer view of what is going on. Being able to recognize characters and locations, plus all of the dialogue that was present in the play, the movie is much more simplified, which does not negatively affect the story, but rather simply helps the viewer understand the plot, and what is currently happening in the story.
The way the opening of the story in the play and in the movie also differ slightly. It opens around the same premence: the group of girls dancing in the woods.The movie opens on the girls leaving to go dance and shows how is all plays out, showing the whole affair. The play on the other hand, starts when the dancing in the woods has already taken place and is explained to the reader through flashbacks and the girls talking about what they had

Show More
Related

  • The Crucible Movie Vs Movie Essay

    772 Words  | 2 Pages

    I’m sure you’ve debated with yourself many times the book or the movie. This essay proves to you why the movie version is so much better. John Proctor was without a single doubt the best character in The Crucible. The film did an impeccable job of conveying a much better picture of what truly happened in the years 1692 and 1693. Even though many people may consider the book to be the better version of The Crucible their reasons do not compare to the reasons I have written to prove that the movie is the best version. The movie did a much better version of giving us more details and more personality out of the characters such as John Proctor. In the book, John Proctor was a dry and dull character but in the movie, he is incredibly influential.

    Read More

  • An Analytical Essay Explaining Why Arthur Miller Wrote The Crucible

    740 Words  | 2 Pages

    Authors often have underlying reasons for giving their stories certain themes or settings. Arthur Miller’s masterpiece, The Crucible, is a work of art inspired by actual events as a response to political and moral issues. Set in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692, The Crucible proves to have its roots in events of the 1950’s and 1960’s, such as the activities of the House Un-American Committee and the “Red Scare.” Though the play provides an accurate account of the Salem witch trials, its real achievement lies in the many important issues of Miller’s time that it dealswith.

    Read More

  • To Kill a Mockingbird: The Book vs. The Movie

    833 Words  | 2 Pages

    Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.

    Read More

  • Romeo and Juliet - Movie vs. Book

    894 Words  | 2 Pages

    Another major difference in the mood of the play and the movie is in the funeral

    Read More

  • The Crucible Movie Analysis

    582 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of the most well known plays of today's generation is The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller. The play was written in 1953 about the Salem Witch Trials that occurred in the late 1600's. Arthur did a careful job of researching the events that took place, and was able to portray them in his own words. About 40 years later, a movie was created about Arthur's play, directed by Nicholas Hytner. Although both portrayals had some major characteristics of each other, there were also some major differences as well. Both Miller and Hytner agreed on some things for The Crucible, they disagreed on other things as well.

    Read More

  • Differences Between Romeo And Juliet Play And Movie

    531 Words  | 2 Pages

    Now in the play in act 5 a total of four of the characters died but in the movie only two died in Act 5. The only real similarities are that Romeo and Juliet die and Balthazar told Romeo that Juliet died. At the same time the differences are that in the movie Romeo never went to the apothecary witch in the play he did. Also In the movie when Romeo and Balthasar went to the Capulet tomb Romeo never gave his servant the reason why he did go into the tomb and he opened the tomb with a boulder but in the play he told Balthasar that he was going to give juliet a final kiss and retrieve a ring from her. Romeo also opened the tomb the a iron crowbar. And the biggest Difference was that Lady Montague died from grief but in the movie she lived and Romeo never fought Parris in the movie at the Capulet

    Read More

  • Differences Between Midsummer Night's Dream Movie And Play

    382 Words  | 1 Pages

    A bold difference that stands out throughout the movie is the different time period. The play takes place in ancient Athens, while one can infer that the movie version takes place sometime

    Read More

  • Doubt: Comparing the Play and Movie

    1022 Words  | 3 Pages

    The differences between the movie doubt and the play have significant differences that would influence ones opinion about certain characters and situations in the story. Though the differences are few one would agree that at least one of these differences are game changers or at the very least they get you thinking and having doubts of your own.

    Read More

  • Differences Between The Crucible Book And Movie

    928 Words  | 2 Pages

    In conclusion The Crucible book and movie were very much the same and the differences that were present don’t have much of an effect on the viewer. All of the scenes that were added were put there for a dramatic effect. Especially the outdoor scenes in the movie gave a different presence than all indoor scenes would have. Overall, the movie and book were very similar, but the differences added to the movie gave it extra

    Read More

  • The Crucible Theme Essay

    955 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Well, all the plays that I was trying to write were plays that would grab an audience by the throat and not release them, rather than presenting an emotion which you could observe and walk away from.” by Arthur Miller. All great works provide a way to reach in and grab the audience through the reoccurring themes like, greed, jealousy, reputation and hypocrisy. Arthur Miller had one of those great works and it was called “The Crucible”. The play was based off of the witch trials that happened in Salem in the year of 1962. Some of the characters were actual characters involved in the witch trials. Arthur Miller wrote this play during the time of the “Red Scare”. Miller wrote The Crucible because he wanted to turn the The Salem Witch Trials into

    Read More

  • Cat on a Hot Tin Roof

    949 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are many minor differences between the play and the movie of Cat on a Hot Tin Roof. When converting the play to a movie many aspects were lost. One thing that changed was the language. The movie laws at the time required that all ages would be able to watch them. In the movie all the cussing and many of the jokes were removed because they were inappropriate. In the play, Big Daddy’s favorite word is crap, but in the play it was changed to bull. Along with the language there were other small changes added to the movie. In the movie, Big Daddy and Big Mama arrive in a plane, but in the play they all meet at the house. In the movie, Doctor Baugh tells Brick that the report was positive for cancer for Big Daddy. In the play, Maggie is the one that tells Brick about the cancer (Williams 39). Unlike the play where everything was in Brick’s room, the party for Big Daddy was held outside (Williams 48). In the play, after Big Mama learns of Big Daddy’s cancer, the doctor gives the morphine to Mae and the rest of the group. In the movie, the morphine is given to Big Daddy. Also in the play, Big Mama refuses to give Big Daddy the morphine, but in the movie she wanted to give it to him after she saw the pain Big Daddy was in (Williams 140). The relationships between the characters were changed slightly in the movie. In the movie, we saw that...

    Read More

  • The Crucible - Comparing Play And Movie

    978 Words  | 2 Pages

    There were some scenes added or adapted in the movie as opposed to the play. First, the large group of "stricken" girls, which indeed had a greater number than did the group in the play, left the church meeting at the beginning of the movie to see about Betty's condition. Betty seemed to be much more violent in the movie and she tried to jump out of the window, which did not occur in the play. These details were most likely added to ...

    Read More

  • Macbeth Vs Play

    726 Words  | 2 Pages

    Characterisation is vastly different in the film when compared to the play. This, however, is done so as to make more sense to a modern

    Read More

  • William Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream

    1280 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...om that point on the play began to slow down and unravel the conflicts. This was a play I which everything happened very quickly. The problem was presented right at the beginning, the conflict was established along with subsidiary conflicts resulting from our central conflict itself, and the was then resolved rather quickly. The theme of conflict was apparent throughout the play as well, and is the cause of the problems that befall the characters. Overall there was never really a difference or a change in the main idea or conflict or setting of the play to the film, besides a few content difference and alterations with he context and words of the play to the film, I believe that the film was a very good portrayal of the play, the plot and other literary elements used in drama. All were established and addressed the final resolve at the end in A Midsummer Night Dream.

    Read More

  • Film Versus Theatre Presentations of William Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing

    1430 Words  | 3 Pages

    Branaugh and the company director both made many choices, which influenced their performances. I enjoyed the movie more the play because it was not only full of funny lines and puns, but the actors and the setting were amazing. They movie seemed to flow more for me and I enjoyed being able to see the characters in a serene setting without having to visualize it all. Shakespeare's play Much Ado About Nothing can be interpreted, acted, read, and visualized in different ways, but I thought that Kenneth Branaugh brought together an amazing cast and performance.

    Read More

More about The Crucible Play Vs Movie Essay

Open Document