Summary Of The Achievement Of Desire By Richard Rodriguez

1446 Words3 Pages

I believe the art of the conclusion is in summarizing and generalizing experiences or information in order to affect the reader, and strongly closing out a piece of writing. Moreover, an author must strive to utilize universal situations, thus increasing the reader’s ability to relate to and comprehend the meaning of an essay. Three writers from Ways of Reading, Paulo Freire, Richard Rodriguez, and Alberto Alvaro Rios, write conclusions that are mostly effective in making an impact on the reader. They all write about the way education currently functions, and their conclusions address reformation of modern teaching and learning. The way these essays differ correlates with how the writer addresses the problem and how he suggests, or does not …show more content…

Being a “scholarship boy” is not something to be proud about, claims Richard Hoggart, thus it is inevitable that Rodriguez tries throughout the essay to make a generalization of the way he has learned. Nevertheless, the “scholarship boy” is too specific a state-of-mind and situation for Rodriguez’s story to be universal. It is not easy for many readers to understand how Rodriguez felt “moving away from a life of closeness and immediacy...with his parents, growing older” (Rodriguez 550), as the experience is not overly common. Rodriguez’s essay, shown in his conclusion, can only suggest that, as students experience education, they should reflect on how their school and home life are interconnected, so “the end of education” (Rodriguez 550) is not a result of an epiphany or full of regret. Moreover, Rodriguez does not offer a concrete solution to being a “scholarship boy.” Instead, he dwells on what not to do as a student. In terms of the concluding paragraph, Rodriguez does a mediocre job in comparison to both Freire and Rios. Notably, Rodriguez’s story becomes impersonal due to the lack of dialogue between the reader and the writer, and it is too …show more content…

The phrases and specific words that Rios uses in his conclusion open the door for interpretation of language from the reader’s perspective. Specifically, when Rios speculates that “Maybe [the complexity of human interaction is] what keeps us human, and engaged, and necessary” (Rios 508), and this positively inspires original thought from the reader. Words, especially words like “maybe,” can be so powerful because they allow for agreement and disagreement, instead of proselytizing the reader. Rios uses this tactic effectively in his writing to motivate the reader to think deeply about the effect of such language on the real world. Additionally, Rios summarizes his essay in the conclusion by providing even more food for thought: “Language is more than what we say—it’s also how we say it, and whether or not we even understand what we are saying” (Rios 508), and this point actively involves the reader’s personal experiences with language by using “we” instead of something like “people” or “humans.” This method transforms his piece of writing into a more relatable and personal essay, and such words push all readers to think of times in their personal experience that language was used in such a

Open Document