More handpicked essays just for you.
How social media affects politics
The influence of social media on our youth
The influence of social media on our youth
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How social media affects politics
I agree that having legitimate statistics makes an arguments more credible. One of the first things I looks for in any argument is evidence that backs it up. Sometimes it seems like the author is just offering his opinion on the subject, without any science to back it up. However, it seems like the author of your article did his research and had well backed up reasons for his points. I was particularly interested by the part about how social media is prompting the younger generations to participate more in politics. I would be interested to see the evidence for that, but even without it, I can see why that would be. Social media makes a huge impact on what we think and is the main mode of communication for the majority of young people.
In the past years, social media has grown drastically and is affecting people in many different ways. How is this happening? Those who agree social media is affecting people will convince many because of the spreading of false information, emotional appeal, and the connection social media provides to people and Cass R. Sustein, Nicholas Carr, and Eli Pariser are able to provide this information in their articles or speeches.
Taking these three points that I have discussed thus far, it is no wonder why I feel that print media is a far better source of obtaining accurate information. It is difficult to find glitter and flash on paper, therefore the meat must come from the facts. Unlike electronic media, with all their flash and glitter, whose focus is to find something that, the public would enjoy watching so that they can achieve their goals of ratings and profit. Because “…There’s No Business, But Show Business” (Postman, 98)
Social media has become ever-present—which means there are more worldwide debates happening on different issues today than at any time in the past. A journalist suggests, “Because politicians and their campaign managers realize emotions often trump logic, they use numerous illogical and unpersuasive fallacies to appeal to the masses“(Campbell). Indeed, the most commonly found fallacy on Internet conversations is the appeal of emotion. For example, which do you think is the more important issue in India at present: rape or road deaths? According to the United Nations office on drugs and crime, the number of rapes per 100,000 people is 2 (UN). And according to a government research, the number of road deaths per 100,000 motor vehicles is 212 victims (Road accidents). Although the data implies the answer, some will still reply to the question with “rape”—which is an example of how emotionally susceptible we are as a species. A rape case is a story. A road accident is a number. Rape stories appeal to the public more than accidental road deaths. The media doesn’t report road deaths; there are too many of them to keep track of. Also, a headline that says “rape” would attract way more attention than a headline that says “accidental road
What determines a good' article from a bad' one? In the Des Moines Register on February 3, there was an article titled, More parents, doctors refuse to put kids on antidepressants," was written by Marilyn Elias. Elias is a well-known writer from USA Today, and has written on topics such as stress, marriage, and health. The article was about the effects on children, ages 18 and younger, taking depression pills. There are many elements that establish a good' article from a bad' one. Some of these elements would be the content, reader, and credibility.
In the first article, Some Students Rebel Against Healthy School Lunches, their claim is USDA offering seconds on fruits and vegetables did not solve the conflict. The reporters claim is valid because they give facts and statistics to help explain the argument. Overall their argument was logos and not pathos. The text says, “ The week before, all 111 vegetable containers served were thrown away.” This shows they are trying to reduce the obesity but it isn’t helping because the kids are still going through the container of food fast. This is good evidence because it is logos, it gives good evidence to back up their claim , and it is not opinions it is statistics. Overall , the reporter of the first article, Some Students Rebel Against Healthy School Lunches, did a good job of backing up their argument,
This device may not appear as much, but it does not lack effectiveness. Logos is the usage of facts and statistics in a piece used to appeal to the audience’s logic. Obama states, “After Connecticut passed a law requiring background checks and gun safety courses, gun deaths decreased by 40 percent -- 40 percent. Meanwhile, since Missouri repealed a law requiring comprehensive background checks and purchase permits, gun deaths have increased to almost 50 percent higher than the national average” (Barack 21). The use of this statistic was the most powerful argument Obama made in his speech as it had demonstrated the effectiveness of gun control. Although conservatives believe freedom of firearms aids in the prevention of tragedy, the fact obviously poses a different perspective. Gun control can significantly reduce the murder rate using
The concept of stereotypes is what we have been created in our presumptions of a person without even having an idea of how they are. It is a common thing in our society on which sometimes it can create tolerance or intolerance toward other groups because of different ideas or traditions. The film by Gregory Nava My Family and the book by Victor Martinez Parrot in the Oven: Mi Vida are clear examples of the concept of stereotypes. In addition, the film Real Women Have Curves by Patricia Cardoso demonstrates some of the ways stereotypes can affect one’s own ethnic group. Racial stereotypes can be good or bad creating influences toward a group. In this case, stereotypes can create bad influences causing misperceptions, confusion within the same
...e. The points that the author (a former draftee himself) makes to support his argument by referring to his own experiences as well as putting in statistics he has obviously researched extensively before referring to them in his article. Rangel introduced a statement that said people should participate in compulsory conscription to ease the burden of military service off of the groups of people who serve because they have to. I believe there is enough evidence offered to make this article a legitimate source of information, for my research paper. It is quite clearly an opinion, but it is quite objective. There is no mudslinging against the other side. I can use this article as a primary source of information, because this author himself was a former draftee and knows the process that results in the draft being implemented. It has enhanced my knowledge in the subject.
Wilson’s argument is centered around statistics and facts, however on many occasions he does not include a source to where he found his evidence. For example, in the eleventh paragraph he discusses a great point that, “in fewer than 2 percent of the gun fatalities was the victim someone mistaken for an intruder,” (127) but fails to provide any statistical proof that could verify his point. By overlooking the importance of including his sources, Wilson’s argument could easily be seen as untrustworthy.
The article was well balanced between showing statistical information, and opinions. I was more interested in reading the article when I saw that the author had included information on history. For example,” In post-war America, President Harry Truman signed into law the Displaced Persons Act of 1948, an emergency measure that responded to the influx of refugees searching for stability in the aftermath of World War II.” (Padilla-Rodriguez 14). This information was interesting to come across because it was new information to
Stereotypes In the Media Stereotypes play an important role in today's society and particularly in propaganda. According to the Webster's Dictionary, stereotyping is defined as a fixed conventional notion or conception of an individual or group of people, held by a number of people. Stereotypes can be basic or complex generalizations which people apply to individuals or groups based on their appearance, behaviour and beliefs. Stereotypes are found everywhere in the world. Though our world seems to be improving in many ways, it seems almost impossible to liberate it from stereotypes.
Johnson, Kirsten A., and Susan Wiedenbeck. "Enhancing Perceived Credibility Of Citizen Journalism Web Sites." Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 86.2 (2009): 332-348.
Surely, the media today has collected information and data even without knowledge of it, Facebook has proved my profile picture on Google search, along with other people that has the same kind of name and similar abbreviations. However, it says very little about me, yet looking up my idol, an influential artist, that sung about how It feels when life is in a stress and terrible living condition in the black community. Nevertheless, I google myself I’ve learned that Google has my Facebook profile picture posted, when I search with my name it showed up the Facebook account I have, which is a nice picture by the way. First, I notice that I didn’t complete all the questions on the Facebook profile. Second, there wasn’t anything bad written
A stereotype is defined as a widely held but fixed and oversimplified image or idea of a particular type of person or thing. There are multitudes of stereotypes in our society today ranging from the physical attributes of a person or groups of people to the behaviors of a person or groups of people. According to An Introduction to Logic, “Often the fallacy of hasty generalization can lead to damaging stereotypes made on the basis of just a few examples. Stereotypes about women, religious groups, minorities, ethnic groups, and so forth are often based on this type of reasoning” (Mosser, Ch. 4, pg. 13). Insufficient evidence is often the cause of inaccurate stereotypes and can be detrimental for everyone involved. Throughout my life, I have been placed into three stereotyped categories for example: being a redhead and hot-tempered, being a Christian that hates gays and finally, being married to a black man and will inevitably end up divorced because of the differences within the black and white cultures, these are fallacies that do not have any validity.
In terms of the research itself, I feel that the sample was appropriately selected; however the results may change if posts from other social media sites were included. Also, it would be interesting to see if further research in to other elections, not just those for the United States congress, would produce the same results.