The Crucible And Reverend Hale Analysis

1759 Words4 Pages

A person’s character can have a lot of influences in weather or not they can maintain their morals. In the play The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, the town of Salem, Massachusetts Bay Colony is taken over by witch trials. They are started by young girls who accuse people of being witches in order to avoid getting into trouble for having been caught dancing naked in the woods. Reverend Hale, who is considered an expert in witches, is called in to assist the courts with the trials and give his opinion on the severity of the situation. At first he believes these cases are true, however he changes his opinion when the credibility of the accusers come into question, and he also denounces the courts proceedings. Various townspeople believe that the girls are lying, and some people try to stand up to them but end up being accused of being a witch and dying. The internal struggles of the character play a large part in determining whether or not they will be successful or not in standing up to the girls, and if they will be able to maintain their morals. Two of the people who stood up to the girls are Mary Warren and Reverend John Hale; Reverend Hale was able to maintain his morals by looking at the situation for a neutral prospective and going by the facts, whereas Mary Warren, a girl who was one of the accusers, was unable to successfully maintain her morals and stop the unjust trials because she was fearful of the other girls, she is self-centered, and she had no confidence. Reverend Hale’s Character traits aided him in maintain his morals because they gave him the strength that he needed to do the right thing. In the beginning he saw signs that he interpreted as actual work of the devil and honestly thought that Salem was infested with... ... middle of paper ... ...outcries, and they would each have different things happen to each of their morals; Reverend Hale was successful at maintaining his ethics throughout the play because of his insightfulness, and neutrality, however his orals did encounter a speed bump due to his trusting nature, whereas Mary Warren Was horrible at maintain her morals because she was self-centered, fearful, and unconfident. John Hale maintained his morals thru thick and thin as the play went on, he even switched sided as soon as he knew for sure that the side that he saw then currently supporting was wrong. Mary Warren was unsuccessful in maintain her morals from the begging because she knew that the trials were wrong from the begging yet she did nothing. This play highlights the fact that people make choices based off of their personality and current state, and these choices may or may not be just.

Open Document