Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conclusion of the danger of disposable diapers
Conclusion of the danger of disposable diapers
How disposable nappies can negatively affect our environment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conclusion of the danger of disposable diapers
Speech: Harms of Disposable Diapers
Title: The Harms of Disposable Diapers
General Purpose: To Persuade
Specific Purpose: To discourage the audience from using disposable diapers.
Pattern of organization: Refutative
I Introduction
A) Survey says children. Would rather use disposable diapers. Nothing wrong with disposable.
B) Well, in reality there are negative effects from using disposable diaper that can affect the environment and the health of you and your children.
C) Do best for family
D) Educate on the impact that producing, using, and disposing
II Body
A) Production impact
1) Environmental and health concerns right to doorstep. Chop down four or five trees to make 500 kg of fluffy wood pulp baby will use in 2 ½ years. (Catherine McDiarmid, 1997 "Environmental Concerns") Then you will need just for your child, over 2,800 cubic meters of nonrenewable natural gas to make 325 kg of plastic for the waterproof backing and packaging for the 6,000 disposable diapers your child will use.
2) (Jane McConnell, 1998, " The Joy of Cloth Diapers") It takes about 82,000 tons of plastic and a quarter million trees to manufacture the disposable diapers that cover the bottoms of 90% of the babies born in the U.S. each year.
3) (The Canadian Cloth Diaper Association, 1997, "The Facts: Cloth Versus "Disposable" Diapers) For the convenience of using disposable diapers, you are helping release wastewater produced by processing the pulp, paper and plastic that contains solvents, sludge, heavy metals, unreacted polymers, dioxins, and furans that will make their way into your neighborhood air and water.
B) Health hazards
1) Forget environment, toxic chemicals and baby. (Candace Brecevic, 2000, "Disposing of Di...
... middle of paper ...
...use reputable companies back it.
6. The work does not provide documentation of support material.
7. No bibliography
8. The author does not talk about the bad side of cloth diapers.
9. The web page is complete.
10. The website does contain links and they do work.
Reilly, Lee. "The Diaper Debate." Vegetarian Times. Mar. 1997. 90. Health Source Plus.
Galileo. 30 Oct. 2000.
1. The source is a respected magazine.
2. The source is credible because it is on the Galileo database.
3. The Author quotes many different sources of information.
4. The work was published in 1997
5. The work was published by the Sabot Publishing company
6. The work provides documentation for support material.
7. No bibliography
8. The work talks about how the greener choice for diapers may depend on where someone lives. So, no the author is not prejudice.
According to Laura Parker, a Senior Staff Writer for National Geographic, 40% of plastic is manufactured for single use, and 91% of all plastic manufactured never gets recycled.3 One of the most detrimental types of single-use plastics are microbeads, tiny plastic bits used in various cosmetic products that get washed into sewer systems and ultimately end up in our oceans. Other plastic products also become as small as some microbeads over time through the process of degradation, which turns otherwise-large plastic products into dangerous microplastics. The problem of microplastics was first realized in 2004, and the first assessment of its prominence was carried out as recently as 2015.3 As for the dilemma of the Garbage Patch itself, it was brought to the world’s attention by Charles Moore who discovered the patch in
Child providers need to know the correct way to change a diaper and appropriate ways to teach children to use the toilet in order to prevent the spread of illness.
Americans we use about 2.5 million plastic bottles per hour. Most of this plastic that we
“We know that our business activity – from lighting stores to dyeing shirts – creates pollution as a by-product. So we work steadily to reduce those harms. We use recycled polyester in many of our clothes and only organic, rather than pesticide-intensive, cotton. Staying true to our core values during thirty-plus years in business has helped us create a company we're proud to run and work for. And our focus on making the best products possible has brought us success in the marketplace” (Patagonia).
The US Container Recycling Institute estimates that 67 million plastic water bottles are discarded every day, which is enough to wrap around the planet 149 times each year. Therefore, plastic water bottles should be banned from public use. The usage of water bottles should be suppressed because they are incredibly dangerous, wasteful, expensive, and rarely recycled. Researchers have stated that plastic bottles containing water can contain many harmful chemicals. After close examination of the plastic, researchers have concluded that some plastics contain chemicals, such as phthalates, bisphenol A (BPA), endocrine disruptors, and carcinogens, which may leach into the water, especially after being stagnant for long periods of time.
are any better possible plastics out there that can be used. The 1.9 million people in
The global Fashion industry is worth 300 billion US Dollars and employs more than 26 million workers (University of Cambridge, 2006). However, it is also one of the most polluting industries worldwide. In order to produce 1 kilo of cotton, 8,000 litres of water is used.
Plastic bags have never been free. Instead, their private cost is incorporated into the price of the purchased products, but this is not the only cost of plastic bags for the consumer (Allan 2002). There is additionally a social cost, a price paid for the impact of the pollution upon the aquatic environment and, ultimately, upon the consumers own health. Of the 3.92 billion plastic bags that Australia consumes annually(Commonwealth of Australia 2016), 80 million enter the litter stream, with 1-3% entering Australian waterways (Allan 2002; Dunn, Caplan & Bosworth 2014). About 35% of aquatic life has ingested plastic, resulting in the human consumption of plastic from seafood and eventually leading to increasing cost of healthcare for the consumer
...art. A small company in Israel believes it can help. Through research they have found that jellyfish were made up of a material that could "absorb high volume of liquids and hold them without disintegrating or dissolving. They want to apply this research to the production of diapers, paper towels, and even tampons. Other small environmental groups are even urging people to start looking at jellyfish as a viable food source.
There is and has been a growing market for a product that is potentially dangerous, not only to people, but to our environment as well. This product is well-known and used daily by millions of Americans: plastic water bottles. These single use bottles of water may be convenient, but at what risks? Every second, people in America use 1,500 plastic water bottles (Mangor & Taft, 2013). After they are empty, these bottles must go somewhere, but where? Less than 25% of plastic water bottles are recycled leaving 2 billion pounds per year to find a home other than reuse (Walsh & Massey, 2013). Many people feel that they are making a wise choice in using these, but the opposite is true. Disposable plastic water bottles are not a smart choice because they contribute to global warming, produce too much waste, and could have health risks.
Abigail Barrows, principal investigator of the Global Microplastics Initiative, evaluated almost 2,000 aquatic samples and found that about 90% of the debris was microfibers (Messinger, 2016 scary science section). Synthetic fibers from artificial fabrics released through domestic washing machines account for a major part of microplastic pollution (Forster, 2016). Research conducted at the University of California at Santa Barbara found that each wash of a synthetic fleece jacket releases an average 1.7 grams of microfibers. After going through the wastewater treatment plant up to 40% end up in the world’s waters (Messinger, 2016). Plymouth University conducted a study to find out specific data about the mass, abundance and size of these synthetic fibers. Polyester, acrylic and polyester-cotton items were washed at standard temperatures of 30°C and 40°C with different detergent and fabric conditioners. The results concluded that the average washing of 6kg could release over 700,000 microscopic fibers that end up in the wastewater after passing through sewage treatments. The polyester-cotton blend was consistently found to shed the least fibers and polyester the most (“Washing Clothes,” 2016). The effort of outdoor companies like Polartec to recycle plastic bottles has proved to be doing more harm than intended, as the plastic ultimately also reaches the
Diapers are something used every single day and changed constantly. We are wrapping our babies in non-biodegradable garbage. Diaper are used every day in the US even though they are convenient with every advantage there comes a disadvantage. Diapers account for most of the landfill which influences the environment as well as individuals. According to Amber Keeper (2017) The Environmental Protection Agency reports that about 20 billion disposable diapers are dumped in landfills each year, accounting for more than 3.5 million tons of waste. Not only does it have a great effect on the amount of waste it produces they are not as disposable as they seem, and we also need to keep into account the amount of resource it takes to produce them. Amber also includes that, “more than 200,000 trees each year are lost to the manufacture of disposable diapers for babies in the U.S. alone. In addition, it takes 3.4 billion gallons of fuel oil every year to make diapers. What it comes down to is that disposable diapers use 20 times more raw materials, two times more water and three times more energy to make than cloth diapers (Amber, 2017). Diapers are using up our natural
Modern healthcare would be impossible without plastics medical products we tend to take for granted: disposable
Most people fear that BPA will have negative effects on their health, such as reproductive issues and cancer.... ... middle of paper ... ...2014. The 'Standard' of the 'Standard'. http://www.onlineeducation.net/bottled_water/water_full.jpg>.
The convenience and availability of plastic bags in Singapore have resulted in serious environmental issues such as the release of harmful greenhouse gases and threat to marine life.