Sinners In The Hands Of An Angry God Comparison

980 Words2 Pages

Puritan literature and Rationalist literature are two contrasting types of writing that served different purposes. One example of Puritan literature is the Sermon, Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God. This was written by Jonathan Edwards and preached by him in Enfield Connecticut on July 8th, 1741. The sermon focused on us humans and how we are bound to fall into destruction if we do not seek God and save ourselves. An example of Rationalist literature is The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin. The part of this text that I will focus on is the chapter on his plan for attaining moral perfection. This chapter talks about Benjamin Franklins plan for attaining moral perfection and what he learned through it. The role of the author in Puritan literature …show more content…

Although puritan literature is more focused on religion rather than rationalist literature they both talk about the imperfection of humans. In Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God it talks about how we fall into destruction, “It implies that they were always exposed to sudden unexpected Destruction. As he that walks in slippery Places is every Moment liable to fall; he can’t foresee one Moment whether he shall stand or fall the next; and when he does fall, he falls at once, without Warning” (Edwards 1). This quote shows that just like walking on a slippery surface we are bound to fall and we won’t know when but we will fall back into temptation. In Benjamin Franklin’s Autobiography he talks about how it was hard to overcome his imperfections, “This article, therefore, cost me so much painful attention, and my faults in it vexed me so much, and I made so little progress in amendment, and had such frequent relapses, that I was almost ready to give up the attempt, and content myself with a faulty character in that respect, like the man who, in buying an ax of a smith, my neighbor, desired to have the whole of its surface as bright as the edge”(Franklin 5). It is hard and nearly impossible for humans to achieve moral perfection because we often relapse into bad habits. The same thing is seen in the sermon and in both texts we can see how when we do fall or relapse into committing wrongful actions it is always our own

Open Document