Tax Increment Case Study

2986 Words6 Pages

Q1. What are the four techniques of financing redevelopment in local areas? Briefly explain the tax increment financing technique? Has this technique been abused by business communities? Explain. \
After World War II the cost of redevelopment was mostly paid by taxpayers through property taxes. Then as the housing market increased, tax payers became increasingly weary of the growing costs. These costs were attributed to the increasing budgets from municipalities and school districts. Thus, Proposition 13 was enacted by limiting “the basic property tax to 1 percent of the property’s assessed value” (180, Cullingworth). Now, cities can no longer rely solely on tax payers to cover costs. In turn, municipalities have increased charger, and state and federal funding has begun to diminish (180, Cullingworth). The purpose of this paper will be to give four alternative sources of funding for redevelopment at the local level, and to discuss the tax increment financing technique and whether the technique has been abused by the …show more content…

The criteria are similar in most cities, states, and are long-term with a dollar cost of at least $10,000. Moreover, all projects to be considered must be drawn up and include, but not limited to, “the name of the project, the location and description of the project, the justification of the project, the schedule of funds to be expended, the source of the funding, and the annual operating budget impact of the project’ (188, Cullingworth). Not all projects that are submitted by the city get accepted, so each project is valued by all pertinent information depicted in the CIP. Each CIP is then reviewed by a community, which can include both citizens of the community and department representatives. Once the CIP’s have been selected, they are the herd by some form of planning commission who will submit a recommendation to the ‘mayor and city council’ for a final

More about Tax Increment Case Study

Open Document