The essay, “How a Financial Pro Lost His Finances,” was published by Carl Richards in 2011. It discussed the situation of the financial crisis in 2008 when the value of homes and mortgages dropped and how people lost their cash. The purpose of the article is to explain how people lost their fortunes during the financial crisis and the housing boom, some of whom were financial experts. The boom came unexpected and did not spare the investors in the real estate industry. The author highlights different cases of investors who lost their fortunes in the aftermath of the housing boom. Although the author is a financial expert, he also lost his resources like other investors who did not have financial and economic knowledge. The author is among those who lost their homes. He explains the mistakes that he learned from the loss and made him better in understanding the economic trends. …show more content…
However, the essay also has a specific audience of those working in the economic regulation sector. It appears that careless economic strategies had been adopted until no one saw the boom and the crisis coming. The author notes that his salary was rising rapidly, and he did not find it a big deal to buy a home worth half a million dollars. Almost everyone was looking for homes and houses because they were affordable. The author imagined that this was the only chance he had to buy a home. The population purchasing houses is also highlighted in the article, which included people in their early twenties. This is the reason the article has a general audience because it considers the interest of all people in the population. However, it is of significant use to economic
In “The Real Truth about Money” (2005), Gregg Easterbrook discusses the effects of money on the people’s happiness. He presents his article with statistics of the generation immediately after the World War II and the current generation. He has experienced both generations as he has lived in both and is very familiar with the difference of people’s lives now and back then. Easterbrook is a highly reputed journalist, he is an authorized writer, editor, and professor. He worked with many professional magazines and newspapers; accordingly, he has enough knowledge to write about the people’s happiness in terms of money. Easterbrook has well convinced the readers with psychological facts from university researches and credible
In the essay “The Mansion: A Subprime Parable,” Michael Lewis unfolds the real face of the American dream. He talks about his own personal experience in his look out for a house and his struggle with the house he rented. Most Americans have bought houses they cannot afford. Banks offered loans, they have lent mortgages that many don't have enough financial resources to pay them back. Agents have falsely guaranteed that real estate prices will be in constant rise, they promised them that there will be no declination in prices.
After a generation of portfolio managers and investors profiting from decades of favorable returns on stocks, they believed the modern economy was impervious to major calamities (“Rethinking” 20). As inflation rates fell from record highs in the late 1970s and early 1980s to the record lows that they are today, interest rates followed, enabling Americans to borrow more money from lenders which, in turn, increased housing prices to all-time highs (“Rethinking” 21).
In conclusion, we have determined that the housing crisis that the United States faces today is a huge problem. We have discussed the striking similarities between the Great Depression in the 1920s and 1930s and today's problem. And I have presented my solution to the problem and how I think it should be prevented in the future.
In “The Big Short”, this movie about the economic collapse of 2008 in America highlights how Americans of all racial backgrounds were hit hard when the housing market collapsed. The film provides a very compelling argument and describes how the market crashed because banks began to give out more unstable loans out to people in order to sell more properties, which eventually led to the housing market to be built upon millions of risky loans. This practice grew until the housing market became too unstable because of all the risky loans and resulted in an economic crash. The housing market collapse led to millions of Americans to lose their homes because of foreclosures and led to massive amount of homelessness and unemployment since the Great
The Millionaire Next Door written by William Danko and Thomas J. Stanley illustrates the misconception of high luxury spenders in wealthy neighborhoods are considered wealthy. This clarifies that American’s who drive expensive cars, and live in lavish homes are not millionaires and financially independent. The authors show the typical millionaire are one that is frugal, and disciplined. Their cars are used, and their suits were purchased at a discount. As we read the book from cover to cover are misconceptions start to fade. The typical millionaire is very frugal in all endeavors and finds the best discounts possible. A budget is implemented daily, monthly, and annually for a typical millionaire. They live by the budget and are goal oriented. Living well below their means is crucial for a millionaire, and discovering ways to allocate time and money more efficiently. The typical millionaire next door is different than the majority of America presumes. Let’s first off mention what it is not. The typical millionaire is surprisingly not the individual with the lavish house worth a million dollars, owning multiple expensive cars, a boat, expensive clothes, and ultimately living lavishly. The individual is frugal and often looks for discounts for consumable goods. The book illustrates the typical millionaire in one simple word: frugal. It is shocking to believe that this is true, but it does make sense. To achieve financial independence is inherently more satisfying and important than accumulating wealth. According to the book the majority of these millionaires portray characteristics of being sacrificial, disciplined, persistent and frugal. In the book it states, “Being frugal is the cornerstone of wealth-building. Yet far too often th...
situation in the United States and an unfold story about his family money stash , I can relate to
In the documents titled, William Graham Sumner on Social Darwinism and Andrew Carnegie Explains the Gospel of Wealth, Sumner and Carnegie both analyze their perspective on the idea on “social darwinism.” To begin with, both documents argue differently about wealth, poverty and their consequences. Sumner is a supporter of social darwinism. In the aspects of wealth and poverty he believes that the wealthy are those with more capital and rewards from nature, while the poor are “those who have inherited disease and depraved appetites, or have been brought up in vice and ignorance, or have themselves yielded to vice, extravagance, idleness, and imprudence” (Sumner, 36). The consequences of Sumner’s views on wealth and poverty is that they both contribute to the idea of inequality and how it is not likely for the poor to be of equal status with the wealthy. Furthermore, Carnegie views wealth and poverty as a reciprocative relation. He does not necessarily state that the wealthy and poor are equal, but he believes that the wealthy are the ones who “should use their wisdom, experiences, and wealth as stewards for the poor” (textbook, 489). Ultimately, the consequences of
Financial Shenanigans was written by Howard Schilit. The main objective of the book is to show ways companies can alter their financial accounting reports to reflect a much attractive appearance of their company’s health and growth when indeed that company is running into severe trouble. There are different ways the company can accomplish this and the author gives us “Seven Shenanigans” that companies can change the investor’s point of view towards the performance of the company. Basically, he breaks up each chapter to the particular shenanigan and discusses different techniques for achieving each shenanigan. For example, the author used Priceline.com, Cendant/CUC, AOL, and Xerox to illustrate each shenanigan. Chapter 11 and 12 of the book discusses the analyzing of financial reports and how to use financial databases to discover warning signs. Then there is another chapter on finding shenanigans in the company’s annual 10K report and how to find hints for financial shenanigans.
The book I chose to review for this course is titled, “The Millionaire Next Door”, by Thomas J. Stanley, Ph.D., and William D. Danko, Ph.D. After learning that it was published in 1996, prior to the widespread availability of the internet, and subsequent ebusiness boom, I was slightly sceptical that the information held within might not be relevant for someone like myself trying to thrive in today’s chaotic economy. Fortunately, I was wrong. The Millionaire Next Door is full of concepts and principles that put into perspective how we view money and status in our society, and also debunks the myth that America’s wealthy are the ones doing most of the spending while living elaborate and carefree lives. There are several ‘takeaway’ principles that are presented to the reader. I will be focusing on the five concepts and ideas that impacted me the most.
Summary of “The Money” by Junot Diaz In this essay, the author recounts a life event from his childhood. The story begins with Junot describing his family's financial status and living arrangement. Diaz and his four siblings lived with their two parents in a catchpenny apartment in a rough urban borough. Not steadily employed, his mother and father were in a constant struggle to keep the family afloat monetarily; to the point where decent, alimental food was not a likely sight in the household. Despite their meager inhabitance his mother was stowing $200 to $300 monthly and sending it to her parents in the Dominican Republic.
The housing boom created an illusion of ever increasing home equity. It was difficult to walk away from potential homes that seemed good on the surface, but in reality were either money pits or less than desirable. For the uninitiated, making sense out of the chaos when things start to go wrong is an emotional process that lends itself to the gradual disposal of the rose-colored glasses. The upkeep and maintenance that homeownership requires of the inexperienced homeowner, particularly an older home, is comparable to taking on a new entry-level job with diminishing returns. There is a prevailing chaos amid the turmoil of a broken water pipe during a holiday weekend.
Disappointment in financial risk management takes various structures, the greater part of which are exemplified in the present emergency. For instance, risk appraisals are regularly taking into account chronicled information, for example, changes in house costs after some time. Yet, fast financial advancement, including securitized subprime contracts, has made such information untrustworthy. Also, a few risks are missed on the grounds that they are covered up in excessively complex reports that leaders cannot get it (Stoian & Stoian, 2016).
Financialization is a complex process that labels global finance as the dominant force that drives all economic and political bearings. In order to understand this concept and the process of how financialization works, this essay will evaluate and assess how the collapse of the housing market led to the fiancial crisis in 2008. According to Economic Geography a contemporary introduction, financialization “is when all sorts of things are transformed into financial instruments for trading among individuals and firms in the international capital markets. Through financialization, fixed properties such as housing are financialized into structured investment vehicles such as mortgages—back securities that can be easily traded among global investors through a variety of financial institutions” (Coe, Kelly, and Yeung, 2013). Trading mortgages, or shares at the global level proved to be a financial disaster for many involved. Ultimately the collateralized debt obligation market collapsed and thus dragged down the entire global financial market.
Following the sudden increase of the dot-com bubble and the possibility of decline threatening the US management started dropping the interest rates to improve the economy. The interest-rate turned as low as 1.5% in June 2003 which was at its least possible point since 1958 (Gerding, 2009). This low interest-rate found its users in the shape of homebuyers and borrowers with the housing market at last expressing some development after period of declining movement. Indeed the rate of a thirty year unchanging mortgage in the year 2003 was the lowest in 40 years and thus the dream of owning a residence in US was becoming an incredibly simple reality for Americans (Ely, 2009). With increasing housing charges borrowers assumed th...