Snyder V Phelps Case Summary

861 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Social justice in the united states

The Snyder v. Phelps et al Supreme court case in 2011 was one of the most controversial cases in United States Supreme court history. Fred Phelps, the leader of the Westboro Baptist Church, took his followers to picket the Snyder’s son. Snyder’s son, Marine Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder, was killed in action. The Westboro Baptist Church came holding up signs stating such things as, “Thanks God For 9/11”, or “Thank God for Dead Soldiers”. After seeing these signs, the grieving family attempted to take them to court, hoping to silence them. Originally Snyder won, until through multiple appeals the case eventually found its way in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court eventually ruled in favor of Phelps 8-1. Fred Phelps had founded the Church during 1955 in Topeka, Kansas. The church is mostly made up family members of Fred Phelps. The Westboro Baptist Church was founded on the belief that America is doomed and God hates America. They believe this is due to America’s leniency on homosexuality in the country. They attempt to spread this message by picketing funerals, mainly those soldiers killed in action. Since their founding, they have picketed approximately 600 funerals across the country. Matthew Snyder was killed in Iraq. His family planned a funeral through a local Catholic church in their hometown of …show more content…

The police gave them a spot to picket and instructions to follow during their protest. Throughout the protest their was no profanity or violence used by the church. The Church followed the instructions they were given and stayed at all times at least 1,000 feet away from where the funeral was being held, as instructed by the police. The funeral procession did however at one point pass 200 to 300 feet away from where the picketing took place. Snyder was able to see the tops of the signs, but could not read what they had

Show More
Related

  • Washburn V. State

    1211 Words  | 3 Pages

    The evidence presented to myself and the other juror’s proves that Tyrone Washburn is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the murder of his wife, Elena Washburn. On March 12, 1979 Elena Washburn was strangled in the living room of her family’s home. Her body was then dragged to the garage, leaving a trail of blood from the living room to the place it was found. Her husband, Tyrone Washburn, found her in the family’s garage on March 13, 1979 at 1:45 A.M. When officer Dale Chambers arrived at the scene he found her lying face down in a pool of blood. The solid evidence in this case proves only one person, Tyrone Washburn, is guilty of murder.

    Read More

  • The Dred Scott Decision

    2548 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Dred Scott decision of the Supreme Court in March 1857 was one of the major steps

    Read More

  • Overview of Sossamon vs. Texas

    2911 Words  | 6 Pages

    In turn Sossamon filed a suit against the state of Texas, also to include their state and prison officials. The case was known as Sossamon v.Texas. Sossamons initial argument was the prison systems interference with his ability to practice his religion not only violated the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act or “RLUIPA” and Ins...

    Read More

  • Texas v. Johnson Argumentative

    691 Words  | 2 Pages

    To this day, Americans have many rights and privileges. Rights stated in the United States constitution may be simple and to the point, but the rights Americans have may cause debate to whether or not something that happens in society, is completely reasonable. The Texas v. Johnson case created much debate due to a burning of the American Flag. One may say the burning of the flag was tolerable because of the rights citizens of the United States have, another may say it was not acceptable due to what the American flag symbolizes for America. (Brennan and Stevens 1). Johnson was outside of his First Amendment rights, and the burning of the American flag was unjust due to what the flag means to America.

    Read More

  • Lawrence V. Texas

    1308 Words  | 3 Pages

    As with all Supreme Court cases, the meaning of the Lawrence v. Texas will deepen when in the process of its interpretation as well when it is cited by the lower state courts and The Supreme Court itself. In any situation, the decision in the case contains the brave declaration of the dignity and freedom of choice of all homosexual individuals. It was celebrated by the homosexual activists fighting for the equal rights in the hope that the future legal advances may follow. Social conservatives have deplored the decision for the same reason. Nevertheless, the ruling of the Court was neutral, therefore it was fair.

    Read More

  • Case: Burwell V. Hobby Lobby Stores

    386 Words  | 1 Pages

    This Hobby Lobby case was decided totally upon the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) that became law in 1993. The problem is the Supreme Court’s ruling in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores is one of the demonstration that anti-discrimination regulations can practically induce heightened discrimination than they inhibit. This regulation, RFRA has effectively worked to protect that several anti-discrimination laws. However, Regulations that target religion on purpose are and should be legally suspect, but the RFRA progress more and more, empowering intentional omissions to laws that oppress religious activities. The RFRA menaces rational set of laws, including Unite States Constitution and Amendments forbidding discrimination against other

    Read More

  • The Restriction of Free Speech in McCullen v. Coakley

    782 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Supreme Court cases, it is difficult to determine which side the judges will rule because the cases are often very controversial. The Constitution and one’s rights need to be protected, and if it goes against the Constitution, the consequences will not be agreed upon. As a result, in Holmes’ analysis, it ultimately brings to light the importance of results often being black and white, but they truly aren’t. The public still has a long way to go in not only understanding the law, but also the reasons why judges make these different decisions. But the most important thing is that the U.S. Constitution is always followed.

    Read More

  • Gunn V. Minton Case Summary

    1007 Words  | 3 Pages

    The legal malpractice case was first heard in the Texas State Court where Minton lost the suit. It was later appealed to the Texas State Court of Appeals; where the question of federal jurisdiction over the malpractice suit arose due to the patent issue. Minton lost the appeal.

    Read More

  • The Fourteenth Amendment

    730 Words  | 2 Pages

    For some background, this case escalated to the Supreme Court since several groups of same-sex couples from different states, sued state agencies when their marriage was refused to be recognized. As it escalated through appeals, the plaintiffs argued that the states were violating the Equal Protection clause and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Equal Protection, according to the Constitution refers to the fact that, “any State [shall not] deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law…” (23). The opposition of this case was that, 1) The Constitution does not address same-sex marriage as a policy, and 2) The sovereignty of states regarding the decision. Ultimately, and according to the Oyez project, the Court held that “[the Amendment] guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects, and that analysis applies to same-sex couples,” and therefore, same-sex marriage is a fundamental liberty.

    Read More

  • Essay On The Scottsboro Trial

    1196 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the seven years of trials, appeals, and retrials, the Scottsboro Boys faced monumental challenges legally. Their trials and retrials were not even remotely close to fair and just. These trials set a precedent for similar cases in both the South and North. This case caused protests all over Europe and America, fighting the injustice the Boys suffered. Similar actions are being taken for gay rights today. There may not be a sensational criminal case involving gay rights, but there certainly have been many landmark and newsworthy civil cases in the state and federal supreme courts in the United States for gay rights recently. The injustices shown in the Scottsboro cases may not be able to be resolved for the nine Boys, but we can learn from these inequities and apply them to modern day issues, like gay rights. Fiat iustitia ruat caelum.

    Read More

  • Ward V Texas Case Study

    1219 Words  | 3 Pages

    On the 11th of June, 1982 following the conviction of a criminal offense, Robert Johnson was sentenced to two years probation. The terms of his probation included his person, posessions, and residence being searched upon reasonable request. When a search warrant was executed for Johnson’s roommate, officers testified that with enough reasonable suspicion, they were able to search Johnson’s living area as well.

    Read More

  • Arizona V. Hicks Summary

    695 Words  | 2 Pages

    Arizona V. Hicks discusses the legal requirements law enforcement needs to meet to justify the search and seizure of a person’s property under the plain view doctrine. The United States Supreme Court delivered their opinion of this case in 1987, the decision is found in the United States reports, beginning on page 321, of volume 480. This basis of this case involves Hicks being indicted for robbery, after police found stolen property in Hick’s home during a non-related search of the apartment. Hicks had accidentally discharged a firearm into the apartment below him, injuring the resident of that apartment. Police responded and searched Hicks apartment to determine the identity of the shooter, recover the weapon, and to locate other victims.

    Read More

  • Mathew Sheppard: A Brief Summary And Analysis

    457 Words  | 1 Pages

    This writer remembers watching Mathew Sheppard’s story unfold on the news one early morning. One could not believe that this young man was treated so inhumane for being gay. Listening as the news reporter reported that Sheppard was beat, and tied to a fence and left to die was unrealistic at the time. Why would anyone treat another human this way is baffling? Even though, Sheppard eventually did pass away from his injuries, he was not forgotten. As a result of his death, the Department of Justice (2015) “create[d] a new federal criminal law which criminalizes [when someone] willfully cause[s] bodily injury” to another human based in their “race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability” (Department

    Read More

  • Jehovah's Witnesses

    1573 Words  | 4 Pages

    Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York v. Village of Stratton. 536 U.S. 150

    Read More

  • Blood And Soil Case Study

    544 Words  | 2 Pages

    This case was then taken to the Supreme Court, where Supreme Court justices deliberated whether this law violated free speech under the United States Constitution. In a 7-1 decision in favor of Brandenburg, the court upheld that this specific law was unconstitutional, as it violated the right to free speech. However, the Supreme Court justices also upheld that if any act of free speech incited lawless action, state law could prohibit it. This decision, in its true effects, has preserved hate groups such as the KKK by allowing individuals to continue spreading hate in America. However, recently, the alt-right has made several violent protests around the South-- and no true action by the United States has stopped them. These groups remain continuously protected by this heinously abhorrent decision of the Supreme

    Read More

More about Snyder V Phelps Case Summary

Open Document