Summary Of Boyhood, Organized Sports And The Construction Of Masculinity

1197 Words3 Pages

In this application paper, I will thoroughly examine and discuss the thesis and conclusions drawn in Michael Messner’s “Boyhood, Organized Sports, and the Construction of Masculinities.” Also examined will be the research method(s) and ethical standards applied and upheld to execute his study. Lastly, I will tediously dissect Messner’s choice of theoretical perspective and determine if his chosen perspective is the most applicable. “Boyhood, Organized Sports, and the Construction of Masculinities” by Michael Messner seeks to explain how participation in organized sports results in the manifestation of masculinity in males. Messner also uses feminist analyses to explain that masculinity …show more content…

Cohen, symbolic interaction “revolves around the ability of humans to see themselves through the eyes of others and to enact social roles based on others’ expectations” (p. 21). Throughout the article, “Boyhood, Organized Sports, and the Construction of Masculinities,” Messner provides several examples of how participating in organized sports aids in forming one’s identity, more specifically as a man. One of the interviewees stated that he became involved in sports because, “…It was just like brushing your teeth; It’s just what you did. It’s just part of your existence” (p. 135). The interviewees’ statement implies that guys who do not participate in sports are inferior to those guys who do participate in sports, that participating in sports is the only activity that establishes a guy’s identity and fulfills his very existence on the planet. Another example that demonstrates Messner’s theoretical perspective can be drawn from the paragraph that discusses an instance where Messner attended a basketball camp held for young males. The young males played a scrimmage game while older males were observing. Messner states that there were “expressions ranging from puzzlement to thinly disguised terror on their faces as [the younger males] awaited the judgements of the [older males]” (p. 140). Messner’s observation and statement indicate that the approval and criticism of others are necessary to cultivate a guy’s identity, and sustain that identity. Last but …show more content…

In-depth interviews are one of the research methods used when qualitative research is desired over quantitative research. Also, by using in-depth interviews as his research method, Messner is able to acquire much more detailed information, which will enhance the quality of his final data, making the study more efficacious and fulfilling. But, as with any research method, in-depth interviews have their strengths and weaknesses. Most importantly, with any research method, optimal levels of representativeness, replicability, reflexivity, reactivity, and objectivity should be

Open Document