Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of war on soldiers emotionally
The things they carried by tim o'brien free essay on the discussing the elements of the story that involved the central issues
The things they carried by tim o'brien free essay on the discussing the elements of the story that involved the central issues
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
What is a story? A story to me can be either a combination of characters and actions which can be fake or real. More like an adventure story used more for entertainment. Another example can be historical events a serious of events in the past which can be used for future learning. There are many different interpretations for a story. Many ways of telling a story also, for example the usual way of tell a scary story. Being in total darkness with a group of friends around each other and having one flash light for the story teller. It just makes the story a little spookier. Every story has its own unique way of telling it right. How would you tell a true war story? Well Tim O’Brien writes an example of how to tell a true war story, but he writes …show more content…
Many times in order to make the story seem right there has to be something filled in with a little lie or two. For example in O’Brien’s story rat is the one who writes to the friends’ sister but there was also some other guys who say what happened. One of the other guys tells his version of how the guy died, but he explained more what happened before the death and after. He explains how Rat and his buddy named Curt Lemon where enjoying time together playing with some smoke grenades and how one of them loses their life was pretty descriptive to us. Just that when he describes how Curt’s’ death occurs is a little hard to believe. The reason why I say that is because he describes the guy’s death in a more like romanticized moment for him. He be describes how it was a terrible moment but seamed very different in his words “when he died it was almost beautiful” He was saying how they were in the darkness and Curt stepping on a mine which made him lifted in the air seamed beautiful when the sunlight hit him at the moment of his death. At that moment he basically glorified the way Lemon died. Since he claims he saw the whole thing the part where he describes Lemons death is very skeptical. For me I think he made it up because it’s hard to believe you would see a death in that …show more content…
Many of veterans i've met personally have a different way of living because of what they have experienced and are hard for them to live many horrible memories they have gone through. At first when I didn’t know better and I would meet someone that has served war I would ask them about their experience there. Until one time when I was a little older one of the veterans I met told me that for them the veterans, they will never really tell you what exactly happened because for us the civilized people that haven’t experienced harsh moments. Would be too much to handle and is why they try to avoid telling us those moments even though for them is hard to not think of them. But not long ago I met a guy in school he had just come from Iraq this guy was very much affected by the time he served in war. You couldn’t walk up to him without calling him from his name with some distance from him because he would get startled and try to hurt you because of one incident he went through in war. He would tell us these crazy stories these I did believe where true war stories he didn’t hold anything back we would all sit in class listening to him tell his stories to the professor which also was fascinated and also a little to curious. Well since we were in a class room full of grown men already and the professor himself seamed crazy well was actually he actually felt like telling the story how it was. I don’t really remember the story how it
...r because it seems impossible to reconstruct an event from this objective point of view. Maybe the point of telling stories is not trying to recreate the reality of a past event, but it is the message that matters because that might be in the end the only thing that does not necessarily depend on single details of the story, but on the overall picture of an event. That is why to O’Brien another important component of a war story is the fact that a war story will never pin down the definite truth and that is why a true war story “never seems to end” (O’Brien, 425). O’Brien moves the reader from the short and simple statement “This is the truth” to the conclusion that, “In war you lose your sense of the definite, hence your sense of truth itself and therefore it’s safe to say that in a true war story nohting much is ever very true” (O’Brien, 428). These two statements frame the entire irony of the story, from its beginning to its end. Almost like the popular saying “A wise man admits that he knows nothing.”
The reality that shapes individuals as they fight in war can lead to the resentment they have with the world and the tragedies that they had experienced in the past. Veterans are often times overwhelmed with their fears and sensations of their past that commonly disables them to transgress and live beyond the emotions and apprehensions they witness in posttraumatic experiences. This is also seen in everyday lives of people as they too experience traumatic events such as September 11th and the fall of the World Trade Center or simply by regrets of decisions that is made. Ones fears, emotions and disturbances that are embraced through the past are the only result of the unconscious reality of ones future.
The role of storytelling is significant since it highlights the personalities and traits specific to important characters. Storytelling can also drive the plot, as seen in Homer’s The Odyssey and Virgil’s The Aeneid. These epics are based on the telling of the protagonist’s journey. However Grendel, written by John Gardner, utilizes storytelling in a different manner. The main character bases his self-understanding off of the storytelling done by the Shaper, a blind bard telling historical tales. The purpose of storytelling in Gardner’s, Homer’s and Virgil’s works is to personify the protagonist in what he does to truly define himself.
The truth to any war does not lie in the depths of storytelling but rather it’s embedded in every person involved. According to O’Brien, “A true war story does not depend on that kind of truth. Absolute occurrence is irrelevant. A thing may happen and be a total lie; another thing may not happen and be truer than the truth” (pg. 80). Truths of any war story in my own opinion cannot be fully conveyed or explained through the use of words. Any and all war stories provide specific or certain facts about war but each of them do not and cannot allow the audience to fully grasp the tru...
Tim O’Brien is doing the best he can to stay true to the story for his fellow soldiers. Tim O’Brien believed that by writing the story of soldiers in war as he saw it brings some type of justice to soldiers in a war situation.
Life is a series of questions that people strive to answer through desperate endeavors to put some value and meaning behind their existence and purpose. However, it has been a mystery as to how to achieve those answers. A popular misleading belief is that the answers to life’s questions begin from answering the biggest question of them all “Who am I?” To discover the answer to this and all other questions, people use the assistance of others around them. Interacting and forming relationships with others allows one to not only to get to know those people, but also discover him/herself in that process. Writer Robert Thurman would agree with the notion of the crucial necessity of humans to be interconnected with their community and environment, conversely he would disagree with the concept of defining and labeling the self to just be one determined identity, and he defends this argument in his text “Wisdom.” Similarly, in war veteran and author Tim O’Brien’s narration “How to Tell a True War Story” he illustrates the imperative role that the bond he shared with fellow soldiers played during the Vietnam War and in discovering new things about each other’s personality. However, writer Jon Krakauer takes readers on an expedition to follow the journey of Christopher McCandless in the Alaskan wilderness in his narrative selections from Into the Wild, trying to define McCandless’ identity and believes that isolation from society may lead to the discovery of the self. All three authors delve into the importance that the self and interconnectedness, hold in life. Although they discuss similar concepts, not all three authors have the same viewpoints about the notions. Thurman and O’Brien share similar positions about the self and interconnect...
O’Brien, Tim. “How to Tell a True War Story.” The Things They Carried. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1990. Print.
Sometimes a person needs to make up their own truth to survive a crisis situation, so long as the person does not reject other philosophies as Grendel does. This is often the case in war, when a person must distance themselves from the violence, the cruelty, the sheer disgust of the fighting. In The Things They Carried, Tim O’Brien writes that he tells war stories that are not “happening truth,” but rather a “story truth” that feels more genuine. In other words, often the depiction of a single, real event cannot convey everything that a person feels. According to O’Brien, a story can reveal much more by emphasizing or recreating everything that conveys the essence of the truth into a
O’Brien gives the reader an example of a true war story when he tells of the soldier that jumped on a grenade to save his friends however the grenade took all their lives away. On page 61, O'Brien states that this is a true war story that never happened. This is a true war story because it fits his criteria about how a war story should be but the story never actually happens. This is a true war story because it is sad because shows loss despite the soldier’s effort to save his
In the postmodernist view of the nature of truth, the definition of truth is inconclusive. Due to the lack of belief of a true reality, story truth may more accurately portray the truth than the happening truth. Since personal interpretation distorts the truth, the portrayal of emotions felt in a specific situation is more truthful than what was seen to have actually happened. In The Things They Carried, Tim O'Brien gives a rationale for his reason for telling a made up story by stating, “I want you to feel what I felt. I want you to know why story-truth is truer sometimes than happening-truth.” In the art of storytelling, the factual truth is not as important as the emotional truth. Emotions are capable of more accurately depicting the truth to a situation than what actually happened. Since one person’s truth to a situation can differ from that of someone else, the portrayal of the emotions that one felt during that time are better able to tell the truth of the situation for each individual. In The Things They Carried, Tim O’Brien reflects on the art to storytelling:
The truth is important because it is factual and can be proven, but for Tim O'brien nobody can actually tell a true war story won’t always be true because the normal stuff seems true and actually the crazy things that occur are usually the
Talking about their heroic or gruesome adventures at war is a sensitive subject to most war veterans. Although some soldiers come home struggling to talk about their traumatic experience overseas, some are more open about the subject because they are grateful to have survived the war. I am thankful to have a war veteran in my life who does not struggle to talk about their experience and who came back to the states as a proud veteran. I had the wonderful opportunity to interview my grandfather who is a proud survivor of the Vietnam war.
One of the later entries in the book called “Good form”, helps alleviate the suspicion of dishonesty in the stories by bluntly telling the reader that all the other entries are a mix of both fact and fiction. O’Brien feels the need to make up parts of his stories due to the fact that he wants the reader to experience emotions as opposed to mental visuals. He describes these emotion-laden scenes as “story-truth” due to the fact that they are part story and part truth. The parts that are only for emotio...
In much of The Things They Carried, stories are retold time and time again. One reason for this is the idea of keeping a story’s story-truth alive. In “Good Form,” O’Brien differentiates what he calls story-truth from happening-truth. Story-truth seems to give us a better understanding of O’Brien’s sentiment in a particular story even though the story itself may not be true at all. On the other hand, happening-truth is what actually happened in the story, but may not contain as much emotional authenticity as story-truth. According to O’Brien, story-truth is therefore truer than happening-truth. Relating back to storytelling, O’Brien retells stories continuously to maintain their sentiment and emotional value. Without this continuous repetition, this sentiment fades away and the emotional value of the story is lost.
A story or experience can be told in many different versions, truthfully or not and they’re all equally valid, each carrying its own equal resonating affect. This occurs in the four versions of Curt Lemon’s death; the narrator makes the puzzling statement, “this is true” but continues to provide us with four different occurrences of what “really” happened (O’Brien 65). One of them describes his death as “almost beautiful”, another as “horrible” and we’re never given the actual truth, in fact, the reader questions if there even is one truthful story ...