Social Changes In Ancient Rome

836 Words2 Pages

About 1500 B.C.E, the Rome area was mainly controlled by the Etruscans, a dynamic people profession in merchant and trade. As they continued traded with different area along the Mediterranean Sea, they found the Italy island is an idea place to avoid war and risks from other country while the center of it is Roma. They started to bring a large volume of traffic and commodity to Roma so that its politic and economic were gradually developed. When the wealthy classes acquired more monetary power, they needed political power to steady benefit as well. In 509 B.C.E, the Roma elites replaced the monarchy with an aristocratic republic, aiming to guarantee the citizens’ tight to regulate business. Meanwhile, the common people were also eager to contribute …show more content…

The Roman Mediterranean experienced both economy and social development as the state expanded and united new area into the network of trade. Because of the unequal distribution of benefit, the class conflicts become more extremely, and the administration of wide land also met the inefficiency. Moreover, the unfair distribution of land caused more political and social tension so that many civil and military leaders gradually ignored the republican constitution and applied a centralized imperial form of political form. Gradually, the economy in Roma changed to money-based that the land owner’s wealth was not stable anymore, and the social was in a mess as more unjust policy appeared. During these disorder decades, a great general called Julius Caesar became very popular in Roma because of his military achievements and he also favored liberal policies and social reform. As more people decided to follow him, he named himself as the master of Roman state for live with centralized political and military functions. His policies established a centralized, imperial form of government for Roma and its possessions, however, they also negatively affect the profit of Roman elite, who murdered him

Open Document