Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Topics on how American film affects culture
Topics on how American film affects culture
Comparison of cultures in the east and west
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Topics on how American film affects culture
An absurd and chilling documentary directed by Joshua Oppenheimer about how the perpetrators of one atrocious political purge are still enjoying impunity along with power in public even after more than 50 years. With an unorthodox filmmaking process at its center what is shown through that process is as hilariously terrible as the corrupt social environment surrounding it. Although watching this film it may seem too absurd to be reality it did in fact occur. In the opening scenes we are given a brief history lesson in 1965 the Indonesian government was overthrown by the military. Anyone opposed to the military dictatorship could be accused of being a communist. We learn in less than a year more than one million “communists” were killed with …show more content…
The killers in “The Act of Killing” seem to have no interest in denying or minimizing their crimes. On the contrary, they are candid, even boastful about what they have done, and eager to share their recollections of torture and murder. The documentary focuses on Anwar Congo who originally was a small time gangster who then came to lead the most notorious death squad in North Sumatra. When we are first introduced text appears on screen next to him his name Anwar Congo and title executioner. Responsible for killing an unknown number of suspected communists he’s given the chance to recount his experiences in a novel way, capitalizing on the enthusiasm he and others showed when discussing what they had done. Oppenheimer has the former Indonesian death-squad leaders reenact their mass-killings in whichever cinematic genres they wish, whether its musical number about their victims thanking them for killing them or a classic Hollywood crime …show more content…
All throughout the film appears masterfully crafted flowing from each scene to the next smoothly. The quality of the film itself runs counter to the scenes shot by the thugs in which awful makeup, shoddy special effects, and over the top costumes are used. The subjects state that they were influenced by American crime movies such as Scarface and The Godfather. They would watch these films and then try to emulate the characters they saw on screen recreating hellish murder scenes with whatever unfortunate “Communist” was given over to them by the government. Although they cite Scarface and The Godfather as direct influences on both their tactics and their swanky fashion sense. It's also clear that their madness stems from something deeper in the country's fabric. They were not driven mad by the movies they saw but rather through the country’s systemic fanaticism and brutality, which is celebrated by both the politicians and the media who merrily praise the men's noble "extermination"
The Murderers Are Among Us, directed by Wolfe Gang Staudte, is the first postwar film. The film takes place in Berlin right after the war. Susan Wallner, a young women who has returned from a concentration camp, goes to her old apartment to find Hans Mertens living there. Hans took up there after returning home from war and finding out his house was destroyed. Hans would not leave, even after Susan returned home. Later on in the film we find out Hans was a former surgeon but can no longer deal with human suffering because of his traumatic experience in war. We find out about this traumatic experience when Ferdinand Bruckner comes into the film. Bruckner, Hans’ former captain, was responsible for killing hundreds
Murder at the Margin is a murder mystery involving various economic concepts. The story takes place in Cinnamon Bay Plantation on the Virgin Island of St. John. It is about Professor Henry Spearman, an economist from Harvard. Spearman organizes an investigation of his own using economic laws to solve the case.
In "The Most Dangerous Game" and "Bargain" murder happens. Certainly, murder is one of the most vile, inhuman crimes a person can commit. Many people commit it willfully and wantonly, but few get away with it without being suspected. General Zaroff got away with murder quite frequently, and Mr. Baumer also did. They were both good at it. Zaroff and Mr. Baumer were the most evil people in "The Most Dangerous Game" and "Bargain" because they were both very sneaky and smart about murdering, they both stacked the deck against their victims, and they were both murderers.
The sentencing of underage criminals has remained a logistical and moral issue in the world for a very long time. The issue is brought to our perspective in the documentary Making a Murderer and the audio podcast Serial. When trying to overcome this issue, we ask ourselves, “When should juveniles receive life sentences?” or “Should young inmates be housed with adults?” or “Was the Supreme Court right to make it illegal to sentence a minor to death?”. There are multiple answers to these questions, and it’s necessary to either take a moral or logical approach to the problem.
The classic gangster film focusing on a host of norms defined by some of the first gangster films. This genre originated as an escapism from the negative depression era. People would flock to see the gangsters go from rags to riches with their glitzy lifestyle and beautiful women. As Shadoian puts it, “The gangster’s fizzy spirits, classy lifestyle, and amoral daring were something like Alka-Seltzer for the headaches of the depression” (Shadoin 29). Not all this came easily for the gangsters though, bloodshed is defined as a part of business with guns a constant motif. Despite these negative outcomes, it’s easy to see how this genre was such a great elusion from the everyday where the American Dream seemed like it might not even exist anymore.
The “Man I Killed” takes us into the Vietnam War and tell us about a soldiers first time of killing another individual. The author describes a Viet Cong soldier that he has killed, using vivid, physical detail with clear descriptions of the dead mans’ fatal wounds. O'Brien envisions the biography of this man and envisions the individual history of the dead Vietnamese soldier starting with his birthplace moving through his life, and finished with him enrolling in the Vietnamese Army. O'Brien also describes some of the dead soldiers’ hopes and dreams. The author uses this history in an attempt to make the dead man more realistic to the reader
The purpose of this essay is to critically evaluate Jeff McMahan’s methods of analyzing death. In his book, ‘The Ethics of Killing,’ McMahan formulates a method for determining the ‘badness’ of a death, something our society lacks. We have an intuitive way of considering different deaths; we consider a child dying by accident worse than a criminal being executed, for example. But there are more complicated cases, and we cannot always rely on our intuition. We must have a method for determining the badness of different deaths, and McMahan gives us an option. In the essay I will be explaining his method, and then pointing out a flaw, finally suggesting a compromise between the two.
One thing about violence that I learned from Peter van Uhm, Anwar Congo and his friends is that in war, you never get over the things you do or see. Anwar Congo was part of a death squad that tortured and executed Chinese people who were thought to be communists. In the video that we watched Anwar talks about the methods that he and his friends would use to kill people, and you can see that Anwar is trying to forget about what he did to those people. One thing that Peter van Uhm taught me is that when he is telling the story about his fathere being a soldier and trying to shoot down Nazi’s but not being able to because he was given a bad gun, and he was so upset about it that when he died, he still had not gotten over it. So in conclusion one
The story of “Killings” by Andre Dubus looked into the themes of crime, revenge and morality. The crime committed in the story depicted the father’s love for his son and the desire to avenge his son’s death. However, his own crime led to his own destruction as he was faced with questions of morality. The character found himself in a difficult position after taking his revenge. He failed to anticipate the guilt associated with the crime he committed. Feelings of anger and righteousness are illustrated by the character throughout the story.
In the Time article, “The Death of the Death Penalty”, David Von Drehle addresses the controversial issue of the death penalty. The death penalty in the United States is a declining and flawed method of punishment. The problem of the American death penalty is still an issue in this day and age. Von Drehle compresses the flaws of the death penalty into five simple reasons.
The death penalty or also known as capital punishment has been around for thousands of years, yet in today 's society, it is not very common to hear that a prisoner has been executed. There are hundreds of people that have been sentenced for death, but how many have actually had their sentence carried out? There are people who have been on death row for ten, twenty, and even thirty plus years still waiting for their execution. Which leads to the question of, how effective is capital punishment if prisoners are waiting for decades before procedure are even carried out. In his piece The Death of the Death Penalty, David Von Drehle talks about the possible end of capital punishment due to
Is murder ever truly justified? Many people might proclaim the adage, "Two wrongs don't make a right,” while others would argue that the Old Testament Bible states, "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" (Deuteronomy 19:21). Andre Dubus explores this moral dilemma in his short story, Killings. The protagonist, Matt Fowler, a good father and husband, decides to take revenge for his son's murder. Richard Strout is a bad man who murders his soon-to-be ex-wife's lover. These facts are complicated by the complexity of interpersonal relationships when seen through the lens of Matt’s conviction, Strout’s humanity, and ultimately Matt’s personal sacrifice on behalf of his loved ones. Though on the surface this tale might lead someone to think that Dubus is advocating for revenge, a closer look reveals that this a cautionary tale about the true cost of killing another human as readers are shown how completely Matt is altered by taking a life.
The Death Penalty should be discontinued to the families, human rights, and statistics. The families of the victim and the family of the one, who committed the crime, have no closure at all. The death penalty is killing a human for being convicted of a terrible crime one family may think its right but both suffer by their lost ones. “Although true closure is never really possible for the families, studies have shown that the continual process, along with the returning to court for many years, force families to confront the gruesome details of the crime many times over, making it impossible to get on with their lives. As difficult as that is the question is weather the victims needs are met effectively by killing someone else and causing another family grief and pain as well as adding to the cycle of violence.” (Progress) As both families do not want to see each other because they all have pain and hate for one another. They both relive the last memories of their loved one and they can’t help but cry and stare at the pictures they were once happy in. The families both have sadness when its their loved ones birthday. If the victim is married or have kids, their kids suffer and the husband/wife suffer as well. Although the families will never get there loved one back they still suffer on what had happen. Both families blame one another for having to take flowers, to their dead family member or visit their family member in a cemetery because of what happen. None of them is truly happy that they lost a family member. The families miss the person who seemed so happy, and also know that they are in a better place watching over them. Although the families aren’t happy about losing them, but are relieved to know that nothing else can hurt them. As one family feels sorry for the other family, there could be the family that doesn’t care what happens but wants everyone to suffer the way they are suffering about the tragic death of one family member.
The question of moral validity has plagued societies for millennia. Unsurprisingly, this question afflicted Indonesia between 1965 and 1966. In the early days of October 1965, a group of conspirators took and killed six generals. The disagreement of whom caused this coup caused the killing of more than 80,000 (1,000,000 in some areas) people. This caused a social change from aristocrats to an Indonesian business class. For other peoples around the world, the view of this genocide was a victory over communism. While these killings were clearly morally deplorable, the result was an improved and restructured government; a victory for capitalism at the height of the Cold War.
Michael Sanders, a Professor at Harvard University, gave a lecture titled “Justice: What’s The Right Thing To Do? The Moral Side of Murder” to nearly a thousand student’s in attendance. The lecture touched on two contrasting philosophies of morality. The first philosophy of morality discussed in the lecture is called Consequentialism. This is the view that "the consequences of one 's conduct are the ultimate basis for any judgment about the rightness or wrongness of that conduct.” (Consequentialism) This type of moral thinking became known as utilitarianism and was formulated by Jeremy Bentham who basically argues that the most moral thing to do is to bring the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest number of people possible.