Sue Jozui False Advertising

479 Words1 Page

Each year people are robbed due to false advertisement, or so they think. Sue Jozui in her passage suggests that the people should boycott the advertisement business. The author supports her argument by first listing ways the advertisers advertise the products. She continues by demonstrating the “personality”of the advertisers, and telling us what they do. Jozui’s purpose is to point the flaws in advertisement so that people can see what they are truly doing so they can boycott them. The author creates a bitter tone for the consumers. One can disagree with author Sue Jozui’s argument, the people should boycott the advertising business for false advertising, using celebrities to advertise, and to form rules to regulate advertisement. Many agree with Jozui, they feel as they are getting robbed of their money and looking like fools. For instance, they feel some products themselves are unethical. One can go and buy the “good brand” for a lot more money, but then see an “off brand” for almost …show more content…

For instance, she states, “ This kind of marketing is misleading and insults the intelligence of the audience”(Jozui). Let's take two fans, one is a Dyson and the other is a Honeywell, and the Dyson lasts longer than the Honeywell. It is the consumer’s responsibility to research the ratings and comments about the product before buying, whether it would be online or from a friend. As well as the buyer, they are not being forced to buy the product, so the buyer can not argue about it. Advertisement is more of a suggestion to buy, more like the people who stand by the store, or side of their business, and verbally get your attention. They speak and try to persuade the citizen to buy their products, if they are interested then they stay, if not they walk away, with no one having a problem. The advertising business has no say if the customer has to buy anything, or researches the

Open Document