Showdown In The Sonoran Desert Summary

1220 Words3 Pages

Dr. Ananda Rose's Showdown in the Sonoran Desert starts in a remote land between the Tucson area, which extends from Yuma, Arizona, to the New Mexico state line of Sonora where about 2,000 migrants have died attempting to make it to the United States since the mid-1990s. The book depicts the clash between two clearly hopeless dreams, one of migrant people of dignified value, the other of terrifying foreigner who has violated the law.
In the first portion of the book "God in the Desert: Migrant Deaths and the Rise of Border Ministries," Rose examines the perspective of two pro-migrant groups like Humane Borders and No More Deaths that are determined by religious belief, empathy for those who wind up passing away in the desert, and resistance …show more content…

Yes, most of those who come illegally are hard-working people looking to enhance their current circumstance, yet who bring with them dangerous wrongdoing including drug smuggling, and often destroy property. Surely the passings are tragedies, yet a country has the right to control its borders. A legal means of migration exist, one that disseminates visas to individual who live outside of the country; the illegal migrants from Mexico act unjustifiably by pushing to the front of the line. Rose additionally tells the stories of the Border Control and Minutemen who see themselves as protecting legitimate citizens from migrants whose first act in their new country is to violate its …show more content…

No More Deaths’ had second campaign, which the group called: “Humanitarian Aid Is Never a Crime.” In large part, this second campaign was sparked after two of the group’s volunteers, Shanti Sellz and Daniel Strauss, were stopped in July 2005 by Border Patrol agents and arrested for “transporting” three illegal immigrants in their car. (Rose 65)
This separation focuses to the conflict: where parts feel they are giving "hospitality," government law sees them as "harboring"; where parts accept they are emulating a higher good law (when they give nourishment and water to migrants in the desert), elected law sees them as "empowering" migrants, or actually "disguising" them. (Rose

Open Document