People are always looking for ways to teach their children lessons. Trickster Tales are fun ways to do so while the child may not even realize that he or she is even learning something. Many cultures are similar in their trickster tales but at the same time have different aspects, and each have their own reason to why they developed their trickster.
Trickster Tales have many similarities even when they are from different cultures. In all three the tricksters has the role of a clever deceiver. Coyote convinces Buffalo Bull not to kill him (Coyote and the Buffalo), Brer Rabbit tricks Sis Cow into getting stuck in the tree and pretends to be Brer Big Eyes to make Sis Cow leave (Brer Rabbit Fools Sis Cow) , and Anansi blinds death with flour(Anansi and Brother Death). Also the main characters take advantage of someone. Coyote kills the cow because he wants more than he was allowed (Coyote and the Buffalo), Brer Rabbit takes all of Sis Cow’s milk while she was stuck (Brer Rabbit Fools Sis Cow), and Anansi goes into death's house and takes his food (Anansi and Brother Death). There are many similar concepts even though the stories are from different parts of the world.
…show more content…
Only Coyote and Anansi had consequences for their actions. Coyote didn't receive another cow and had to go home without one (Coyote and the Buffalo). Anansi is still being chased by death (Anansi and Brother Death), but Brer Rabbit escaped from Sis Cow with her milk (Brer Rabbit and Sis Cow). Also only some of the stories include the trickster roles of numbskull and cultural hero. Coyote is a numbskull when he kicks the skull and spits on it and a cultural hero when he smokes his pipe and calls out to the gods (Coyote and the Buffalo). Anansi is a cultural hero when he gives away his daughter to the old man for a wife (Anansi and Brother Death). These tales have differences in their endings and in trickster
Two stories with two different settings, plots, and characters and yet they have many similarities, with of course a few differences as well. There are many realistic similarities and differences between “Jumping Frog of Calaveras County” by Mark Twain and “the Outcast of Poker Flat” by Bret Harte. Between the characters, plots, settings there are exceptional similarities and differences . The regionalistic qualities really shine through in all of these things.
Here are the flashbacks and foreshadowing. One of the similarities is they both had to do with animals and their parents telling them something. The other is that they have flashbacks of animals. Those are the similarities with flashbacks and foreshadowing.
Often, the trickster finds his antics to come back and hurt him, due to greedy, conceited, or boastful behavior. These tales are told in a humorous manner, meant to entertain the reader, but are specifically designed to teach a lesson about human behavior or morals. One trickster tale, “The Coyote and the Buffalo,” is the quintessential trickster story, and uses a coyote as a main character, very popular for early Native American literature. It tells of a coyote that has gotten himself into trouble with Buffalo Bull, his enemy, and has made a deal to give the Buffalo new horns. To express his gratitude, Buffalo Bull gives Coyote a young cow on the condition that he does not kill it, but only cuts off the fat. Soon Coyote gets greedy, and kills the cow for the better meat. However, he is quickly outsmarted by a woman who offered to cook the bones. She ends up stealing them, and the coyote is left with nothing. He pleads to the buffalo for another, but the buffalo will not give it to him, “and that is why there are no buffalo along the Swah-netk’-qhu.”(Allen et. al. 52) The moral of this story is that having too much greed can leave you hungry, instead of full of the riches of life you can gain by listening and following the
Lost by his parents at a young age, Pecos Bill was raised by a pack of coyotes who treated him like one of their own. When Bill reached adulthood, he left his coyote family and took up ranching and cattle herding as a profession. Most of Bill’s adventures him protecting his herd of prized cows out in the sandy desert. He rode a snarling mountain lion and a swirling cyclone to make sure they did not take his cows. Bill even used a lasso of rattle snakes to rope his whole herd at
The Canterbury Tales, written by Geoffrey Chaucer, is an older book containing a entertaining storytelling contest between a group of pilgrims on a pilgrimage. The pilgrims, on their pilgrimage, venture from London to Canterbury to visit the shrine of Saint Thomas á Becket. During their pilgrimage, the Host introduces the idea of a storytelling contest. He claims the trip to the shrine of Saint Thomas á Becket will be boring to travel in silence. The Host lays out the plan of each pilgrim telling two tales on the way to Canterbury and two tales on the way back from their adventure. Upon their return, the winner, decided by the Host for the most entertaining and meaningful tale, will receive a meal paid by the rest of the pilgrims. At his own cost, the Host guides the group of pilgrims, while the pilgrims pay for their adventure. To decide who starts the contest off, the members draw straws. The admired Knight is up first.
The underlying themes of the stories are l valid contrasts between the works. In some portions the themes are of the same facets, such as how in both books two men have a direct conflict between
They all have different themes, such as: be cautious or boastful, take advice and listen to your elders, and learn from your mistakes. These themes are what you should learn from the story and what it is about. Another difference would be they have different tribes and settings. In “The Coyote” the setting is South West-USA, and they ar the Pueblo Indians. In “The Buffalo and the Corn” the setting is in the Midwest-Great Plains and they are the Cheyenne Tribe. In “The First False Face” they are located the North Eastern-USA, and they are the Seneca Tribe. All of the stories have different problems. In the story of “The Coyote” the problem is that the coyote if against the fox but keeps falling for the foxes traps, in the story “The Buffalo and the Corn” the problem is that men(tribes) were facing hunger, and in the last story “The First False Face” the problem is that they were competing to see who was the most magical, by trying to move mountains. These are different problems throughout the three stories that the people/tribes faced. The last problem was that each story had different characters. In the story “The Coyote” the characters were the fox and the coyote, in the story “The Buffalo and the Corn” the characters were the Native American men and the Grandma, and in the story “The First False Face” the characters were The Spirit Medicine Man and
A relationship is usually seen between the teller of a tale and the tale that he or she decides to share. Chaucer’s pilgrim, the Merchant, uses his feelings on marriage to teach a lesson in his tale. The Wife of Bathe also relies on her life experience to tell her tale. The two relationships in the tales can then be compared.
Some similarities are obviously that they are both slaves who are trying to escape their misery. The characters also have a good relationship with their fathers because they taught them how to care for themselves and what to do when they need
... almost nothing alike from a superficial aspect. The stories have different historical contexts and they simply don’t have much in common to the average audience. It is easy to contrast the stories, but deep within certain elements, the stories can be linked in several ways.
Hence, the image of the trickster Coyote is the focal point in these two cultures, because of his/her never-ending desire to start the next story for the creation of the world and have everything right. Native American culture has a lot of dialogic perspectives in it; in the form of stories and conversations in which all humans and non-humans communicate (Irwin,2000, p39) and writers often highlight the importance of the oral cultural inheritance both as the notion of their being and as method for their writing. Coyote in traditional oral culture reminds us the semiotic component of sufferings of
Another major similarity is that the characters in both mythologies treat most animals like people. For example, either mythology might say something like, the evil badger plotted to steal food from the main warehouse, instead of just the badger stole food. One specific example in a Japanese myth is “The rabbit wanted to help” , which shows that the rabbit was a character comparable to people.
The common elements in the two stories are the wolf, Little Red (Riding Hood/Cap), her grandmother, and her mother. The beginnings of the stories are also similar: Little Red?s mother sends her to grandmother?s house because the grandmother is ill. Both stories mention that Little Red is personable, cute, and sweet. This is something that, on initial inspection, seems irrelevant but holds a deeper meaning for the symbolism behind the story. In both stories, the wolf, wandering through the woods, comes on Little Red and asks where she is going. When Little Red responds that she is going to visit her sick grandmother, the wolf distracts her with the suggestion that she should pick some flowers so that he can get to her grandmother?s house first. The wolf arrives at Little Red?s grandmother?s house before Little Red and disguises his voice in order to be let in. When he is let into the house, he promptly devours the grandmother and disguises himself in her clothes in order to eat Little Red as well. At this point, the two narratives diverge.
While the setting for Sherman Alexie's "This is what it means to say Phoenix, Arizona" and William Faulkner's "A Rose for Emily" differ, their settings develop different themes and perspectives. These two stories are similar in some ways and different in others because, one is in the Northwest of Arizona vs. the Deep South. Depending on where you are can determine the mood, tone, and sometimes it can even symbolize something. In “This is what it means to say Phoenix, Arizona” the settings change throughout the story. As for “A Rose for Emily” the setting stays the same through the whole story. The setting helps to set the mood, it can have a symbolic meaning and sometimes it helps in explaining why the characters act the way that they do. In these two stories the setting is important and plays a major role.
The biggest similarity between the two stories is the notion of moral decline; the beings start off as peaceful things that don’t need homes, food or anything. As time goes on they need those things and more. After a while they start stealing from each other and eventually hurt each other.