Strict Definition Of Homeland Security (DHS)

1382 Words3 Pages

While it has been over a decade since its inception, there has yet to be a strict definition of homeland security. Homeland security is defined, by Collins English Dictionary, as “precautions taken by the government of a specified country against terrorist attacks” (homeland security, n.d.). Many definitions are seen as generalizations, and do not seem to fully encompass the entirety of homeland security. I believe the overlying non-ability to agree on a single definition is due to the overwhelming aspect of always being in a constant state of adaption, defending against ever evolving terrorism and natural disasters. Homeland security is made up of many aspects that are just like terrorism, in the sense of not having a singular detailed definition. …show more content…

In the eyes of the DHS, it as an organization has a much broader and farther reach than many definitions portray. DHS is an organization that is composed of 22 agencies and subsidiaries. “While most Americans associate the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) with terrorism and the terrorist threat, the relatively new Federal agency is actually responsible for the preparation for, the prevention of, the mitigation of, and the response to a much wider portfolio of natural, technological, and intentional hazards” (Bullock, 2016). While there are many different missions within homeland security, the overall intention is to protect the country, its citizens, and its assets. The ability for a catastrophe to happen at any given moment that can affect the entire United States, gives reason to not being able to have a single definition for homeland security. The Department of Homeland Security takes oversight on all major emergencies that affect the United States. I believe that not having a strict definition, could also be beneficial. With an ever changing world, natural disasters can become more detrimental, and terrorists adapt to defense and determine new more innovative ways to strike. Not having a strict definition can give opportunity to continually expand and grow strategy of how to approach situations and more efficiently and effectively prevent, …show more content…

The first area Bellavita discusses is terrorism. In the article Bellavita states that “at its core homeland security is about preventing terrorism and responding appropriately when we are attacked” (Bellavita, 2015). In this section Bellavita states “a national effort to prevent terrorist attacks”, national effort, includes federal, state, and local governments, the private sector, international partners, and individuals” (Bellavita, 2015). It seems clear to me, that in the fight against terrorism, everyone is needed to work in unison to try and eradicate terrorist attacks. “DHS plays a vital role in sharing information with both public and private sector partners that is essential to the nation’s security and resilience” (What We Do, n.d.). Next, Bellavita talks about how homeland security is about all hazards. In this section Bellavita speaks about how “attention to terrorism since September 11, 2001 undermined the U.S. emergency preparedness system” (Bellavita, 2015). Being that the main intention of homeland security is to defend against terrorism, it may be more beneficial to separate this agency into smaller factions, so that each agency knows what to focus on and can become more efficient and effective at their role. Recently, I believe this same narrative rings true, with all attention on

Open Document