Social And Cultural Anthropology: A. R. Radcliffe Brown

1119 Words3 Pages

Mother-in-laws can often be the bane of a man’s existence. In American culture, jokes are often made about wanting to avoid a mother-in-law at all costs. For example, a recent BMW car commercial depicts a new feature in the car which can read texts out loud by showing a man pulling into his driveway and receiving a text from his wife that his mother-in-law was over visiting. The man immediately backs out of the driveway and leaves. This is what anthropologist A.R. Radcliffe-Brown would have classified as an avoidant relationship—one common in many cultures. In addition to avoidant relationships, Radcliffe Brown also identified joking relationships. These two concepts aid in showing the functions of different social groups and the rules …show more content…

In discussing the different views of social organization, Radcliffe-Brown is mentioned as an anthropologist who focused on how groups formed and what rules held them together. Monaghan and Just define Radcliffe-Brown as a functionalist. They quote his definition of a joking relationship as “one where one party ‘is permitted, and sometimes required to tease or make fun of the other, who in turn is required to take no offense’” (Monaghan and Just 57). An avoidance relationship, on the other hand “are characterized by extreme mutual respect and a limitation of direct personal contact” (Monaghan and Just 57). The authors then go on to describe Radcliffe-Brown’s analysis of these relationships and showcase his conclusions that they are “standardized social relationships” used to regulate two potentially awkward or conflict-prone situations such as with a sister-in-law, generally normalized through joking, or a mother-in-law, typically normalized through avoidance (Monaghan and Just 57-59). These customary relationships give people a way to navigate tricky social waters. Suzette Heald wrote an article, Joking and Avoidance, Hostility and Incest: An Essay on Gisu Moral Categories, about joking and avoidance relationships …show more content…

Kin can never be a joking relationship because of the principle of respect. A slight exception is made between grandchild and grandparent as there is no direct competition between them, however, their joking is greatly reserved in comparison to the joking relationship between non-kin (385). Men are typically the only ones who form joking relationships and only form one joking relationship with a non-kin member (383). The relationship is begun by killing a dog, which represents disorder, and thus the relationship is said to be a peace pact but founded on violence (384). The relationship involves incendiary insults, stealing in turn, and approaching physical violence but not quite crossing that barrier (382). Heald sees both of these relationships as a product of restraint, which is explained in further detail below. Additionally, both avoidance and joking relationships are “contrasting dramas of renunciation; of love and sexuality in the one instance and of hatred and warfare in the other” (Heald 390). They are extremes of societal interaction that enable society to function in a moral and correct way according to Gisu

More about Social And Cultural Anthropology: A. R. Radcliffe Brown

Open Document