Strict Scrutiny Argumentative Essay

622 Words2 Pages

Inequality and prejudice has been around for as long as the country has been founded. Beginning as a social construct, arbitrary differences, be it sexual orientation, age, and or handicapped status, have been pointed out and discriminated against. Many advocate for stricter guidelines to be placed on new laws that might seem offense and or discriminatory. This is referred to as Strict Scrutiny and it is deemed as a necessity by some in order to remain a progressive society. This means that before a law can be made it must undergo carefully inspection by the Supreme Court. (180-181) I believe that this argument does have merit and should be the standard for these types of laws, as well as in general. The United States has had a long standing …show more content…

Understandably so, as it was a source of cheap labor that fit well with the agrarian society of the time. Plantation owners were able to make more profits and additional crops were being harvested for others to use. (Source 1). Slavery had been on the rise and it was only by the early 19th Century, that slaves began to revolt and slavery was put into questioning. (Source 1). The point being that it took a period of nearly two hundred years to abolish a practice that, by an albeit ethnocentric lens of modern day America, would typically be seen as horrendous. Society evolves and, as a result, the idea of what is acceptable within that society will inevitable change. From a sociological standpoint, the collective ideals of a society is constructed by that society. These are commonly referred to as norms. Norms are entirely based off of what the collective group of society deems is acceptable. (Source #2). Back in the 17th to 18th century, slavery was a norm for a wealthy landowner living in the United States. It was cheap labor that was not violating any laws, meaning it was de facto. There was no specific law against it, but it was discrimination

Open Document