The Argument For Motion: Coach F. Thomas Aquinas

706 Words2 Pages

Coach F.
Thomas Aquinas paper
Thomas Aquinas was born in 1225 in Roccasecca, Italy. He grew up with eight siblings and he was the youngest. When he was just five he was sent to go strain with monks and there he was describes as a very witty child. He went to school at a Benedictine house in Naples. While there he studied some of Aristotle’s work. Once he finished with all of his school he became committed to always going places, teaching, and writing. He grew up in a time period where people were trying to comprehend the difference between faith and reason. Since Thomas was a true believer he began to use all of the things he used while growing up and while in school to develop theories and reasons why God was real. One of his arguments was call the argument of motion.
I agree with Thomas Aquinas’s argument for motion. This argument is him talking about everything on the earth that has a motion. He states that things move when potential motion becomes actual motion. This is him …show more content…

Premise (2), "Whatever is moved is moved by another," conflicts with the notion of God in this argument as that of something unmoved, i.e., that of the Unmoved Mover. God, then, is an the exception to the truth of premise (2). Nevertheless, cannot God move or act? If God is pure actuality, then it would seem to follow that God can't do anything, for God is already all that God could be. If, then, God is already all that God can be, there's no potential for God to be able to act or be in any way different from what God is. If God is claimed to have a privileged status and not subject to the firse premise, then the argument becomes viciously circular.” This paragraph is also full of things that people were not able to fully understand back then. One example is “whatever is moved is moved by another.” What they most likely did not understand is what is moving the first thing. Thomas knew that so he explained all of that later in

Open Document