Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of technology on the music industry
How has technology affected music in society
The impact of technology on 20th and 21st Century Music
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of technology on the music industry
The music industry is known to be one of the most cutthroat industries in today’s time. With physical copies of music becoming more and more ostracized, digital music streaming services have increased in popularity and usage over the past few years. Musicians can now get their music out into the world more effectively through these streaming services including Spotify, Youtube, and Apple Music. In the past few years, Spotify has gained much criticism in regards to the ways the company pays musicians. However, as Spotify continues to make millions, other companies such as Apple have set a target on them. In order to survive the perils that come with the digitally advancing music industry, Spotify must work to better compensate artists. Streaming …show more content…
“These are called record one royalties, because they’re paid from the first record that the company sells” (Passman). All music producers at one point has had to pay royalties on every single album they took part on. However, producers still make more money on their end than the artist no matter what because producer royalties are computed to be less favorable to musicians, exposing yet another flaw in the music industry. A website has recently been created in hopes to sell off deeds to the music simply called Royalty Exchange. Royalty Exchange allows songs to share parts in the royalty amounts. CEO Sean Peace believes his website can help the music industry get back on its feet since the physical amount of print music has drastically decreased over the last several years. “Over time, he expects laws to change to allow non-accredited investors to participate, and a secondary market for royalty shares to form” (Baverman). While Peace’s predictions might prove to be too revolutionary for this time, he is on the right track to keeping up with the ever-changing music industry and how royalties
The Web. 26 Feb. 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/media/2012/oct/10/music-streaming-songwriters-youtube-pandora>. Luckerson, Victor. The "Business & Money" Business Money Revenue Piracy Down Has the Music Industry Finally Turned a Corner Comments.
Spotify is an on-demand music streaming service that provides a two tiered service to its users. The free service allows users to listen to any song on demand within the application’s music catalogue, but with the presence of ads. The premium service, however, is completely ad free. Launched in 2008 in Sweden, Spotify has grown and currently has over 24 million active users. (Sisario, B) As a result of several deals struck with EMI, Sony, Universal, and Warner Music Group, Spotify currently holds a music catalogue of roughly 20 million songs.
With new technology comes new possibilities and more people to thrive financially, popularity,negatively. It just so happens that Spotify has been able to thrive in all of those categories, now being the biggest music industry in the world they have some major responsibilities and opportunities. In just the matter of the past few months Spotify has managed to add 20 percent to its worth by bringing in new subscribers and add sales. But that's not the only significant thing on Spotify’s agenda with huge lawsuits, where they could lose a big chunk of change and hurt more than just their pocketbooks. Along with at the end of the year they are selling shares of the company, the only problem is will the public want to buy their shares and invest
Spotify: Are artists being paid enough?Since Spotify’s launch in 2008, the music industry has changed rapidly. With download revenue down and streaming revenues hitting huge figures, artists and record labels are concerned that they are not being paid enough. Huge artists such as Taylor Swift, Thom Yorke, and Beck have all had disputes with Spotify resulting in the artists removing their catalog from the service. Whilst it could be argued that relying on sound recording revenue to survive is not a sensible outlook on the industry, it cannot be denied that Spotify needs to pay them more. Spotify (2017) announced it has over 140 million active users with a catalog of over 30 million songs and still, artists are being paid very little.
Spotify is one of the most popular streaming services. And since its breakthrough, access to music have never been easier – just type in the name of an artist or a song and press play. The advantage of it is that listeners gets to listen to their wanted music instantly and for free and artist gets paid royalties. But since spotify’s big breakthrough there has been big debates if free music streaming is going to kill the music industry or if it’s going to help it.
Introduction: In the past, music has been a costly business, where only people with a lot of money could enter and be successful in the industry. Changes in the music industry, coupled with new computer technology, have made it much easier for people without a lot of money to compose, produce, and distribute their creations. In order to get a better understanding of the music industry in comparison to 2014, one has to look at its history. There were many things that happened from the 1980’s onward, and they brought on a significant impact towards the music industry.
Consumers rely on their smartphones and laptops to listen to music on-demand. Although there are many music streaming companies, Spotify was one of the first to let consumers access millions of artist without buying individuals songs or albums. With Spotify, consumers pay for a premium subscription that allows access to every artist, album, and song within their library of
People pay low subscription fees to streaming services, and as a result of this, listeners can be exposed to new artists and help these artists become popular (“Music Industry”). New artists are exposed to more people as streaming services often increase the amount of artists that people listen to. While streaming services do result in more exposure for an artist, that’s where the benefits stop. One of the issues with streaming services is payment issues. "Public relations missteps in the early 2000s kept many musicians from speaking out about economic issues, artists and executives said... But the shift toward streaming in recent years has prompted many musicians to investigate the changes in the business and comment online (Sisario)." Artists are not being paid much for providing their music to streaming services, but these issues and artist protests are being ignored by executives of the services until a high-profile artist makes the wage disparity public. "Streaming services pay a lot less than downloads, with the artists receiving a fraction of a cent per play on the service. Newer artists could struggle with the level of payments offered by the services, opponents have argued (O’Brien).” Hardworking artists are not receiving as much money from streaming services as they did from people purchasing their albums. This
In December 2016, Apple Music hited 20 million paid subscribers within 18 months. Even though Spotify has 50 million paid subscribers, it took 8 years to hit this figure after they first launched in October 2008 (Sanchez, 2017). In fact, Seitz (2017a) cited that Apple Music offers a three-month free trial to get users hooked. Sanchez has the same point with Seitz that one reason for Apple Music to gain more subscribers comes from a three-month free trial. However, Digital trends (2017) indicated that a majority of Spotify users listen for free, and they will be able to experience Spotify’s service as long as they want.
“Artists rely on publishers to carry out the complex business negotiations involved in earning as much as possible from their music” (Frost Online). Music publishers are responsible for many financial aspects of an artist’s career, such as registration of rights, copyrights, licensing, and the collection of royalties in benefit of the artist. They are regarded as the artist’s “advocate” (Frost Online). Arguably, the most important financial device to an artist’s economic revenue is derived from royalties and licensing. This is where a music publisher would step in.
The interaction between producers and consumers in the market was as simple as buying a physical copy of artists’ album or going to their performances. Yet from the late 20th century up until now, there have been huge shifts in the way the music industry functions as a whole. As Mark Taylor states in his book, The moment of complexity: Emerging network culture, society has entered “the moment of complexity” in which things are changing faster than ever before (Taylor 3). He states that “we are … incarnations of worldwide webs and global networks whose complexity is fraught with danger as well as opportunity” (Taylor 17). This is not an overstatement even if “the modern music industry” replaces the word “we”.
However, I am a Spotify premium member too and I appreciate its service. I acknowledge Byrne’s concern about music industry, and I do emphasize it, but Spotify, Google Play, or any other streaming tools are enriching the industry right now. Since now all sounds, tracks, albums and mixtapes are produced and disturbed in digital format, the productivity has been greatly raised because the process is much faster. Streaming tools like Spotify is amplifying the industry of music, not killing it, and what makes the difference is the way the industry functions.
Spotify is on-demand streaming music player. After registration and downloading the desktop application user gains access to more than 20 million songs that are currently available on Spotify [1]. The main characteristic of Spotify’s streaming service is that it does not sell music, but it gives access to it. Streaming digital music is based on agreements with content owners - record labels, digital distributors, aggregators and publisher collecting societies, to whom Spotify pays out royalties [2]. Without these agreements there would be no music to stream. Basically, Spotify has an intermediary role as it distributes music content from right holders to listeners.
Moreover, hackers came up with new ways to remove the digital copyrights so the same as before one downloads music and distributes them around. The industry gets its revenue from selling this content, whether it’s online or in stores, this funds new projects and allows for better products in the future. The public should be aware of this, downloading the content for free, and not buying it will decrease revenue for the companies, stopping them from undertaking future projects. “Production companies should lower the price on their products, I can’t buy music for at least 20$ per album and DVDs for 30$, I only make 200$ per month,” said George Issa, a music fan who spends most of his nights downloading music from the internet, “when there is an album or movie that I really like, I try to buy it legally, I don’t think I am doing anything wrong, they are wrong making money off our backs,” he added.
The music industry started in the mid 18th century with Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. Through the decades there has been a great increase in this industry; however, the revenues for this industry have declined by half in the last 10 years. This has been caused by music piracy, which “is the copying and distributing of copies of a piece of music for which the composer, recording artist, or copyright-holding record company did not give consent” . After 1980’s, when the Internet was released to public, people started to develop programs and websites in which they could share music, videos, and information with...