Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Problems with prison reform
Should felons who have completed their sentence be allowed to vote
Should felons who have completed their sentence be allowed to vote
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Problems with prison reform
Prisoners in the United State lose their rights to various freedoms but that does not imply that they should lose their civil rights. Prisoners are counted in the census and should be allowed to vote; they take a percentage of the population in each state. Gongchar, Michael. "Should Felons Be Allowed to Vote After They Have Served Their Time?" The Learning Network Should Felons Be Allowed to Vote After They Have Served Their Time Comments. The New York Times, 18 Feb. 2014. Web. 20 Nov. 2015. The newspaper is comparing inmates that can’t vote now to the Civil War in the south where the criminal justice banned African American from voting. The newspaper also acknowledges that some crimes committed have harsh sentences. Any person can be incarnated …show more content…
I can use this to compare on how every state should let the prisoners and ex-convicts vote for the president and not just the governor of the state. The law in which prisoners who serve more than two years are not allowed to vote, is something I find interesting, because it can become a law in the United States. I think the audience would like understand a balance can be made between those who don’t want prisoners to vote and those who do want prisoners to vote. I also want to know the law of how many states contribute to letting inmates vote. I might not use this article as much, but I will use the cases given and research more in …show more content…
David. "Congress Must Pass Law That Allows Former Prisoners To Vote." Christian Science Monitor 18 Jan. 2012: n.pag. Academic Search Complete. Web. 7 Nov. 2015. The article explains a bill called the Democracy Restoration Act. The author explains how the bill should be passed in every state in America. In the bill has a required test that the prisoner must pass in order to vote. The article explains the test is to show if the ex-convict cares about society. The author uses logos facts about how many ex-convicts make up society now. Schiriguna provides statics on how many former prisoners have jobs and contribute to the culture itself. The article is useful to me because the government has been working on passing the Democracy Restoration Act since 2011. The bill if passes it will let prisoners who complete their sentence and return to the civilian world vote. I want to branch out and learn more about other bills that congress want to pass for prisoners allowing them to vote. I understand the author point of view and how it would contradict other people point of view. The article is a great use to understand the different opinions that contradict what I might state in my
Trachtenberg, B. (2009, February). Incarceration policy strikes out: Exploding prison population compromises the U.S. justice system. ABA Journal, 66.
What if one day you weren't allowed to voice your opinion about the people who run our country, your country, in other words, if you couldn’t vote? A lot of people don’t vote, but what if you didn’t even have the right to do so? In 12 states, ex-felons aren’t allowed to vote even after serving their prison time. When you think of a felon you probably think of someone that has done terrible things and shouldn't have a voice in politics, but that figure should be changed. One lady, by the name of Leola Strickland, isn’t allowed to vote because she has a felony on her record for postdating a few checks and having them bounce because she lost her job(1).
I believe that the expansion of prisoners’ rights, since the famous Cooper v. Plate (1964) case, has been a great thing. For a long time prisoners were treated like they were not a person, like they were the filth of this earth. They had no rights and were not offered any type of protection within the correctional system. With the Cooper v. Plate case, came the law that the prisoners’ rights would be protected by the constitution. This also led to prisoners being able to file lawsuits against state officials who may be violating their rights, and their overall treatment within the correctional system. These were luxuries that prisoners had not had before. They were not given the basic human rights, nor were their rights protected by the constitution. No one had truly advocated for prisoner rights, until this case. This case paved the way for prisoner rights and the humane treatment for all.
In the 21 first Century, the United States still has an extremely large number of individuals in the penal system. To this day, the American country still contains the highest prison population rate in the world. Although mass incarceration rates are extremely high, decreases in this number have been made. Since the first time since the 1970s, the imprisoned population has declined about 3 percent. This small step seemingly exemplifies how a vast majority of individuals who becoming aware of these issues and performing actions to decrease these numbers. In the Chapter 13 of James Kilgore’s Understanding Mass Incarceration: A People's Guide to the Key Civil Rights Struggle of Our Time, he asserts how individuals who oppose mass incarceration
In the United States 2.2 million citizens are incarcerated on felony charges. Laws in America prohibit felons from voting. As a result, on Election Day 5.3 million citizens of America are disenfranchised because of crimes they once committed. Though they once broke the law, they have served their time and have been punished adequately in accordance with the American Justice System. Felons should regain full voting rights after their stint in prison.
One of the more controversial debates in today’s political arena, especially around election times, is that of felon disenfranchisement. The disenfranchisement of felons, or the practice of denying felons and ex-felons the right to vote, has been in practice before the colonization of America and traces back to early England; however, it has not become so controversial and publicized until recent times. “In today’s political system, felons and ex-felons are the only competent adults that are denied the right to vote; the total of those banned to vote is approximately 4.7 million men and women, over two percent of the nation’s population” (Reiman 3).
The idea of taking away a criminal’s right to vote and has been around since ancient Greece and Rome. Civil death is the loss of all civil rights because of a serious conviction. The forfeiture of property, the loss of the right to appease in court, and a prohibition on entering in contracts, as well as the loss of voting rights. Civil death was brought over by English colonists, but most of the aspects of the civil death originally were abolished except for felon disenfranchisement in some parts of America according to the National Conference of State Legislature. In Virginia, Florida, Iowa, and Kentucky, convicted felons permanently lose their right to vote, without pardon from the governor. Some states convicted felons must wait a certain amount of time after they complete their sentence before their rights can be restored. Other states, they have to reapply to have their voting rights back. The District of Columbia and 38 other states, most ex-felons automatically gain their right to vote after sentence completion. In Maine and Vermont, felons never lose their right to vote. They can cast a ballot while in prison. At the time in 2013, Governor McDonnell signed an executive order creating new rights restoration processes for persons with prior felony
...he right to vote. I made a ten question survey that asked questions about letting convicted felons have the right to vote in major elections throughout America. Thirteen out of thirty high school students said that convicted felons should have the right to vote because they are American citizens. The other seventeen people I surveyed said that they should not have the right to vote because they had their chance to perform correctly in society and failed miserably. As you can now see, I have given you many reasons to see that convicted felons should not have the right to vote. They cannot be trusted with such a responsibility as voting for this country’s next leader.
Mass incarceration has caused the prison’s populations to increase dramatically. The reason for this increase in population is because of the sentencing policies that put a lot of men and women in prison for an unjust amount of time. The prison population has be caused by periods of high crime rates, by the medias assembly line approach to the production of news stories that bend the truth of the crimes, and by political figures preying on citizens fear. For example, this fear can be seen in “Richard Nixon’s famous campaign call for “law and order” spoke to those fears, hostilities, and racist underpinnings” (Mauer pg. 52). This causes law enforcement to focus on crimes that involve violent crimes/offenders. Such as, gang members, drive by shootings, drug dealers, and serial killers. Instead of our law agencies focusing their attention on the fundamental causes of crime. Such as, why these crimes are committed, the family, and preventive services. These agencies choose to fight crime by establishing a “War On Drugs” and with “Get Tough” sentencing policies. These policies include “three strikes laws, mandatory minimum sentences, and juvenile waives laws which allows kids to be trialed as adults.
Angela Davis once wrote “the prison serves as an institution that consolidates the state’s inability and refusal to address the most pressing social problems of this era.” Angela Yvonne Davis also compiled the book If They Come in the Morning: Voices of the Resistance in 1971, which was a powerful recount of her infamous trial. The main two topics she presented was the idea of the political prisoner, and the repressive nature of the prison system. The book is not only an account of Ms. Davis experience throughout her legendary political trial, but it is also an analysis of the concept of a political prisoner.
In most states ex-felons are not allowed to vote. This takes away a large portion of the voting population because of how many ex-felons there are right now and the many more that will be in the future. Ex-felons may also have a very hard time finding a job or a place to live. Legally landlords are allowed to deny an ex-felon. In Carbondale Illinois rental properties owners “Home Rentals” does background checks to make sure that none of their potential renters are felons. If they are felons Home Rentals claims that they will deny them the privilege of living in one of their properties. Ex-felons may also have a hard time finding jobs. Not many employers are willing to employ ex-felons for the fear of more crime or less commitment. Though denying these ex-felons jobs will not help the economy, only giving them jobs can help that.
Although this right is considered fundamental, restrictions have been placed on this right. The main restriction is placed on persons convicted of a felony conviction, all felonies, not just infamous ones. Today on Election Day, as Americans wait in line to cast their vote, over 4.65 million people are denied this most fundamental democratic right because of a past or present felony conviction. It is true that some felons can make bad judgments that are provocative and rebellious and the foundation to further jeopardy. In fact, statistics show the number of times prisoners had been arrested was the best predictor of whether they would commit more crimes after being released and how quickly they would return to their criminal ways....
I enjoyed reading the article, “Why Prisons Don’t Work”. I thought it tied together many of the topics and ideas we have discussed in class, but also brought up things that were new to me. I was most surprised to see that this article had been written by Wilbert Rideau in 1994. It is now 2018, and I feel as if this article still entails many of the issues we face today in our prison system. It is now 24 years later, and much of what Rideau describes still seems to be present. But to make matters even worse, Rideau begins writing this article about when he was sentenced to death in 1962. This means that in 56 years, there has been little to no improvement in the prison system. I see big problems with this. I don’t understand how people can sit back and do nothing when they see how the prison system is failing our prisoners.
Overcrowding in our state and federal jails today has become a big issue. Back in the 20th century, prison rates in the U.S were fairly low. During the years later due to economic and political factors, that rate began to rise. According to the Bureau of justice statistics, the amount of people in prison went from 139 per 100,000 inmates to 502 per 100,000 inmates from 1980 to 2009. That is nearly 261%. Over 2.1 million Americans are incarcerated and 7.2 million are either incarcerated or under parole. According to these statistics, the U.S has 25% of the world’s prisoners. (Rick Wilson pg.1) Our prison systems simply have too many people. To try and help fix this problem, there needs to be shorter sentences for smaller crimes. Based on the many people in jail at the moment, funding for prison has dropped tremendously.
In this critic, I will be analyzing and comparing two books. The first book is “A question of Freedom a Memoir of Learning, Survival, and Coming of Age in Prison” by R. Dwayne Betts. The second book is “Newjack: Guarding Sing Sing” by Ted Conover. In this comparison will first give a short summarization of both books. Second I will be answering the fallowing questions, what prisons are discussed? What types of prisoners are there- age, race, sex, level of crime? How current is the information? What are the conditions of the prisons? How are the prisoners treated? How are the guards and their viewpoints represented? How are the prisoners and their viewpoints represented? What forms of rehabilitation are there? What are the social relationships with other inmates? What opportunities are available to occupy prisoners? What point of view is the author taking – critical, Positive, does she/he write from the viewpoint of a guard, a prisoner? What evidence is/are the author’s points based on and how is the evidence presented - for example, first hand observations, Statistics? Also what changes, if any, are proposed or discussed by the author? How does the information in this book compare with what you’ve read in the text and articles and what you have observed on a class trip? Lastly what is your opinion of the information and viewpoint expressed in the book?