Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of corporal punishment on a child
Negative impacts of corporal punishment on a child
The effect of corporal punishment on children
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of corporal punishment on a child
Corporal Punishment Corporal punishment is physical punishment to a child, such as caning or flogging. These techniques are used in some parts of the world. These types of punishments are usually used on smaller children. Parents, teacher’s older grandparents, use different methods of corporal punishment that are passed down from different generations. Times have changed and corporal punishment has changed, I feel like corporal punishment from back in the days was much more severe than now a days. I personally agree on corporal punishment, I believe it plays a major role in molding children and teaches them right from wrong. I feel like you should not abuse the child but I do believe a good spanking can help a child develop morals and establish a good well behaved person. According to an article written by Straus and Stewart “corporal punishment is the use of force on the child to make him or her comply with parents, but it is not to cause …show more content…
When a child is misbehaving a good spanking can make them comply to the orders of the responsible adult. From my own experiences, corporal punishment has worked for me. My mother used corporal punishment on me, she used what she called the “chancleta method.” The chaclenta, which means rubber sandal in Spanish was that she would use to spank me when I misbehaved or acted out in public. I believe that, that sandal method molded me to behave really good in guest houses and just be obedient. When I would even think about miss behaving she would bring up the chancleta and I knew with in me that I didn’t want to get hit so I changed my
There are detrimental risks and disadvantages to using spanking children as a form of punishment. Children will never actually learn the reasoning for why they are being spanked. This will not produce benefits for the child later in life; it will actually hurt them because they aren’t learning important lessons as a child. A giant risk a parent takes when choosing to spank their child is that it may lead to increased aggression by age 5. Also the more a parent spanks, the less effective it becomes. Spanking has no benefits and is harmful to children.
Spanking is the most effective form of discipline when a child knows doing something is wrong, but the child does it anyway. A child who is properly disciplined through spanking is being taught how to control her or his impulses and how to deal with all types of authorities in future environments. Parents can control their child’s future
Spanking a child is not against the law in most places. However, parents who use it in their homes are being accused of child abuse. The Chicago Tribune published an article that urged readers to report child abuse when they become aware of it. In the article “Child abuse in plain View” the author describes spanking as a type of abuse that happens behind closed doors (“Child abuse in plain View”). Like most critics of corporal punishment, the author is trying to link spanking to abuse. The author`s concern about abuse is a valid one. Abuse should be reported immediately. However, any attempt to define spanking as abuse is wrong. Spanking a child is not abuse. It is an effective way of discipline that helps guide the child into becoming a respectful and responsible person.
...important that we teach our children a system of values, and the difference between right and wrong. Where do we draw the line when it comes to disciplining our children? Spanking isn't necessarily something a parent consciously chooses. Most often, it happens when parents lose their cool, gets worked up, or feels desperate. Spanking is commonly used as a last resort of discipline. This is a controversial and emotional issue that has been debated about for years. There are other positive ways that a child can be taught without using violence as the answer. A parent’s main goal should be to help our children to become responsible, loving, self-disciplined adults, with whatever means necessary. This can be done without the use of violence. Spanking is not so much a question about right or wrong, but more about if it is an effective or ineffective form of discipline.
Contrary to popular belief, corporal punishment is still an accepted form of punishment in some countries. In these countries, many see this kind of punishment for children as normal, natural and harmless. Yet, human rights activists believe that it is damaging and must be stopped. For example, Gambian teachers are working to end corporal punishment. The Gambia Teachers' Union has been training teachers on alternative...
The term corporal punishment means the intentional infliction of pain on the body for purposes of punishment and includes slapping, hitting with objects, pinching, shaking and forcing to stand for long periods of time (Epoch 1). Family researchers define corporal punishment as " the use of physical force aimed at causing children to experience pain but not injury, for the purposes of correction and control of youthful behavior" (Day 83). Spanking is one form of physical or corporal punishment (Epoch 1).
There is a fine line between teaching a child the consequences of doing something wrong and actually beating a child. Children will not do what adults tell them to do until they learn the consequences that will come from doing something that they are not suppose to do. It is the parents’ job to teach and prepare their kids to enter a world where they will learn that bad behavior has its consequence. Children need discipline. They need boundaries and a consistent message. Children need to understand that “no” means “no.” Boundaries can be set without spanking, but the problem is that setting boundaries with spanking requires
In my eyes spanking does not fix a child’s behavior, nor help them learn right from wrong. Which is why I disagree with parents being able to spank their children. Data has shown that 13 out of a total of 17 negative outcomes they assessed, including increased aggression and behavioral and mental health problems as well as reduced cognitive ability and self-esteem (Moyer, 2016). Children should not be delayed mentally because of a form of discipline from their parents that use the discipline as a source of control. I also disagree with the opposing view because there is a way to teach a child right and wrong and a proper way to seize control.
If a child don't respect that, then the child should know what will happen next. Spanking a child won't hurt them and it's my last option when it comes to my children. I personally don't like to spank them, but I will if I have to.
I personally do not advocate spanking. I could not imagine losing my temper to a point where I thought I needed to spank my child. While I do anticipate that having children will be a real test of patience, I do not expect that I will lose my patience so much that I will spank my children. I find spanking to be a real contradiction to what most parents tell their children. Most parents do not allow their children to hit, whether they are angry or not. Even when kids think another kid did something wrong, or bad, they are still not allowed to hit. If a parent tells a kid this, and then turns around and spanks the kid when they do something wrong, how will the kid ever learn that hitting is wrong? In my opinion, there has to be a better way to discipline children. I think that sending a child to a room where they cannot interact with anyone else, and then taking away a privilege would be a better way of handling discipline. Also, when I was a child, I can remember that when I was angry, my dad would come in to my room after I had time to cool down and talk to me about why I was angry. I can remember these as really fond times with my dad. It helped me identify why I was so angry, and most of the time it was at my mom for not letting me have my way. When I could identify why I was angry, my dad and I could come up with a solution to solve the problem. I think that rather than spanking, this is a good way to discipline children.
It may not always happen, but it’s pretty effective. Discipline of a child is the responsibility of the parent. There are many ways to discipline a child. A child can be spanked, yelled at, ridiculed, punished, and grounded. They could also be verbally abused as a way to be disciplined.
Hyman (1989) says corporal punishment refers to intentional application of physical pain as a method of changing behavior. It includes a wide variety of methods such as hitting, slapping, punching, kicking, pinching, shaking, choking, use of various objects (wooden paddles, belts, sticks, pins, or others), painful body postures, use of electric shock, use of excessive exercise drills, or prevention of urine or stool limination (p.161).
Corporal punishment is defined as “an infliction of punishment to the body.” My primary reason for not approving corporal punishment would be that corporal punishment creates a negative reaction from the student’s perspective plus additional problems in the end. To discipline students in a way that will harm them into non-misbehavior is not the way to go. I claim that corporal punishment in public schools should not be permitted because it is barbaric, harmful, and in no way a method to solve personal problems.
First of all parents feel that the children are theirs, and they can spank them when they misbehave. There are many factors that lead to physical punishment: parents were to young and not ready for children, parents are going trough a divorce and need to take out their anger on something or someone, or parents do not know another way to punish their children. These children grow up to be aggressive and often abusive towards others. Although parents think this is the only way of educating their children there are many other alternatives.
Imagine seeing a student panicking about simply forgetting a pencil in her locker. She nervously walks up to the teacher with her head down and politely asks if she could go back and get it. The teacher grabs her arm. He brings her up to the front of the classroom, grabs his paddle off his desk, and smacks her hardly with the paddle, several times in front of the class. They all laugh and stare at her in a mean way. She was humiliated and later teased. Hopefully no parents would want their children to go through this. Corporal punishment in schools is wrong because students could be emotionally, physically, and mentally harmed, it creates an unsafe learning environment for children, and many students suffer from humiliation and bullying.