Social Capital Theory Essay

1058 Words3 Pages

In order to give an answer to the question presented in the problem formulation and also examine the problem from a different perspective/point of view, theory of social capital will be used.

For many past years, social capital has become known as one of the greatly used concept in different spheres of life and disciplines like Sociology, Philosophy, Political sciences, Economics and essential in policy making, mass media and daily interaction (verbalization). A number of societal and economic problems are explained using the concept of social capital. It can be debated that social capital has become increasingly popular in the past years because of it’s wide use in social policy and economic progress. The undeniable or sure fascination …show more content…

Putnam was a political genius who studied social capital and its relation to civic engagement. Social capital having formerly been known to only a few sociology and economy theorists, it is perhaps right to state that his books introduced the concept of social capital to the populace or widespread public. The greatest praised titles comprise the best selling ‘Bowling Alone: The collapse and Revival of American Community’, ‘Better Together: Restoring the American Community’, which was published in 2003, shows the study of new forms of social connectedness. His previous book ‘Making Democracy Work’ and ‘Bowling Alone’ are among the most cited books in the social sciences worldwide. In the time of his academic career Putnam wrote fourteen books that were later translated into twenty …show more content…

Also, he employed his encounter with the provincial regime in Italy to push forward his difference of opinion, in his view, when people come together, it strengthens the plan of action through which they can work out their problem, (Putnam 2000: 288). Additionally, the concept of “bridging and bonding” social capital will be applied. Putnam in his book, speaks of two types of social capital: He says bonding takes place when a person interacts with people who are of the same nature relating to race, age, religion and many more whereas bridging takes place in socialization with people who are dissimilar. He adds that both bonding and bridging strengthen each other. Accordingly, with the decrease of the bonding capital undoubtedly comes the decrease of the bridging capital leading to serious tensions. Nevertheless it’s incorrect to conclude that when one has a lot of bonding capital, one cannot have bridging capital, and when bridging capital increases, bonding capital reduces (Putnam

Open Document