..This is the post that has been made by the 'Bangladesh Cricket Board ' Lawyer Mr. Mustafizur Rahman Khan in regard of Bangladeshi bowler Taskin Ahmed 's embargo. Hopefully, after reading the entire post you can able to understand that how much facetious verdict that have been made by the so called "ICC officials".
"Generally, I do not give posts about my professional work, but since this issue concerns Taskin and the Tigers, I feel constrained to share this.
Since Taskin and Sunny were reported, I have been consulted by BCB regarding its response. Initially, ICC was insisting that they be tested immediately, i.e. on 9 March. I helped BCB draft correspondence pointing out that the testing could be deferred under the Regulations until after the preliminary matches. ICC concurred, and Taskin could play against Ireland and Oman.
I have now gone through Taskin 's Independent Assessment Report, which BCB forwarded to me. I also revisited the ICC Regulations for the Review of Bowlers Reported with Suspected Illegal Bowling Actions, and also Taskin 's initial Match Officials ' Report which I saw earlier.
The Assessment did not find anything illegal with Taskin 's stock and yorker deliveries. With respect to the 9 bouncers he was asked to bowl, they found that 3 were bowled using an illegal bowling action.
Here is where it gets interesting:
First, Regulation 2.2.6 provides that "(d)uring the Independent Assessment, the Player shall be required to replicate the specific bowling action for which he/she was reported." The footage of his bowling in the match where he was reported is available. It shows that during the course of the match, he did not bowl any bouncer. Not even one. So, he could not have been reported...
... middle of paper ...
...yer employed an Illegal Bowling Action during the Independent Assessment in respect of a specific type of delivery only, other than his stock delivery, the Player will be allowed to continue bowling in International Cricket but subject to the warning that should he continue to bowl any of the specific type(s) of delivery for which he has been found to have an Illegal Bowling Action, he will run the risk of being cited a second time". Since Taskin 's stock delivery has been found legal, and only 3 of his 9 bouncers illegal, he can, at best, be warned, and not suspended.
In short, Taskin is the victim of a miscarriage of justice.
I have advised BCB to use the above to seek a review under Regulation 2.3.1, and later escalate it in arbitration up to the Court of Arbitration for Sports in Switzerland.
There is a limit to such farce. Faizlamir ekta shima acche."
The Missouri State Board of Nursing had several violation and disciplinary actions set for a hearing to review. The violation against one nurse was a second offense. A disciplinary action is for a first-time offense. Each action taken by the board is done with a group discussion and later deliberated to come to a final decision. The violators are then notified by mail. The two I chose are a violation and then a disciplinary action.
The decision of the Supreme Court regarding the use of screening procedures to student athletes has been incorrect. . After an intense beginnin...
During the submission by the amicus curiae it was evident that the police might not have put much interest in arresting the suspect given they did not follow due procedures. However had the suspect been arrested near his premises the case would take another
Mitchell, George. "REPORT TO THE COMMISSIONER OF BASEBALL OF AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION INTO THE ILLEGAL USE OF STEROIDS AND OTHER PERFORMANCE ENHANCING SUBSTANCES BY PLAYERS IN MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL ." . N.p.. Web. 4 Mar 2014. .
It would be hard to hold my ground, but I would explain to the athlete that there could be further damage that we aren’t seeing. We don’t want of risk anything so we are going to hold you on the side lines for another 5-10 min. and then re perform the tests and compare the results. If there is any sign of brain damage than he is out for the rest of the game. If the test are once again all negative and he feels fine without any headaches or balance troubles than we can reassess the situation and see if he is able to go back into the game.
... decision also brings suspiscion about whether or not if things go south is he going to take any accountability. In conclusion, this case truly represents the use of unauthorized practice of law.
After the release of Foul! BBC television exposé by Jennings and BBC producer Roger Corke for the BBC news program Panorama was broadcast. In this hour-long program, screened on 11 June 2006, Jennings and the Panorama team agree that SeppBlatter was being investigated by Swiss police over his role in a secret deal to repay more than £1m worth of bribes bagged by football officials.
... In Andy’s case he will now strike against the person who did not let him tryout in an illegal manner.
It is arguably one of the most debatable issues in sports today. “Doping” as it sometimes referenced as, refers to the use of a prohibited subst...
Desbordes, Michel. "Measuring Fair Play And Planning Long Term." International Journal Of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship 15.2 (2014): 77. SPORTDiscus with Full Text. Web. 17 Feb. 2014.
With the help from the team of doctor the jury was able to come up with a verdict.
In short, it is a case of the petitioners that the deceased Mahendra Mukundrao Bansode was working as driver with respondent no.01 on his vehicle Ape auto rickshaw bearing registration no. MH-23-X-4372. On 18/07/2014 as per say of respondent no.01, the deceased Mahendra Mukundrao Bansode was proceeding in the said Ape auto rickshaw from Latur to Lokhandi Sawargaon. He was doing his work as per the instruction and directions of respondent no. 01. While coming from Latur to Lokhandi Sawargaon, when he reached near Selu Amba, at that time, suddenly one dog came in front of the auto rickshaw. The deceased tried to save the said dog and lost his control over the auto rickshaw. In the result, the said auto rickshaw turn turtle and the deceased
Sport is never far from controversy. Whether it be alcohol-fuelled misbehaviour, allegations of drug abuse or inappropriate public musings on a thorny political issue, the national press is filled to the brim with sports stars dragging the image of their employers — and the sports they represent — through the proverbial mud.
A series of high profile scandals in early to mid 60s forced issue on agenda of government and sports bodies. The IOC had been wary of government interest and involvement in sport and Olympic sport and they then established Medical commission in 61 and in 62, they decide they would take a stand against doping in sports. the Convention of European Sport Governing Bodies was scheduled for January 1963, at which a definition of doping was set up. This was adopted by the IOC:
Møller, Verner. The Ethics of Doping and Anti-Doping: Redeeming the Soul of Sport?Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2009. Print.