This website is about Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and it's very easy to use because it gives a lot of information about the disease. Yes the information is relevant because it asks what Lupus is, who can get it, what causes it, and the symptoms of it. Yes it is very easy to understand because of they way it was typed. The source is very reliable, I can tell by the information that was put and it's a government website.
This website was not easy to use because of the simple fact that it didn't have enough information on it. No there was no relevant information on there because I had to click on other parts of the page to get to the information I was looking for. Once I clicked on the other part of the page it was pretty easy to understand but other than that no. Yes it is from a reliable
…show more content…
From what I can tell the information is extremlly relevant about this situation. Yes the it was easy to understand and very helpful to those that may need it. Yes the source is reliable not only because it's from an organization that is affiliated with University of Florida but it gives great information.
This website was easy to understand because it told about the different triggers of seizures, the diagnosis, the different types, and much more. Yes it presents relevant information because it tells a lot about epilepsy. Yes it was very easy to understand and I believe it was because if a person who is epileptic needs information finds this site it would be great. I would think it is from a reliable source even though the website has ,com and not ,org or something to that extent.
This website can be easy to use but you really have to play around with it. Yes it gives great relevant information because the heart is a major factor in the body system. No this website was not easy to understand because of the fact that most information was hard to find. Yes it is from an reliable
I think that this source is reliable because it is from a website that has been created by the government intended to inform the general public about the use of drugs, and therefore it is unlikely to give out false information.
No, the authors seems to be true to their words. They each have credible backgrounds.
This source gave me tons of information about the actual case and the well being it gave me more of a understanding about the case and what she was going through and what happened and the steps of the case so this was a valuable source
Site & Access: The site Hreonline.com is very easy to use, reliable, and credible so it receives a 10 out of 10.
...th cancer are.It talks about how confusing it is for them, even more so than it is for a normal teen most of the time. The words come straight from a book, making it a little more reliable than most .com websites. So for the most part it is a reliable source.
Point #1: “Lupus is a chronic (6 wks. -Years), autoimmune disease that occurs when your body’s immune system damages any part of your body such as the skin, joints, and organs.”
...atch all” for a ton of different ailments that leads to cardiac dysrhythmia. I honestly had no clue that there were so many “levels” to this disease and am happy I got to educate myself further. Heart problems and high blood pressure is such a huge issue in my family and when you know more, you do more to help prevent this issue from becoming something more serious than it needs to be. The resources weren’t as hard to find once I understood that there were different names and types of heart issues that fell under this one subject.
-I believe it is very reliable. I compared it to what was said in our text and it stood up very well, granted this site goes more in depth upon this subject than our text. But it still manages to speak about the Emperor Penguin which are book informs us on.
Both websites are successful in keeping your interest; however a simple layout does the better job in the long run. It may not be the most “pretty” article, but the quality of information is superior. I believe the best choice is the source with more credibility and expertise. In this case that would be the information provided by Dr. McLeod.
Later, the doctors told me I had epilepsy, specifically the type known as grand mal. Immediately, the doctors put me on some medications to prevent the seizures. They also gave my parents a bunch of packets of information about epilepsy. When I got older, some of those packets informed me that 20-25 million people have suffered from an epileptic seizure. Many people grow out of childhood epilepsy or they take medicine to control it. However, there is still a risk of having a seizure even if you take medication. Over the past few years, I have become increasingly aware of the chance of a seizure at any time.
Are assertions in the source based on reliable evidence? Are sources cited? How are you able to tell? They do list where they get their info from within the paragraphs or quotes.
The student chose to evaluate the content of CDC.gov for credibility. The literature identifies five criteria that users should employ in their assessments of the credibility of Internet-based information: accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, and coverage (Metzger, 2010). For the purpose of this assignment, the approach to provide analysis of this Web-based source will be to use these five criteria: authority, information, objectivity, ease of navigation and privacy and security policies.
In addition, this articles overall effectiveness was not what I was expecting. The article was overwhelming because of all the people she mentioned and then she tried elaborating what they all said after each interview! “For my most recent bo...
This source is reliable because it is a published piece of work, which was displayed in a highly regarded and respected newspaper. It is a newspaper that is well known around the world. This source has no bias opinions and is only factual
seems to be the best source for real time citizen news on the Mumbai terrorist attacks,