Simplarities Between the Feedings Reported by Matthew and Mark

1499 Words3 Pages

All Gospels record the feeding of the 5000; the authors of Matthew and Mark record two feedings. A doublet or two separate events? The context of the narratives, similarities and differences, whether one event or two, historical or myth and the significance for each writer will be discussed.

In the Synoptic gospels the event follows the death of John the Baptist and the return of the disciples from preaching and teaching. Mark6:39 writes, ‘the people sat on the green grass,’ suggesting spring-time, possibly April. John does not mention either event; John6:4, ‘the Passover was near.’ Passover, an important C1st Jewish feast, although not a family meal it involved going to the Temple and offering sacrifices. Therefore, the disciples would have returned, expecting to accompany Jesus to Jerusalem. ‘After this,’ John6:1, a Johannine term used to indicate passage of time.

Do Matthew and Mark record two events or is it a doublet? Scholars generally agree Mark’s gospel was first and Matthew and Luke used, it with ‘Q’ ‘M’ & ‘L’, as their source. Mark was not an eye-witness but relied on oral and other sources. Matthew is generally seen as an update of Mark; so, perhaps, not surprising Matthew also records the second feeding. Luke and John may have had access to Mark’s Gospel, but neither record two separate events.
Looking at Mark may help. In Mark6 Jesus feeds 5,000; in Mark8, 4000. The crowds have been with him all day; then three days. Five loaves and two fishes, twelve baskets of food remain; seven loaves and a few small fish, seven baskets remain. Scholars have attempted to attach Jewish/Gentile significance to these differences in numbers - too various to discuss here.
Mark8:1, ‘…….there was again a great crowd.’ I...

... middle of paper ...

...presentation of the meaning of the Christ-event, suggesting the Eucharist and the eschatological picture of fellowship and plenty. (Boring:P.326).
Josephus, a non-Christian contemporary writer of the apostles, attests that, ‘at that time there was a wise man named Jesus, a teacher, who performed wonderful works among the Jews and Gentiles.’ (Powell/Attridge:P.492). The Jewish Talmud, C5thC.E., attributes Jesus' miracles to sorcery. Opponents of the Gospels do not deny Jesus performed miracles, they just give different explanations. (Twelftree:P.50).
However, if any explanation other than historically accurate is accepted the disciples non- understanding might be explained. Overall, it is fair to say that scholarly opinion is divided on an explanation for the differences in the accounts; perhaps best explained by the writing perspective of the individual authors.

More about Simplarities Between the Feedings Reported by Matthew and Mark

Open Document