Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A revaluation of all values
The influence of religion on society
The influence of religion on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A revaluation of all values
In Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morals, he discusses morality and divides this concept into two parts: “master morality” and “slave morality.” To briefly summarize, master morality, which was usually followed by the nobility, or ruling class, emphasized individuality and being strong willed – essentially promoting the creation one’s own set of values. In contrast, slave morality stemmed from oppression by, and resentment towards, the ruling classes onto the lower. The idea of “herd mentality” may be related to “slave morality.” Slave morality and being a part of the “herd” promote the idea of conforming humanity into calculable human beings, which in turn serve to oppress the masses. In Western society and culture, religion and morality have often intertwined and they have reflected their values onto each other. Today it is sometimes impossible to make a distinction between the two, since their influence has transcended generations. In modern Western culture, religion and society preach conformity. In order to be a “good” person, one must conform to the values imposed by the church1 and state. For example, both institutionalized religion and society in the USA and many other countries tend to follow a patriarchal system, where men are viewed as leaders, and are generally given authoritative positions. This blatant sexism can be found within religion, as in Christianity the Bible states, “But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence” (2 Timothy 2.12). This passage explicitly states that women are not permitted to hold power over men, and this quote is part of a text belonging to a religion that 73%2(pew research forum) of Americans follow. Whether or not a person is Christia... ... middle of paper ... ...to enter the “Lion stage” in which one must have the strength and power to affirm one’s own values. In conclusion, society imposes social norms to make humans calculable. Nietzsche states that this idea relates to the idea of rendering people predictable, which in turn allows them to make and keep promises. However, with this idea of humanity becoming predictable, a herd mentality is adopted. When someone is outside of this herd or doesn’t fit into the “social straitjacket,” they feel guilt for not conforming, and this guilt serves to “keep them in line.” Society falls into a routine of production, consumption, and then death, since this is what is presented as normal and good. This routine is oppressive and it internalizes man’s natural instincts, but that is the sacrifice that one has to make in order to be a part of what is now considered modern civilization.
... slave morality that has choked the world ever since its inception. Nietzsche has been able to lift himself above the constraints of ressentiment in order to comprehend more fully what a truly great man is, and from what he has seen, he has been disgusted with the individual, wholly disappointed in human beings. He recognizes the nearly endless potential of the human mind, but must sadly turn away from the horror before his eyes that allows the poor, the meek, and the less able to command the respect of society. According to the general public, the birds of prey have become enemies to the world because of their perfect sight, their sharp claws, and their unequivocal ability. Nietzsche sees the lambs as the enemies to the world, the lambs who gaze up at the birds of prey with ressentiment and argue that it is better to be mediocre, it is far more just to be ordinary.
Nietzsche thought nobility was to see one’s self as the center and origin of value. He believed that people in power force common people into bidding their will, and those in charge are separated based on good or bad measures of their value. The rulers, or people in charge have master morality, the people who do their bidding have slave morality. Slave morality is how common people make their lives more bearable by using Christian ethics such as kindness and sympathy.
1. The insight that each of these sources offers into slave life in the antebellum South is how slaves lived, worked, and were treated by their masters. The narratives talk about their nature of work, culture, and family in their passages. For example, in Solomon Northup 's passage he describes how he worked in the cotton field. Northup said that "An ordinary day 's work is considered two hundred pounds. A slave who is accustomed to picking, is punished, if he or she brings less quantity than that," (214). Northup explains how much cotton slaves had to bring from the cotton field and if a slave brought less or more weight than their previous weight ins then the slave is whipped because they were either slacking or have no been working to their
Nietzsche introduces the differences between what he names later in his first essay the "master morality" and "slave morality." The first master morality is the ideas of the nobles, including solders and other ruling classes. This he says is power deciding what good and bad is they see the qualities they possess such as physical strength, political power, over all better health and longer lives, monetary gains wealth and what they see as contentment, all these things are what they see as what is good, after all these are the things that set them apart. The nobles then see the di...
The terms of Master and Slave Morality are easy to misunderstand. First of all, the assumption that there is master morality vs. slave morality already makes you believe master morality is the superior one, just by the words itself. Master morality is overall shaping slave morality. Following one another causes a misguided idea of the terms good and evil replacing the idea of “good” and “bad”. But, some would say few people disagreed with Nietzsche because no one really knew Nietzsche existed during his own time, his impact came later and his message became clear in fact
Nietzsche's master-slave morality describes the way in which moral norms shifted through the through eras, from pre-scocratic times to the modern age founded upon Christian and Jewish beliefs. During pre-socratic times, value was dominated and enacted by the master class, who saw themselves and what they did as good. Value was defined along their terms of good- what was good for the master class was itself good. This notion of value was designed along the lines of nobility and purity, which included traits such as courage, beauty, strong-will and happiness. The master-class said yes to existence, and their values affirmed their belief system, which, due to their position of control, created their disposition as elite and influenced the norms for morality at their time. Since the master-class viewed themselves as good, they distinguished themselves from the weaker individuals, those not in power, as bad. The weaker individuals, in pre-socratic times known as plebeians, according to the master-class, were weaker for various reasons. Be it due to their unhappiness, victimization to unfortunate circumstances, weak-will or a lack of courage, pride, or a combination of any of these despicable or non virtuous values. According to the master-class, adherence to these weak values initiated a form of fear within the plebeian, which created a lack of self worth and a lack of freedom or self-consciousness, deemed as slavery.
message was that society was rigid and it forced those which did not fit the
There is a significant difference between government and religious morals even though both are ethical authorities. These two moral authorities conflict with one another while both are to help people make sou...
Morals are usually the standards by one which lives in, whether them being good or bad. However, how about when religion influences ones morals? Religion isn’t or it doesn’t work for everyone, and that’s okay. But, there are many people out there that religion influences their morals; and the most common reason for that is that religion was influenced into them and into their morals as a child. Iri...
Individuals often yield to conformity when they are forced to discard their individual freedom in order to benefit the larger group. Despite the fact that it is important to obey the authority, obeying the authority can sometimes be hazardous especially when morals and autonomous thought are suppressed to an extent that the other person is harmed. Obedience usually involves doing what a rule or a person tells you to but negative consequences can result from displaying obedience to authority for example; the people who obeyed the orders of Adolph Hitler ended up killing innocent people during the Holocaust. In the same way, Stanley Milgram noted in his article ‘Perils of Obedience’ of how individuals obeyed authority and neglected their conscience reflecting how this can be destructive in experiences of real life. On the contrary, Diana Baumrind pointed out in her article ‘Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience’ that the experiments were not valid hence useless.
Slave morality, as portrayed by Islamic, Christian or Judaic moralities, is all about a separation of the mind and body, and hate and contempt for the meek physical body. These moralities say that sex, vanity, power, are bad, to which Nietzsche argues that they are all completely natural and part of the will-to-power - “the holy pretext of ’improving’ mankind as the cunning to suck out life itself and to make it anaemic. Morality as vampirism…” writes Nietzsche about Christian morality in Ecce Homo. To define the above qualities as good is to deny what we are - simple beasts, fundamentally like animals. The slave morality puts us in a constant debilitating war with ourselves, and is fundamentally unhealthy; it appears we have invented a system that makes us loathe ourselves and wants us to feel guilty for just being alive - “…betrays a will to the end, it denies the very foundations of life.”[@EH p67]. Morality should be life-affirming, we should embrace power, strength, adventure, and anything with a strong happy method, and feel fantastic about
This ailment began with man’s fear of punishment after the creation of communities. The shift from a free roaming beast to a self-aware community member subdued their natural will to power by imposing restrictions on instinctual actions. Man then became self-critical when turning these aggressive drives inward. However, to understand Nietzsche’s view of a “bad conscience” to be negative would be inaccurate. It is through this morality that man conquers his inner struggle. Accordingly, by turning guilt upon himself man creates an avenue towards self-sovereignty which gives mastery over the self and personal values. Nietzsche states, ‘The “free” human being, the possessor of a long unbreakable will, has in this possession his standard of value as well: looking from himself toward the others, he honors or holds in contempt; and just as necessarily as he honors the ones like him, the strong and reliable…” (2:2:37). This passage suggests morality of custom can be broken, allowing humans to say “yes” to life affirming values they desire. This self-ruling ideal furthers the assumption that Nietzsche does not think Christian morality of itself is wrong, but instead it is the inaction of man. Christian slave morality plays an important role in the concept of bad conscience. Thus, Nietzsche has an aversion to the immediate results of this conscience but deems it crucial for man to become
On page 393, Nietzsche begins the excerpt by exposing humans of their sheep mentality, “People have taken the value of these ‘values’ as given, as factual, as beyond all questioning.” Humanity—in context of a biblical, religious environment—has been plagued with blindly following morals written for the masses without question. This is akin to what is said about truth and lies in A Non-Moral Sense, “They are deeply immersed in illusions and in dream images; their eyes merely glide over the surface of things and see ‘forms.’ Their senses nowhere lead to truth; on the contrary, they are content to receive stimuli” (Nietzsche 1:115). There is a power struggle in humanity. People vie for dominance and for the chance to determine truth in order to feel superior. And if the inferior questions these truths and bestowed morals, they believe they will be punished. To recommence, “up till now, nobody has had the remotest doubt or hesitation in placing higher value on ‘the good man’ than on ‘the evil’, higher value in the sense of advancement, benefit and prosperity for man in general… What if the opposite were true? … So that morality itself was the danger of dangers?” (Nietzsche 3:393). For example, what may be considered good is having plenty
, as quoted by Nietzsche,, it is important to understand that Nietzsche believed that there was two type of moral system that really was based on many things such as income class and as well as status in the community. Nietzsche believed that depending on whether a person was a leader or a follower there were
The role of religion in politics is a topic that has long been argued, and has contributed to the start of wars, schisms (both political and religious), and other forms of inter and intra-state conflict. This topic, as a result of its checkered past, has become quite controversial, with many different viewpoints. One argument, put forth by many people throughout history, is that religion and the government should remain separate to avoid any conflicting interests. This view also typically suggests that there is one, or several, large and organized religions like the Roman Catholic Church, which would be able to use their “divine” authority to sway the politics of a given state by promising or threatening some form of godly approval or disapproval. By leveraging their divine power, individual figures within a religion, as well as the religion as a whole, could gain secular power for themselves, or over others. A second view, which was developed by many theologians through history, suggests that that without religion there would be a general lack of morality in the people and leaders of a given state, which would give way to poor political decisions that would not be in the interest of the people and perhaps even God (or the gods). This argument, however, does not address the fact that morality can exist without religion. In sociology, it is commonly accepted that social norms, which include morality, can result from any number of things. Religion, laws, or the basic desire of survival can all create these norms, so it suffices to say that as a society, our morals reflect our desire to live in relative peace through the creation of laws that serve to help us to survive. The argument of whether or not religion and politics should mix...