The Consequences Of The Destruction Of Desire

1524 Words4 Pages

Throughout literature, subject matters of desire and destruction often go hand in hand. From desire of destruction to the destruction of desire, there are many ways the subject matter of desire and destruction are constructed into themes. Tennessee Williams in A Streetcar Named Desire and William Shakespeare in Macbeth take similar stances in this discussion throughout the ages, focusing their views on the destruction of desire. They claim that absolute desire, desire with complete disregard for the consequences of their actions, or at least without through consideration, leads to absolute destruction, whether it be destruction of their life, their self, or hope of obtaining their goal. Tennessee Williams, in A Streetcar Named Desire, considers …show more content…

Stella and Stanley’s relationship is one based purely on, as Blanche describes it, “brutal desire – just – Desire!” (81). They treat one another without respect, with Stella calling her husband offensive slurs like Pollack and him beating her. However, because of their deep desire for each other, Stella quickly forgives Stanley for his wrong doings, growing his power over her. When his desire for power builds and he is sure that Stella is dependent on him, he rapes Blanche. When Stella hears her sisters story she calls for Blanche to be institutionalized. While it is clear to the reader through her hesitation in sending Blanche away that Stella knows Stanley really did rape her sister, she cannot bring herself give up Stanley and acknowledge the truth. In this action, she has ruined any trust that Blanche had in her and forever destroyed their relationship because of her selfish desire for Stanley. A similar, yet unique theme can be found in Shakespeare’s Macbeth. While A Streetcar Named Desire focuses on destruction by the hand of others reacting to a different characters’ greed, Macbeth acknowledges a different aspect. Macbeth focuses more on the downfall of characters through self-reflection of their actions and the realization of their wrong doing, as shown by Lady Macbeth, or belief in their absolute right to get what they …show more content…

Though tentative at first, it is clear the Macbeth desires to be king. As explained by Hunt, his current, newly appointed title is not enough for him as “ the augmentation of titles cannot appease the insatiability of desire, which never rests content with the new title but continues to feel the pain of existential hunger, of mortal incompleteness.” (hunt), leading him to desire for greater power. While the witches mention Macbeth’s possible rise to kingship through the death of Duncan, it is Macbeth who jumps to the possibility of the king’s murder saying, “If good, why do I yield to that suggestion Whose horrid image doth unfix my hair And make my seated heart knock at my ribs, Against the use of nature? Present fears Are less than horrible imaginings. (1.3.138-142).” There are many ways that the king could die, yet it is his desire for power leads him to pick the speediest path to the king’s end. Macbeth does in fact end up killing the king, as well as his best friend to protect his claim to power. From there he quickly becomes drunk with his rule and starts to terrorize the land, forgetting his morals and saying that he’ll just do whatever he feels when ever he feels like it. These actions lead to his death along with the many others who starve or bleed under his rule. Because of his desire for power, Macbeth causes the destruction of his soul, the end of his life

Open Document