Sprinkle Of Hope

“River Restoration Project Offers a Sprinkle of Hope” by Daniel Weintraub published by the Sacramento Bee provides strong ethos, logos, and pathos argument for the project. The Sacramento bee located in Sacramento, California's capital city, where big businesses and where the importance lies with politics. City folks take time out of their day to read another hot topic from the Sacramento Bee. Daniel Weintraub born, and raised in San Diego, California, and lived with seven siblings. Daniel studied at San Diego University to get an economics degree and now spends his life in Northern California. This proves that Daniel knows the project he discusses. Daniel worked hard to become exceptionally credible and aware of the cause, and effect the

Farmers need the water to the most but still comprised, “...Farmers at the heart of it all have signed on to the deal...wish they could remain set in their ways,”(3 Weintraub). Farmers know that they need as much water as possible to grow their crops. Farmers do realize if nothing changes, then no one gets the water if the water runs out. They also have faith that this project will work. Farmers contribute the fruits and vegetables that we need in our daily nutrients. We suffer from the water shortage with the farmers. Therefore, supporting this project despite that fact of money problems can help us in the long run. Everyone supports this project, because of the desperate need of water. if the plan works, then we will have hope for the future, “New land and new techniques will be employed to store reserves as groundwater that can be pulled back to the surface with wells and pumps,” (8 W). This plan gives people hope that we can fix the river and how it will benefit us as a city. When the waters pumped into the pipes we can shower without worry about it suddenly shuts off. New techniques will give us the help we need to restore the river. The project may seem extortionate, but a small price to pay to mend the once inspiring river.This project can do more than just repair the river. “...an agreement that everyone could live with, and we could go forward to work together,” (15 W). This project can bring our community

The city deserves reliable water supplies, “The project has been in operation for over half a century and the whole fabric of the community here has been built on having those reliable water supplies,”(10 W). This project worked for fifty years, and now the city relies on it. The water supplies provide water to bathe, drink, and swim which most people need to do in order to stay in good health. This helps everyone do their daily activities and work. Why would anyone go against a plan that works and benefits everyone, “...politics that make this project so remarkable,” (2 W). Politicians do not want to spend money on mindless projects; they want their money to go to good organizations. This exhibit that the project a chance at a trustworthy cause. Politicians know the risk, and they have confidence that it will work. There can be a compromise between the farmers and the fish, “The same water that restores the salmon could then be pumped back uphill and used again, this time for irrigation,” (9 W). We also give the salmon they need while also giving back the farmers their water. The river helps the salmon go back to their nest, then lay their eggs, and farmers can water their crops, and sell it to the market. This way everyone can be at peace, and get what they