The Alamo: Book And Movie Comparison

526 Words2 Pages

The Patriot and The Alamo, although told from slightly different points of views--The Patriot from the perspective of a fictional, and average civilian character and The Alamo from the perspective of actual historical and prominent figures--showcases the ability of films to persuade viewers into rooting for one character, while opposing another. The characters, to be more specific, are the hero, whose role in a story is to be a character who is admired or idealized for courage or noble qualities, and the villain, whose role in a story is to be a malicious character or a character who opposes the hero in the story.
The Patriot establishes it's hero and villain through a particular scene, where the younger son of the protagonist, Benjamin Martin, is cruelly shot by the antagonist, Colonel Tavingtion, in an attempt to save his older brother. This scene not only sets up the narrative of the righteous Americans vs the villainous British but also finds a way to connect with the audience on a more personal level. Instead of highlighting a battle scene as an introductory conflict, the director chose to focus on the story of an individual, Benjamin Martin, because it is part of human nature to …show more content…

For example, The Patriot is mostly a fictional story, which, while includes a few general truths about the American Revolution, fails to include important allies such as the French, important battles, and even inaccurately adds events, such as the burning of a church full of innocent civilians by Colonel Tavington, who was also fictional. It is alright to look to movies to gain awareness of historical events people may not know of, however, to consider movies as good history would be foolish since they are mostly a creation of the director's vision or opinion and not factual information. This would leave viewers with a false impression of

More about The Alamo: Book And Movie Comparison

Open Document