The Case For Reparations By Ta-Nehisi Coatess Analysis

1274 Words3 Pages

Ta-Nehisi Coates article titled The Case for Reparations is a lengthy article about different issues that faced the black community from the past to the present and the struggle to acquire reparations for them. Coates brought issues back to light after they were bury by society. He mention things that I was aware of and things I had no idea happened. It was an enlighten piece that should be recognized for its accomplishments in discussing the issues of the past that still occur in the present. Coates starts his article with a verse from the book of Deuteronomy. The verse states that if you brought a slave that is to serve six years, you must let him go. Not only must you free the slave, you must also furnish him and provided him with means …show more content…

This is amazing passage that really sets the tone for the rest of the paper. It’s ironic and inspirational in every way. Coates makes a connection about this when he referenced Nathaniel Bacon’s rebellion in which white and black indentured servants banded together to fight for their rights. The sad thing is that many whites forget today they too faced discrimination and struggled for their rights. Rather it was the holocaust, women’s right movement or even union strikes, we all had to fight for something as Americans since the beginning. While, Coates focus on Chicago’s struggle for rights in housing in terms of blacks and whites, there are more diverse examples of this in other cities. New York City is home to many neighborhoods of varying backgrounds and races. New York City has everything from Little Italy to Chinatown, but are those places restricted to people of that ethnic background? Legally, the answer is no. You cannot be denied housing because of your background or beliefs. However, this does not stop people from being denied anyway. New York City, while the most culturally diverse city, is also the most segregated. Many may see this isn’t a issue but it …show more content…

To make matters worse, they only was able to renegotiate housing right with 106 homeowners out of the 552 who also supported the movement. For the unlucky ones, they lost everything and was forced to move. To me, the documentary that placed on article was too cheery and lenient in the fact that this movement risked the homes and hundreds of black residents in Chicago. The negative facts of this movement and the results still prevalent in the present were touch upon by words on the screen, instead of being discussed with the ones who won. What happened to the people who lost their home? Did the ones who win help them? Or did they reap of their own benefits and carried own with their lives in their newly acquired home? It would have been nice to see their prospective of losing their goal, and the idea that they did not stick together like they promised. Not all movements are picture perfect and I think it would have been a refreshing take on this issue if it focus more on the loss than the few

Open Document