Taming Of The Shrew Movie Vs Play

1557 Words4 Pages

In Shakespeare’s Taming of the Shrew, it is very arguable to say that it could either be an anti-romantic play or a romantic play. In my interpretation of this play, I think that it could be construed as a very unromantic and misogynistic play, with nothing based off love and only money and pettiness. Shakespeare proves this countless amount of times in this play by displaying Petruccio and Lutencio’s points of views towards the women that they marry. This play was upmost very unromantic and this paper gives light to how these men mistreated women throughout this theatrical production. Katherina is a perfect character that displays how unromantic this play is, Katherina is a very troubled person in this play, she is as they call the “shrew”. …show more content…

In the scheme of things women are still told to shut their mouths and hold back their opinion’s so they do not come off as annoying or unattractive. A perfect example of this would be the movie adaptation of this play, 10 Things I Hate About You. In this movie, you have the same characters like Katherina and Bianca except in a high school setting. Katherina is still seen as a shrew for not holding back her tongue and she is penalized for it. Unlike this play, 10 Things I Hate About You is romantic and these characters’ result in loving relationships instead of the alternative, of how the Taming of The Shrews relationships are based off money. Furthermore; multiple times throughout this play, language is used to show that women are inferior to men. In the final scene of the play Petruccio and Lurencio finally win Kate and Bianca over but it takes “taming" and money to get them; nevertheless, very unromantic. These marriages in this play lack all senses of finding love, Lurencio is simply infatuated with Bianca and even makes a bet on her to see who can have her, he also seems to be more interested because of her dowry. Since women had to be tamed and paid for, this reveals that women were like objects to these men, that are bought and not …show more content…

It doesn’t stop there either; these marriages are based purely off convenience. At the end of the day Katherine is supposed to marry a man so she is taken care of, there was no love there. The only character in this play that at least had a semi romantic marriage was Bianca and that was based off the fact she was quiet and beautiful, which is very superficial. This has nothing to do with love or romance. Not only this, the only reason Katherina was getting married in the first place was purely for the fact that she had to so Bianca could get married. Furthermore, she was tricked because Petruchio didn’t want to marry her at all, it was all about convenience for Bianca. The two relationships in this play that were supposed to be romanticized, are awfully sorrowful in many ways Moreover, Petruchio only has a financial interest in women in general, which is shown many times during this play. Petruchio makes his objectives obvious when he asks Hortensio if he knows of a suitable bachelorette with a rich dowry: “If thou know / One rich enough to be Petruchio’s wife, / As wealth is burden of my wooing dance… / I come to wive it wealthily in Padua; / If wealthily, then happily in Padua.” (1,2.). For Petruchio, it is all about the dowry he is about to inherit, further proving that this play is upmost

Open Document