Sophie Schoholl Hero Journey

902 Words2 Pages

The film Sophie Scholl reflects the repetition of the concept of the “hero from across the sea”. One of Northrop Frye's lessons on the biblical stories, he explores in detail what “the hero from across the sea” means. This theory consists of a wasteland that is ruled by the impotent old king, whose land is being destroyed by a sea monster whose only goal is to demand human sacrifice. In this story, the king's daughter “the princess tied to a rock” is chosen as a sacrifice to the sea monster, but luckily a “hero from across the sea” comes to her rescue, returning the “fertility” of the land. In the movie Sophie Scholl, this idea shows various of times throughout the film. There are three broad examples that represent this concept through …show more content…

When he offers her coffee is as if he’s also offering a way out of her eventual death, he tries to get her to confess against her brother and her beliefs so her conviction lessens. He shows mercy to her due to the methods that she used to convey her message across, she didn’t put a bomb anywhere or shot someone, she instead wrote pages and pages of well-written opinion leaflets, or how the detective describes the “peaceful means” (Sophie Scholl, 1:02:49). Due to her peaceful approach, he offers to aid her in exchange for her cooperation, but to do this she’s asked to abandon all of what she stands for to simply save her own skin. Naturally, she refuses to work with them and stands firmly in terms of her view of the war that Hitler and the nazis prologue. The detective, after she refuses his help becomes infuriated once again and dashes towards the window, yelling “God doesn't exist!” (Sophie Scholl, 1:08:59). After hearing this, Sophie pushes the cup of coffee the detective had given her, the cup of coffee that symbolizes his proposal to help her, away from herself. By doing this she expresses both her distaste towards him, resulting god as well as the fact her honestly, values and ‘consciousness’ can’t be bought or bribed. Nevertheless, he doesn't give up on the ‘princess’ and tries to make her understand that even if being tied to a rock is due to the …show more content…

First of all, once she already confesses to contribute to the making of the leaflets she never mentions any names, even is it can reduce her sentence - protecting her own skin isn't what’s important to her, but to change people’s minds for the best is. The detective pressures her multiple time to drop names of member of the white rose, due to all the “we” that are in the leaflets, but to this she replies that she and her brother alone were the ones to write the immense amount of leaflets, and that they are “the culprits he wants” (Sophie Scholl, 57:07). Also, when he fists mention the white rose she deny sit being a numerous group, or a group at all, she states “there is no group” (Sophie Scholl,

Open Document