Six Day Creation

505 Words2 Pages

The age of the earth is one of the most debated topics of religious discussion. Quite surprisingly, the debate also exists with the Christian community. While most conservative Christians hold to a literal six day creation account, there are those who believe that the six “days” of creation are not to be taken as literal twenty-four hours days, but rather ages of time. Careful examination of the original Hebrew language as well as inconsistencies between the Genesis account and the evolutionary theory attest that the earth was indeed created in six literal days. The intended use of the Hebrew yom, is highly debated amongst scholars. Theistic evolutionists make the argument that “With such a wide usage of the word Yom for many different time periods, it cannot be claimed that Yom in the Old Testament only represents a 24-hour period”. (Greg Neyman) While it is true that the word yom cannot only be used to represent a 24 hour period, a careful study of the text shows that it was the intention of the author, Moses, to represent a 24 hour time period. Had Moses intended to describe a 24 hour time period, he would phrased it exactly the way that he did. However, if the intentions of Moses were …show more content…

Richard Niessan argues that “if each day were indeed a billion years, as theistic evolutionists require, then half of that day (500 million years) would have been dark…How then would the plants, insects, and animals have survived through each 500 million year stretch of darkness? Clearly a 24-hour day is called for.” (Niessan) The fact that the day is divided into two halves further supports the notion that the earth was indeed literally created in a 24 hour period rather than six ages. Had Moses intended for readers to ascertain otherwise, he most definitely would not have consistently included the divisions of each

Open Document