Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Argument on genetically modified food
Effects of gmo foods on human health
Argument on genetically modified food
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Argument on genetically modified food
The term GMO (Genetically Modified Organisms) is a generally feared acronym. Many people in the United States are repulsed by the process of creating GMOs, while some argue that GMOs can be used for agricultural advancements such as drought issues or nutritional deficiency. In an article entitled “We’re Having the Wrong Argument About GMOs” by Caitlin Dewey, she attempts to make her voice heard in the widely controversial argument about GMOs. In this article, she interviews McKay Jenkins, a journalist that has spent many years researching GMOs. Her article was published in The Washington Post; which many consider to be a pro-left, or liberal newspaper and website. The audience she is hoping to reach in this article is the average …show more content…
Dewey makes very strong and factual claims to persuade the reader to consider their misconceptions about GMOs. Prior to reading this article, I did not think GMOs were anything to concern myself with. After reading and thinking about Dewey’s article, I have come to believe that GMOs are something that should be researched and developed further into a sustainable process that benefits everyone globally. GMOs have the potential to maintain and develop higher sustainability for crops, healthier foods, and decrease world hunger. The GMO process provides a quick and easy way to produce crops. Caitlin Dewey makes the point that GMO technology is enabling industrialized farming to not only expand, but grow crops very quickly. Some argue that this puts many small farmers out of business and they would be correct. In choosing any career, if you’re not meeting the demands of your employer then almost always you will be replaced. This seems to be a bit harsh, but it is what humanity must do in order to become more …show more content…
These foods consist primarily of corn and soybeans. “The corn is processed into high-fructose corn syrup, which goes into sodas; the corn and soybeans go into feeding the animals that become fast-food hamburgers or chicken nuggets.” (Dewey Para. 17) While she is correct, she does not speculate how we could instead generate highly nutritious foods with the use of GMOs. I believe that with more support and research, nutritious foods would ameliorate the obesity problem in this nation, thus resulting in a healthier population of both adults and
"The Good, Bad and Ugly about GMOs." Natural Revolution. Natural Revolution , n.d. Web. 16 May 2014. .
Considering an argument as valid requires critical analysis of several aspects and providing strong evidence. Robin Mather, a journalist who “has passion for food and its sources, has worked at major metropolitan newspapers (the Detroit News, the Chicago Tribune)”(86), argues that GMOs have risks and hazards to human health and threats to wildlife and environment in her article “The Threats from Genetically Modified Foods”, whereas Entine, a colleague at the Genetic Literacy Project, and Wendel, a science writer(82), claim that GMOs are safe to eat and no harm to people or animals in their article “2000+Reasons Why GMOs are Safe to Eat and Environmentally Sustainable” Both articles’ authors state their ideas clearly for whether GMOs could be eaten or not. However, Mather provides more solid
Susan Jacoby’s essay titled Common Decency is her critical response to Camille Paglia’s Sexual Personae and anti-feminists that follow the same views as Paglia. Jacoby’s beginnings started as a newspaper reporter, leading to multiple published essays, biographies and non-fiction literature. Common Decency was published in the New York Times in April 1991(Nadell, Langan, and Comodromos 571), where Jacoby states “date rapes do not happen because a man honestly mistakes a woman’s “no” for “yes”…They occur because a minority of men…can’t stand to take “no” for an answer” (Jacoby 572) as her thesis statement.
To begin with, there is too much Gmo in our food. We should make less foods with GMO and grow more foods on farms. Also a lot of people prefer non GMO foods over GMO foods. If we also make more of our food on farms we can get more people to get jobs. “ GM critics also worry that transgenic crops could harm wildlife and cause lasting damage to fragile food chains. GM crops harm wildlife. Since some birds and small mammals feed on these crops they will soon disappear. They will disappear because they are making the crops
In a feeble attempt to cure world hunger scientists developed GMOs, or 'genetically-modified organisms', which are genetically enhanced crop plants created for human consumption, and although GMOs were initially designed to benefit the world, it appears as though they are doing as much harm as they are good. Originally, GMOs were designed to c...
In this day and age, Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) have become a topic of large interest in the media. GMOs are defined as an organism whose genetic structure has been altered by incorporating a gene that will express a desirable trait (Dresbach et al. al. 2013). Often times, these traits that are selected are either beneficial to the consumer or producer. Currently, GMOs are being created at a higher rate than ever before and are being used in the foods that we eat.
In the article, “ Hillary Clinton’s concession speech for the 2016 presidential speech election,” published by Katie Reilly, she interviews and reports Tim Kaine’s opinion about Clinton’s speech, is being delivered in the convention center of New York City. In regards to Hillary Clinton’s defeat in the presidential election, her supporters were in awe about the outcome in her presidential campaign loss. In which apparently Reilly, intends to persuade by her use of informative language, and interviewing a republican, which maintains a very empowering feminist perspective. Its main purpose of Reilly’s article is to inform and persuade by the diction that is being used in one of Clinton’s political campaigns.
How many of you hear the words “genetically modified food” and immediately think “BAD”? How many of you scorn the idea that genetically modified foods are useful? How many of you have been manipulated by the media to think that all biotechnology is evil? Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are organisms that have been genetically spliced to achieve a certain trait. As the demand for a larger food supply is increasing due to population growth, the benefits that GMO foods provide are being hailed as the only solution to the food crisis. However, many people are making inadequately informed decisions, and are pushing them to the back shelf. I will inform you on why genetically modified organisms may be the only way to a stable, safe future for the less fortunate.
This report explains genetically modified food (GMOs) and discusses the benefits and risks associated with the consumptions of GMOs. Genetically modified foods (GMOs) are foods that have been genetically altered using engineering techniques. The most common technique used today is called recombinant DNA technology; this technology combines different molecules from different plant species to create a plant with a new set of genes, a hybrid plant. Another recombinant DNA technology being used is recombinant bovine somatotropin (rBST) an artificial growth hormone; this hormone is being fed or injected into cows to improve milk production. (ThefreeDictionary)
GM seeds are considered revolution in the agriculture industry for some reasons. First and foremost, GM seeds can grow crops regardless of hostile conditions, which help farmers increase revenues. Besides, as a result of population growth across the global, the demand for food continuously increases. Biotech products provided by the Monsanto Company will be the best solution for this phenomenon. Especially in populous countries like India, biotech crops allow farmers both save lands and double their harvest.
Genetically modified food’s, or GMOs, goal is to feed the world's malnourished and undernourished population. Exploring the positive side to GMOs paints a wondrous picture for our planet’s future, although careful steps must be taken to ensure that destruction of our ecosystems do not occur. When GMOs were first introduced into the consumer market they claimed that they would help eliminate the world’s food crisis by providing plants that produced more and were resistant to elemental impacts like droughts and bacterial contaminants, however, production isn’t the only cause for the world’s food crisis. Which is a cause for concern because the population on the earth is growing and our land and ways of agriculture will not be enough to feed everyone sufficiently. No simple solutions can be found or applied when there are so many lives involved. Those who are hungry and those who are over fed, alike, have to consider the consequences of Genetically Modified Organisms. Food should not be treated like a commodity it is a human necessity on the most basic of levels. When egos, hidden agendas, and personal gains are folded into people's food sources no one wins. As in many things of life, there is no true right way or wrong way to handle either of the arguments and so many factors are involved that a ‘simple’ solution is simply not an option.
She identifies with them as “we” and discusses the differences between this world and that of our mothers and grandmothers. By only speaking to one gender in her speech, she possibly isolates the influence she could have on men, but on the other hand, it makes her much more appealing to listen to as a woman. The seats in the auditorium are filled with women, which gives her ethos in this situation because she stands out as successful among other women. The larger context here is the entire internet and anyone interested in watching her speech online, but when she gives her speech, she focuses on her immediate audience, not the broader one. But while she does not consider the internet as her audience, it definitely broadens her audience, particularly to men.
GM crops also benefit the economy and assist in feeding more people. While we struggle with feeding our population, “The population will continue to grow” (Calandrelli 1) For instance, genetic engineering in agriculture can minimize the cost of producing food. Thus, GMO’s in crops can result ...
The TED talk about the genetically modified food really stuck me. The TED talk was about all the modifications being made to crop to protect them from disease and other problems. I believe this would be relating to agriculture and scientific engineering. The speaker mention that people have a preconceived idea that GMOs are bad for you, but she went on to explain all the good they have done. For example, saved all of Hawaii’s papayas because they engineered the papayas to be resistant to the disease. She also talked about how they’ve created ‘golden rice’ that is rich is vitamin A and could stop children in third world countries from dying, if they had one bowl a day. She said that GMOs are good for our planet and that they have seen no negative
Genetically Modified Foods: The Answer to World Hunger. Genetically modified (GM) foods have become omnipresent over the past decade. They are a technological breakthrough that allows humans to manipulate and add foreign genes to crops to enhance desired traits, but they have also evolved into a controversial issue, especially for Third World countries. Some people believe that GM foods not only provide larger yields to feed hungry citizens in Third World countries, but they can also be a source of great nutritional value.