Sustainability Initiative Summary

695 Words2 Pages

In Emory University’s Office of Sustainability Initiative Report, Emory outlines the strategic plan for creating sustainable living on campus. For Emory University sustainable living is defined as environmental systems, economic and culture provide a healthy and “meaningful” life. While the report demonstrates improvement in sustainable thinking at collegiate institutions, its flaws represent a stepping-stone to creating better resilience and sustainable thinking. Such flaws being the ambiguity with which the plan was created and lack of resilient thought, however, it does provide a valuable baseline for which to evaluate the current and needed progress in turning Emory University into a institution that is both resilient and sustainable. …show more content…

The strategic report plans on building upon the first report made in 2004 along with the progress made with programs such as the University Senate Committee on the Environment, Emory Recycles, the No Net Loss of Forest police, the commitment to LEED construction and the campus land use classification plan (2015). After highlighting the progress made, the report states that the goal is to continue progress growth within the next ten years with an audit occurring after five years. The report goes on to define sustainability as, “a community is sustainable if economic, social, and environmental systems provide a healthy, productive, and meaningful life for all community residents, present and future”(2015). The definition of sustainability is then built upon to identify four strategic action areas where progress will be made. The action areas being support of culture to act on sustainability, expanding the network of sustainability “champions”, using Emory landscape to model sustainability, and to create resilient and flourishing communities with strategic partnerships. The report then identifies action points and guiding questions per each …show more content…

The lack of resilient thought throughout the strategic plan demonstrates Emory’s lack of understanding. While sustainability is defined within the second page, resilience and the importance of resilience is never mentioned. The report mainly focuses upon ‘winning’ and becoming ‘champions’ of sustainability. Using this terminology shows Emory’s committed to demonstrating the improvements made rather than the mistakes that have been made. Which is why the report lacks detail, instead of creating clear and concise plans for the next few years and potentially being unable to meet such plans Emory decides to structurally create a vague strategic

Open Document