Social Mobility In Chinatown

995 Words2 Pages

Like I said in above paragraphs, post-1965 Chinese immigrants like to settle in surburbs. As times goes on, two kinds of settlement places emerged, such as Chinatowns and ethnoburbs. The Chinatown had a long histroy that connected to the pre-WWII Chinese immigration. It was located in inner city where Chinese people were the dominant group. Most importantly, the Chinese people in the Chinatown mostly shared with similar SES. As for the social mobility, the Chinatown can be either facilitate or hinder the social mobility of Chinese immigrants. For instance, Chinatown tended to facilitate the social mobility because it was a good place where Chinese immigrants with similar SES were easily mobilized together to against the discrimination, such …show more content…

In Chinatown, the ethnic organizations were old, closed, hierarchical, and interdependent. Differently, the ethnic organizations in ethnoburbs were new, open, horizontal, and independent. In my opinion, Chinatown had many ethnic organizations that can faciliate the social mobility of Chinese immigrants. And those ethnic organizations within the Chinatown were providing tangible and intangible supports to the Chinese immigrants. The tangible support refers to physical substances, such as housing, work, education, and healthcare. In contrast, the intangible support refers to psychical support, such as the cultural familiarity, the moral meaning and the sense of being, and the psychological comfort and sense of identity and belonging. According to the article, the CCBA and six companies would provide tangible supports to Chinese immigrants as both organizations would find housing and jobs for Chinese immigrants. Besides the tangible supports, both ethnic organizations would also provide intangible supports to Chinese and Chinese American. For instance, both organizations would hold many activites to gather all Chinese immigrants and celebrate different Chinese festivals. Overall, the assistances of ethnic organizations facilitated the social mobility of Chinese immigrants as they put all Chinese immigrants together and let them interact with each others. On the other hand, ethnoburbs also had ethnic organizations that help Chinese immigrants. But in my opinion, the ethnic organizations in ethnoburbs hindered the social mobility of Chinese immigrants. According to lecture, the Pan-ethnic and rainbow coalitions both were ethnic organizations that facilitated the political participation of ethnic groups. Although both coalitions facilitated the political participation of ethnic groups, it also hindered the social mobility of Chinese immigrants.

Open Document