Social Issues In The God Of Small Things By Arundhati Roy

4145 Words9 Pages

Arundhati Roy, the acclaimed post colonial novelist and activist, won the Man Booker Prizes for her first novel The God of Small Things in 1997. She is deeply involved with India’s social problems, particularly those concerning the socially marginalized and dispossesed people, ie., dalits women etc. She has also written about injustices in her works of nonfiction. According to Roy, “there is an intricate web of morality, rigor, and responsibility that art, that writing itself, imposes on a writer”.1 In these lines from Power Politics, Roy avidly defends the writers freedom of expression and his /her obligation to point out issues of social injustice. The God of Small Things is about several things but one of the chief issues it brings into
She was born in post independence India when the oppressive societal rules had become weak. She is like her mother Ammu. She lives a life of Rebel her whole life. She rejects society and is rejected by the society. Rahel’s sufferings is not only because she is the daughter of Ammu but also because of her rash nature. She acts without thinking of its consequences. Rahel loves Ammu very much. She is a silent watcher of Ammu’s sufferings. Rahel yearns for love and attention but she couldn’t get. Both the twins, Rahel and Estha were unwelcomed in the family because their mother did intercommunity love marriage divorced and came to her parent’s home to live as a burden. Nobody cared for the childrens. Baby Kochamma was after the childrens making them feel inferior. Arrival of Sophie Mol added more pains to the twins. Both Sophie Mol and Rahel are the products of intercommunity marriage but they are not treated the same. Sophie is seen as angel where as Rahel as demon. Kochu Maria, the cook compared Rahel with Sophie Mol as
Arundhati Roy seems to ask who is responsible for the oppression and miserable condition of women. The God of Small Things is a story of the sufferings of Mammachi, Baby Kochamma , Ammu and Rahel. All these women belong to high upper middle class family, well educated, financially strong but are victim of gender inequality and patriarchal oppression. All of them revolted against oppressive laws in their own way. They wanted freedom and identity of their own. In patriarchal society as we have in India, the condition of women becomes worse when few womens get authoritative role in family, conspire with male members and become an instrument of oppression. The strange thing is that they themselves are victims of patriarchy at some point of time but later they become a part of this oppressive system. This proves the saying that women is the biggest enemy of women. Mammachi and Baby Kochamma got authoritative role in the family after the death of Pappachi. Both were victims of patriarchy but played significant role in bringing misery and death of Ammu. They couldn’t understand Ammu’s loneliness, her anxiety for childrens and her painful unsuccessful marriage. They become her enemy and increased her mental sufferings. They favoured caste system and become hostile towards Ammu for having an affair with low caste Velutha. For them family honour and status was more important than Ammu’s life.

Open Document